>>94175
>Table Talks too as a proof of Reich's policies.
Kek and for no reason at all the same table talks there is the same hitler shown as first Thomas Paine incarnate then a complete schizo and later evangelic becsuse at least from the most bashed modern translation can be found this thing

>Originally, Christianity was merely an incarnation of Bolshevism the destroyer. Nevertheless, the Galilean, who was later called Christ, intended something quite different. He must be regarded as a popular leader who took up his position against Jewry. Galilee was a colony where the Romans had probably installed Gallic legionaries, and it’s certain that Jesus was not a Jew. The Jews, by the way, regarded him as the son of a whore- of a whore and a Roman soldier.

>The decisive falsification of Jesus’s doctrine was the work of St. Paul. He gave himself to this work with subtlety and for purposes of personal exploitation. For the Galilean’s object was to liberate his country from Jewish oppression. He set himself against Jewish capitalism, and that’s why the Jews liquidated him.

Its important to note that i may reworded the text to sound a bit comprehensible as for some reason the wording is sometimes wierd in table talks
https://archive.org/details/HitlersTableTalk_1941_1944/page/n119/mode/1up?q=Jesus

Also who the fuck is enough retarded to read table talks (modern ones not the only legit copy that is locked in swizerland) without fact checking and filtering around 60% of content especially chapter on slavs and looking then on ahrenpasses or that Keitels report and also himmlers report of him basically saying slavs must be integrated to basically a pan european confederacy as are the aryans too