>>94641
>>94642
I'll keep that in mind. So essentially, Hitler's viewpoints evolved through the years even past that book's contents which were already incomplete to begin with.

Is the book perhaps still of interest, as it'd be an accurate view of Hitler's direction for Germany if it was not drawn into a world war? Something that concerns me is that the historian attached to the book is a jew besides its publication being well after the war which is almost always a guarantee of fabrication or intentional mistranslation.