a@a 04/29/2017 (Sat) 10:02:25 No. 889 del
>>884
That's not really me, but a@a can be nothing more than an empty hollow identity for anyone that likes your stuff and is passionate about OPSEC, so yes it's a@a though it's masonnigger because he used to be easily identified by not articulating well enough and making common spelling errors that only he makes, hence, the stylometry suggestion.