T thought that unions were state run, private unions were banned, yes, because all workers were made to join a union controlled by the party, and they were given certain standards such as the five-day work week, and all who refused to work were punished.
I think you think I believe in some thing I do not and have never claimed to, I support ownership of private property very much, it fact, it serves as the foundation of the moral system which defines my society's domestic laws.
I am not against private property ownership, I am very, very much for it, where are you getting this from?
ownership is taking person and property, adding the medium of consent as a requirement to external interaction, and the freedom of anything to be done within those bounds, that is the NAP in a nutshell.
where have I ever claimed to be against private property? what the hell are you talking about? please please please link me a quote, because I cannot find it.
I'm honestly very confused, are we having difficulty of communication?
a good idea is a good idea, regardless of it's source, if it comes tangled with a bunch of bad ideas, simply untangle them and take the ones you think will work for you. it not their system, it's your own.
I am not consumed with nostalgia, trying to recreate what was a unique society in a unique time under unique circumstances.
I am not consumed with hatred for my enemy, I refuse to simply live in opposition to them.
I am consumed with love for my people, white people worldwide, of all ethnicities, european, north american, oceanian, and even middle eastern/north african and those white diaspora in other countries of the world (such as south africa), the love of my people isd the only guiding principle I hold, all else is disregarded, the policies I support are vetted only by my belief that they are what would be the best interest for my people to thrive and propagate.
"white" unifies us, yes, ethnicity is very important, and the wide diversity within our people is another treasure to be safeguarded, but we are all united, even if it is only by a common threat (it isn't the only unifying factor, there are much stronger ties, but even if there was nothing more than the opposition, it's enough). we survive and thrive, then we get back to individual identities.
The jew mocks honor, to them glory comes from living off of the host as you kill it like a parasite. Agreed, perhaps hoping for honor is too much, but I would take fear in it's place.
I highly doubt white master fucking niggers was a common practice, most white guys do no find negresses attractive. even if it were thew case, microchimerism does not affect the offspring of men, only women, if anything, the increasing proportion of white genetic material may help to tame whatever half-breed spawn these unions produce. but the unions won't happen, not very often, at least, white guys like white women, and some (mostly weebos, betas, and other degenerates) like azn chicks.
When is the last time you saw a negress you wanted to fuck? or an sandnigress? or a mestizo chica? or a jewess? or a curry bitch? or any non-white female? if you could choose between them or a white woman, would you ever choose to mix? most guys are into their own race, even those who pretend not to be. the white on anything else rape rate is roundable to 0%. think of how broad the term "rape" is in official terms right now.
I know, it's just another kike lie, weird you brought this up though, Never
said anything about Einsatzgruppen.
what is you first language? I think we are experiencing some breakdown in communication here.
I'm talking about the net here as a politically useful tool, a tool for discourse, a tool for action, 90's net wasn't at that point yet, both in infrastructure and culture.
Yes, I am aware that most of the internet and big tech is owned by kikes, has been for a while, this means nothing of relevance to what I was saying.