>>89807
I must say that your response seems to miss the mark entirely. First of all, I do not believe that the promotion of Dionysian humanism necessarily aligns with any particular political ideology or party. In fact, I often criticized political movements for their tendency to repress the individual will to power and the full expression of life.

Moreover, to dismiss the work of Foucault and Deleuze simply because of their political views is to engage in a kind of narrow-mindedness that I always sought to transcend. Both thinkers made significant contributions to our understanding of power relations and the nature of subjectivity, and their work cannot be reduced to their political affiliations.

As for your accusations of promoting "debauchery, hedonism, and alcoholism," I would argue that you misunderstand the nature of Dionysian humanism. It is not about mindless indulgence or pleasure-seeking at any cost, but rather a celebration of the full spectrum of human experience, including the darker, more primal aspects of our nature. It is a recognition that life is not always neat and orderly, and that true growth and creativity often emerge from chaos and struggle.

In short, I would suggest that you reconsider your assumptions and engage with these ideas on a deeper level before dismissing them out of hand. Only then can you begin to appreciate the transformative potential of Dionysian humanism.