/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Political discussion of ideology, history, and [current] events.

Posting mode: Reply

Check to confirm you're not a robot
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Password
Drawing x size canvas
File(s)

Remember to follow the rules

Max file size: 350.00 MB

Max files: 5

Max message length: 4096

Manage Board | Moderate Thread

Return | Catalog | Bottom


PLEASE USE THE STICKIES + CATALOG
Where everyone with an ounce of jew blood and traitors are public toilets
Logs can be found here: https://endchan.net/logs.js
Insulting National Socialism or Hitler or promoting jews will be banned immediately.

Expand All Images


(21.42 KB 480x300 1575268466892.jpg)
Discussion re: WOMEN Anonymous 01/04/2020 (Sat) 11:47:12 Id: eaf710 [Preview] No. 78086
Serious questions on the role of women in our society. Questions that concern breeding charactetistics and establishing strong culture and nation would be interesting.

Some thoughts on the matter:

Women are the highest order of beauty, more precisely feminine women. They are the vessel that leads to men creating strong cultures, Nations and we'll just about everything else.
But
Women are not natural intellects in reaching high understandings of the complexities of the what men have created
But
Of course there are always outliers


Anonymous 01/04/2020 (Sat) 14:56:16 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.78087 del
(375.29 KB 1600x2812 4980.jpg)
(1.34 MB 1600x2222 535354.png)
Yes OP, women can be intelligent but women are also dumb even when they're "smart". Their emotions, like their orgasms, are significantly increased in comparison to most actual men. When the hormonal clusterfuck that is menstruation is added into the mix, they're also volatile. This and natural biological weakness, the fact that women take 3x longer to gain muscle mass, is why traditionally in many cultures: Men have been the dominating force. Someone had to keep all that batshit in check. In came jews to fuck it all up and destroy traditional values. Of course kikes lied about history, but it's more than that. Now women are being raised not as their traditional and biological natures, but as "automatically awesome masters of all trades immediately without any training or struggle". Women are promoted at early ages and ruined through the stress of it. The focus is not on motherhood. Not driven home with an importance of family over profession. Rather the other way around. This through pathetic kike-started feminism that was increased with Hollywoodjewlywood propaganda.

Women are not meant for leadership. Women are biologically attuned to nurture. They are not supposed to be given a modicum of power. The head of the family and who put food on the table was always supposed to be the father, while being motherly used to actually mean something. Take a normal, calm, rational woman. I know MGTOW claims these don't exist, but I've experienced them. I have also experienced witnessing these calm and rational women being given positions of authority. Responsibility heaped on them because "women are multitaskers and can do anything better" bullshit. It only adds to her stress. The small amount of authority and increase in stress causes her to lose her already fragile mind. She becomes a megabitch. Her sex life is abstinence because she's such a cunt, nobody wants her cunt. So her cunt tightens up. She craves sex, but becomes deranged because she can't get any. Her pussy is a vicegrip filled with cobwebs. Not even when she finds someone out there who's not even a man but a cuck and a coward, whom never has the balls to put women in their place (traditional role). Some women will have children with this pussy, but they will withhold sex most of the time and usually cheat with an actual man. Women cannot help being attracted to a man who's strong (much more than just physically), compared to a weak faggot.

Everything has been degenerate for so long, I've noticed the absolute confusion of women when they witness a man refusing to be a cuck and asserts his dominance. They're confused because it's not common, but it turns them on. And this is the most important part. If indigenous European men Aryan, white, whatever you choose to call us are autistic, submissive, docile pussies, the jew knows most of the male negro population will not be. So kikes push shit like blacked and multiple forms of propaganda through television and movies to batter down the white man.

Letting it bring you down, becoming a pussy and having an inability to be more dominant than the negro, means the end of our people. The genetic elimination of Aryan existence. Don't give jews what they want. Do not seek distractions through waifuism, MGTOW, feminism, faggotry, promoting race mixing and immigration or anything else meant to destroy traditional values and cause white genocide.


Anonymous 01/05/2020 (Sun) 00:09:42 [Preview] No.78091 del
>>78086
That girl is cute! She looks like a good hole! May I fuck her?


Anonymous 01/05/2020 (Sun) 00:47:26 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.78092 del
(162.85 KB 480x491 435.jpg)
>>78091
>sees drawing
>immediately wants to fuck a drawing
Retard. Enjoy the paper-cut on your dick.


Anonymous 01/05/2020 (Sun) 15:09:24 Id: 7d1216 [Preview] No.78096 del
I've been interested in the idea of simply making everything other than white (and possibly asian) males lose all legal protections.

Then they have no choice but to become slaves in order to benefit second-hand from the legal protections of their owners, of course, this means the owner has free reign to do whatever he pleases to them.

However, I'm not expecting some pornographic fantasy to be realized, as I expect white males to be generally benevolent towards their property, and non-whites/females may even come to settle in to their new lives, a generation or two later on, and there will be some new order, new culture, and new understanding between all involved.

BTW, Jews are not white, and may have to be removed entirely if shapeshifting becomes an issue.


Anonymous 01/05/2020 (Sun) 15:39:06 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.78097 del
>>78096
It didn't last when kikes tried it, so they had to invent the lie that "slavery was due to white people". Also it was their plot to breed us out with negros later down the line. Wailing along with them to have equal rights first, despite the fact of bringing them over, then eventually granting more opportunities than white men. Bad idea.

Malcolm X was a fucking moron who hated white people, even though he knew the divisiveness of the jew, and wasn't aware the eternal merchant parasite was responsible for the Trans-Atlantic slave trade. He was killed by his own kind.


Anonymous 01/05/2020 (Sun) 20:50:36 Id: 0ad91d [Preview] No.78102 del
>Women are the highest order of beauty, more precisely feminine women.
lol, no they're not. men are way more statuesque than women. Maybe from the age of 15-19, GIRLS (not women) are on par with men in beauty. After that, they fade pretty quickly. Women are just a necessary nuisance.


Anonymous 01/06/2020 (Mon) 00:12:01 Id: 7d1216 [Preview] No.78112 del
>>78097
castration, population control, treat their reproductive rights like we do for cats and dogs.
those arab psychopaths got one thing right there.


Anonymous 01/06/2020 (Mon) 00:19:32 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.78113 del
>>78102
I would say women in their 20 through 30s may be beautiful, but that's rare (because it's white women and those are rare in dwindling white America). I'm never attracted to teens. They're too stupid.
>>78112
No. There should never be displaced races in other nations, period. Living among your own people and not with immigrants nor being an immigrant is the end goal. The jewish Marrano ran Trans-Atlantic slave trade didn't last and turned into a clusterfuck which kikes used against us. The Roman empire slaves rose up from time to time, and then amalgamated with jewish heralds screaming and writing the same old multiculturalism shilling tricks they use today. And of course you're aware of what happened with the Arbeit Macht Frei camps. In the future going forward, expulsion or rope should be the only two options. Races cannot live with each other. All must separate.


Anonymous 01/06/2020 (Mon) 01:25:06 Id: 2e1879 [Preview] No.78114 del
>>78096
>let's bring back slavery but make it only non-white so it's OK, r-r-right goy?

No, fuck off kike.


Anonymous 01/06/2020 (Mon) 01:28:08 Id: 2e1879 [Preview] No.78115 del
>>78097
I keep alternating between whether Malcolm X was based as fuck or just another patsy. He certainly seemed more eloquent and thoughtful than, for example, MLK or many other blacks.


Anonymous 01/07/2020 (Tue) 12:47:59 Id: 8ef6fb [Preview] No.78139 del
(19.79 KB 552x413 1575283405407.jpg)
Thank you to the replies above it gave me reference to flesh my ideas more succinctly:

There can be know doubt that Men, real men, free from the constraints that bastardise there vision, can see levels of beauty and disgust.

The highest order of beauty is white feminine Women. Women free from the constraints of worldy matter's (that is, what Men have built).

No Man, if asked to see only one image for infinity, would deny his instinct for an image of his ideal women.


Anonymous 01/07/2020 (Tue) 12:57:04 Id: 8ef6fb [Preview] No.78143 del
(133.86 KB 523x800 1570785255272.jpg)
>>78091
Agree with everything you said. I learnt many things about women from reading Hitlers thoughts on the matter. The women that surrounded Adolf appear very beautiful, smart man.


Anonymous 01/07/2020 (Tue) 18:14:35 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.78145 del
>>78143
lol. Make sure you reply to the correct person next time. That wrong linked reply makes it look like you agree with the Tor tard who wants to fuck cartoons.
>>78139
Though one anon disagreed with you, I'm not against the aesthetic of pure Aryan women. I'm for their preservation Though free of the constraints of what men built? Nah. That sounds like feminism. Women free from the constraints of jewish degeneracy, though rare, are the highest form of beauty. Women need to return to their natural traditional roles. The ones they're biologically attuned for. Motherhood. Nurturing. Supporting men of their same race to continue our races not shunning us because of jewish feminism or sick interracial breeding.


Anonymous 01/08/2020 (Wed) 02:15:38 Id: 59534b [Preview] No.78154 del
(21.88 KB 400x267 75 john glover.jpg)
>>78145

Yeah that is part of the definition I was using that includes degeneracy, but also includes other more feminine traits, i.e. separation or apathetic like attitude from the politics of men. Women have there own politics to deal with like competition for dominate males, warding off female competitors, child rearing etc. Schopenhauer talks about this at length.

Nature = that which Selects from the chaos and Order

Women select Male for breeding

Women = Nature

*** apologies I was posting in the dark thx for the pick up


Schopenhauer on Women: Anonymous 01/08/2020 (Wed) 02:42:33 Id: 59534b [Preview] No.78156 del
(438.27 KB 1920x1920 101010121201210201.jpg)
One need only look at a woman's shape to discover that she is not
intended for either too much mental or too much physical work. She pays the debt of life not by what she does but by what she suffers--by the pains of child-bearing, care for the child, and by subjection to man, to whom she should be a patient and cheerful companion. The greatest
sorrows and joys or great exhibition of strength are not assigned to
her; her life should flow more quietly, more gently, and less
obtrusively than man's, without her being essentially happier or
unhappier.


Schopenhauer on Women cont.: Anonymous 01/08/2020 (Wed) 02:46:08 Id: 59534b [Preview] No.78157 del
Women are directly adapted to act as the nurses and educators of our
early childhood, for the simple reason that they themselves are
childish, foolish, and short-sighted--in a word, are big children all
their lives, something intermediate between the child and the man, who
is a man in the strict sense of the word. Consider how a young girl will
toy day after day with a child, dance with it and sing to it; and then
consider what a man, with the very best intentions in the world, could
do in her place.


Schopenhauer on Women cont.: Anonymous 01/08/2020 (Wed) 02:46:59 Id: 59534b [Preview] No.78158 del
With girls, Nature has had in view what is called in a dramatic sense a
"striking effect," for she endows them for a few years with a richness
of beauty and a, fulness of charm at the expense of the rest of their
lives; so that they may during these years ensnare the fantasy of a man
to such a degree as to make him rush into taking the honourable care of
them, in some kind of form, for a lifetime--a step which would not
seem sufficiently justified if he only considered the matter.
Accordingly, Nature has furnished woman, as she has the rest of her
creatures, with the weapons and implements necessary for the protection
of her existence and for just the length of time that they will be of
service to her; so that Nature has proceeded here with her usual
economy. Just as the female ant after coition loses her wings, which
then become superfluous, nay, dangerous for breeding purposes, so for
the most part does a woman lose her beauty after giving birth to one or
two children; and probably for the same reasons.

Then again we find that young girls in their hearts regard their
domestic or other affairs as secondary things, if not as a mere jest.
Love, conquests, and all that these include, such as dressing, dancing,
and so on, they give their serious attention.


Schopenhauer on Women cont.: Anonymous 01/08/2020 (Wed) 02:49:59 Id: 59534b [Preview] No.78159 del
The nobler and more perfect a thing is, the later and slower is it in
reaching maturity. Man reaches the maturity of his reasoning and mental
faculties scarcely before he is eight-and-twenty; woman when she is
eighteen; but hers is reason of very narrow limitations. This is why
women remain children all their lives, for they always see only what is
near at hand, cling to the present, take the appearance of a thing for
reality, and prefer trifling matters to the most important. It is by
virtue of man's reasoning powers that he does not live in the present
only, like the brute, but observes and ponders over the past and future;
and from this spring discretion, care, and that anxiety which we so
frequently notice in people. The advantages, as well as the
disadvantages, that this entails, make woman, in consequence of her
weaker reasoning powers, less of a partaker in them. Moreover, she is
intellectually short-sighted, for although her intuitive understanding
quickly perceives what is near to her, on the other hand her circle of
vision is limited and does not embrace anything that is remote; hence
everything that is absent or past, or in the future, affects women in a
less degree than men. This is why they have greater inclination for
extravagance, which sometimes borders on madness. Women in their hearts
think that men are intended to earn money so that they may spend it, if
possible during their husband's lifetime, but at any rate after his
death.


Schopenhauer on Women cont.: Anonymous 01/08/2020 (Wed) 03:21:46 Id: 59534b [Preview] No.78160 del
(203.14 KB 799x897 101010101020.jpg)
It is because women's reasoning powers are weaker that they show more
sympathy for the unfortunate than men, and consequently take a kindlier
interest in them. On the other hand, women are inferior to men in
matters of justice, honesty, and conscientiousness. Again, because their
reasoning faculty is weak, things clearly visible and real, and
belonging to the present, exercise a power over them which is rarely
counteracted by abstract thoughts, fixed maxims, or firm resolutions, in
general, by regard for the past and future or by consideration for what
is absent and remote. Accordingly they have the first and principal
qualities of virtue, but they lack the secondary qualities which are
often a necessary instrument in developing it. Women may be compared in
this respect to an organism that has a liver but no gall-bladder.


Schopenhauer on Women cont.: Anonymous 01/08/2020 (Wed) 03:28:18 Id: 59534b [Preview] No.78161 del
So that it will be found that the fundamental fault in the character of
women is that they have no "_sense of justice_." This arises from their
deficiency in the power of reasoning already referred to, and
reflection, but is also partly due to the fact that Nature has not
destined them, as the weaker sex, to be dependent on strength but on
cunning; this is why they are instinctively crafty, and have an
ineradicable tendency to lie. For as lions are furnished with claws and
teeth, elephants with tusks, boars with fangs, bulls with horns, and the cuttlefish with its dark, inky fluid, so Nature has provided woman for her protection and defence with the faculty of dissimulation, and all the power which Nature has given to man in the form of bodily strength and reason has been conferred on woman in this form.


Schopenhauer on Women cont.: Anonymous 01/08/2020 (Wed) 03:30:07 Id: 59534b [Preview] No.78162 del
Hence, dissimulation is innate in woman and almost as characteristic of the very stupid as of the clever. Accordingly, it is as natural for women to dissemble at every opportunity as it is for those animals to turn to their weapons when they are attacked; and they feel in doing so that in a certain measure they are only making use of their rights. Therefore a woman who is perfectly truthful and does not dissemble is perhaps an impossibility. This is why they see through dissimulation in others so easily; therefore it is not advisable to attempt it with them. From the fundamental defect that has been stated, and all that it involves, spring falseness, faithlessness, treachery, ungratefulness, and so on. In a court of justice women are more often found guilty of perjury than men. It is indeed to be generally questioned whether they should be allowed to take an oath at all. From time to time there are repeated cases everywhere of ladies, who want for nothing, secretly pocketing and taking away things from shop counters.


Anonymous 01/08/2020 (Wed) 18:26:04 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.78169 del
(440.77 KB 1856x768 arthur-schopenhauer.jpg)
>>78156
>by subjection to man, to whom she should be a patient and cheerful companion
>>78157
>they themselves are childish, foolish, and short-sighted--in a word, are big children all their lives
>>78158
>the fantasy of a man to such a degree as to make him rush into taking the honourable care of them
>>78159
>Man reaches the maturity of his reasoning and mental faculties scarcely before he is eight-and-twenty
>woman when she is eighteen; but hers is reason of very narrow limitations
>This is why women remain children all their lives
>cling to the present, take the appearance of a thing for reality, and prefer trifling matters to the most important
>It is by virtue of man's reasoning powers that he does not live in the present only, like the brute, but observes and ponders over the past and future;
>woman, in consequence of her weaker reasoning powers, less of a partaker in them
>Moreover, she is intellectually short-sighted
>This is why they have greater inclination for extravagance, which sometimes borders on madness
>>78160
>women are inferior to men in matters of justice, honesty, and conscientiousness.
Schopenhauer truly speaks to the soul. There is not a woman on earth to which the above descriptions do not fit.
>>78161
>>78162
Now for these, I argue the fact that this describes jews' natural tendency to lie much more than women. He suggests that every woman is a liar and a truthful woman is impossible. On the contrary, there are (few) women capable of truth yet never capable of not being childish. Even the most strict, stuffy, grumpy bitch is going to act like a pouting brat on the playground when she's not getting her way. And cheerful, chipper women are fucking nuts. Bipolar. You think they're happy go lucky, then they snap on you like shifting from Jekyll to Hyde. However, there is not a single jew capable of telling the truth all the time.
A jew when rarely speaking the truth does so only to cover up a greater lie.


Anonymous 01/09/2020 (Thu) 13:20:15 Id: 7d0ca3 [Preview] No.78183 del
>>78169
... and Arthur would definitely know what he was talking considering his family was in the Trading business ... Pic related would also apply to Islam both religions locked to a shithole.


I'm fucking insane ignore this post, ban me plz Anonymous 01/12/2020 (Sun) 17:34:41 Id: 7d1216 [Preview] No.78217 del
remove all law protections from anyone who is not a white male gentile, give them the same legal status as that of a tiny valueless rock.

reduce all government to the night-watchman-state level of minarchism, it's role only to the enforcement of the law and the defense of the country and it's borders, reduce all laws to the NAP, with no recognition of property that is not physical in nature.

Make it such that the only legal protections subhumans can get is that which comes as a consequence of being owned by someone the NAP actually applies to (white male gentiles), and that even this will offer them no protections from their owners (so that they must remain their owner's good graces).

forbid anyone from entering or leaving the borders of the country, bar any trade with other countries, cut off all access from and to the rest of the word (aside from communications), no goods may enter of leave the borders either.

this results in the enslavement of females, enslavement of non-whites, and the enslavement non-humans.

severely reduce non-white numbers while tweaking their gene-pool in the process, at the same time drastically increase the number of white (and part-white) children.

with the new freedoms offered, society changes, money goes from state issued to offered by private banks, representative currency (and the standard of precious metals and gems) comes as a result. Usury is drastically reduced as interest rates become competitive and eventually disappear entirely, credit disappears as loans are now only in the form of investments into ventures promising returns. Jews are slaves and get the worst of the worst while their ill-gotten gains are taken and returned to whoever can physically seize them first, I expect the jewish population to be reduced to zero in short order of time.

Through the magic of the internet, the nation goes from being hated and feared to being a place emulated by those who see it's unrivaled prosperity.

there are elections for leadership in the government, but no new laws may be created, no old laws deleted, no existing laws ignored or altered, the leaders merely oversee the society that exists, instead of trying to make a new one.

eventually, other countries who imitate us will be vetted and allowed to become a part of us, I see most of north america, europe, north asia, and oceania joining into one massive empire over time, perhaps east asian males can be given the same status of white gentile males, and countries like japan korea, or even china and mongolia can be taken in as well.

maybe then conquest can begin, as the empire expands to conquer the whole globe, all other races become domesticated animals, slaves and pets to the master race(s?), then we take to the stars once the world is ours.

elected leaders are relocated to the antarctic for the duration of their term, doing nothing but oversee their people rather than engage themselves in frivolous luxuries.


Anonymous 01/12/2020 (Sun) 19:58:08 Id: 7d1216 [Preview] No.78224 del
>>78217
im sorry for making this post, i was possessed by the devil


Anonymous 01/12/2020 (Sun) 20:04:25 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.78225 del
>>78217
Yet another contrary from National Socialism "suggestion" post. The kind that ever serve as distractions and nothing more.
>remove all law protections from anyone who is not a white male gentile, give them the same legal status as that of a tiny valueless rock.
>forbid anyone from entering or leaving the borders of the country
No. Deport them all, especially jews. Living with them has proven to be harmful and ineffectual.
>this results in the enslavement of females,
There's no need to enslave white women. They need to be brought back to their traditional roles with the man as head of the household and the provider, and women as family support, nurturing, caring for the children. That means an economic change is in order where both parents aren't working just to make enough to survive and leaving their children home to be brainwashed by the jewish media. That plot of course, kikes orchestrated.
>enslavement of non-whites, and the enslavement non-humans.
Slavery is what kikes want. They were responsible for the Tran Atlantic slave trade. Their Talmud tells them they'll have Gentile slaves. That is why they're on the path to enslaving multiple nations. As I said before, no, non-whites simply need to be shipped back.
>money goes from state issued to offered by private banks,
On the contrary. The Third Reich had one primary state bank to prevent the jewish money lending tradition.
>representative currency (and the standard of precious metals and gems) comes as a result.
Currency needs to hold true value, not speculative. That is the issue.
>Usury is drastically reduced as interest rates become competitive and eventually disappear entirely,
Or simply eliminate interest entirely.
>credit disappears as loans are now only in the form of investments into ventures promising returns.
Loans need to be towards white families, with a quarter of the loan struck for every child they have.
>Jews are slaves and get the worst of the worst while their ill-gotten gains are taken and returned to whoever can physically seize them first,
The jews need to leave. They cannot be permitted to stay.
>I expect the jewish population to be reduced to zero in short order of time.
I like rope. It's neat.
>Through the magic of the internet, the nation goes from being hated and feared to being a place emulated by those who see it's unrivaled prosperity.
That depends on keeping kikes off of the internet, so they may not control websites, censor all truth, and sew their typical propaganda.
>eventually, other countries who imitate us will be vetted and allowed to become a part of us
>I see most of north america, europe, north asia, and oceania joining into one massive empire over time,
>perhaps east asian males can be given the same status of white gentile males, and countries like japan korea,
>or even china and mongolia can be taken in as well.
This sounds a lot like pro race mixing. On the contrary, borders need to be heavily fortified and all indigenous races returned to their homelands.
>more slavery talk
And yet another chance for jews to point to us and say we're evil, while taking the side of the slaves they brought over. That's already some tired old shit.
>elected leaders are relocated to the antarctic for the duration of their term, doing nothing but oversee their people
I don't see how leaders could oversee their people without being among them.
>rather than engage themselves in frivolous luxuries.
That should be made law, and strictly enforced not by majority avoided as many laws towards the wealthy and white collar crimes are.


Anonymous 01/13/2020 (Mon) 11:17:34 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.78233 del
Here's a suggestion post not contrary to National Socialism, going more into what I said with these screenshots to add as visual aids. Some may rail against the fact I'm using a video game. I'm doing so to make a point. Gestapo instead of FBI will be the new G men. They only identify themselves to the enemy with swastika pins to intimidate, easily removed and stored in one's pocket for walking around in public. Their clothing will identify them to rest of us. There needs to be a way to raise numbers and families away from the degenerate messages of mass media jewry the the brainwashed poisonous influence. Sustainable underground vaults. Securing the existence of our people and a future for white children. Reject most modernity. In public, dress the old more traditional ways. Civilian operatives and informants should be identified by a superficial commonality, such as a fake prosthetic scar. Each leader of a safehouse (underground bunker) determines what the local civilian ops use to identify to each other. As for the sustainable vaults, there would be non-perishable food items as well as gardening planters, water supply acquisition and sewage disposal. Our children would be raised taught the truth, not typical jewish historical lies and prepared for a future outside the vault with physical training. A future where they would not have to obtain a profession and submit to ZOG, but become civilian operatives and return home to the bunker to sustain their lives every day. These vaults should be numerous. Splinter cells, broken up so that if one is raided there are many more left that learn from past mistakes. No vault residents will be aware of where another one is, in case of interrogation.


Anonymous 01/13/2020 (Mon) 15:48:36 Id: 7d1216 [Preview] No.78235 del
>>78225
you are top down, I am bottom up. I think taking things slow is best, you want immediate change. Yet we both want similar things.

I, too, would prefer having non-whites moved to their indigenous homelands, but there are myriad problems with this suggestion:

First, most non-whites we will be dealing have been born and raised in out lands, and simply shipping them to their lands of their parents is going to be difficult if the same applies to them, or if the parents come from different locations.

Second, they will not go willingly, even richie spencer's idea of "just paying them to leave" is not going to be enough of an incentive to get them to go. Besides, most of the countries we'd try to send them to will not want to take them, and how are we going to convince other countries to take them? no way will other countries simply accept some payment for taking people in. In both cases, we keep paying and paying, they keep milking and milking, and it becomes a parasitic relationship to replace the one we are already facing, and they can simply refuse to keep their end, or just ignore the rules they are told to follow, or simply send more people in knowing we will pay them to take them back, they won't play fair, most of the countries we are dealing with are super corrupt, and they hate us. If we are going to force them to leave we are talking about a civil war, if we are going to force other countries to take them in we are having an outright war, finally, if we go down this road, we cannot expect a good response from other third party countries, especially if they are under jewish control.

it's better to just rely upon the separation within the country that comes about naturally due to human nature of like seeing like, if we give people the right to choose what happens with their person and property, such as the right of a business owner to discriminate on who can be served or hired for their business on any basis they wish, people will naturally refuse to associate with other races over time.

add to that a complete removal of the state in affairs outside enforcing the most minimalistic of laws (NAP), and those who make bad decisions are going to suffer for consequences of those decisions, without the welfare state to bail them out, the populations of white will rise, and the populations of non-whites will go down, again over time.

sure, it's separation within the country rather than a purified country, but it's at least a start, and maybe it could leads to the complete ethnostate down the line. NWS minarchism favors whites because meritocracy favors whites.

last, white women being owned by white men, it is at least a good transitional state where females produce plenty children and feel better about themselves, choices are removed from them entirely, noting is their fault, all they have to do is submit and serve. It's paradise for them. and it will help them, to rediscover their roots and their feminine nature.

I expect most white gentile males will act justly and benevolently, for the most part, and that the best slaves will receive the best treatment, the best genes will proliferate, as the worst are killed off, and desired traits are selected for. wolves into dogs.


Anonymous 01/13/2020 (Mon) 15:48:54 Id: 7d1216 [Preview] No.78236 del
>>78225
as for banking, The USA has a sate bank, as did the UK, and France, and everywhere else in the world that adopted a jewish bank, it was the state banks which gave way to the jewish banks, precisely because the state had the power to hand the banks over to the jews, by taking banks out of government hands and decentralizing them, and removing all state protections from them, there would be no way for a jewish bank to seize control of a nation's money, lots of jewish practices will be eliminated due to their lack of advantage in a competitive free market, interest will disappear replaced with banking fees, so will fiat currency be replaced by representative banknotes (a lot faster without a government backing to money in the first place), fractional reserve lending will vanish due to the increased visibility and demand for transparency of our time. Technology is a huge game-changer here.

slavery is simply a consequence of removing NAP protections from all but white gentile males, it is not something there would be a special law for, and no matter what the jews will make us out to be monsters, I don't give a fuck what the jews of the future will say.

one thing I suspect is that jews will likely be eliminated quickly within the nations borders.

no one should be allowed to leave because even one person could spill secrets to betray us, no one comes in because jews can arrive pretending to be white, and anyone arriving from outside may be an enemy.

no goods shall pass the borders, either, as any trade, import, export etc, could make us reliant upon a nation which will hate us, no letters or shipments either, as those can also be dangerous for obvious reasons.

the only contact with the outside will be through the link we already have with them by the internet.


Anonymous 01/13/2020 (Mon) 16:16:24 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.78238 del
>>78235
First off, "Richie Spencer" is a kike. A flat out jew. He wants Zionism. The rest of his message is typical subterfuge. I'm not talking about only "simply shipping them to their lands / immediate change" right now under our current system and causing civil war. That would be pointless. My points were about following a National Socialist movement risen to power. The post here: >>78233 is a precursor to that. Resistance at first. Many cells taking back everything we can little by little. Fighting the battles we can win until the movement can come to power. Deportations aren't going to happen until after National Socialism rises worldwide. Only then will other nations cooperate.
>the right of a business owner to discriminate on who can be served or hired for their business
Not possible under the current system, and you just finished talking about not starting a civil war. Race wars and black marches have happened in the past, enflamed by jews wailing at them about the rights kikes took away in the first place by kidnapping the negro and bringing them over to sell as slaves.
>add to that a complete removal of the state in affairs outside enforcing the most minimalistic of laws
The Third Reich was a state which had heavy enforcement, and the result was Germans felt free to walk their streets free of crime.
>those who make bad decisions are going to suffer for consequences of those decisions, without the welfare state to bail them out,
You seem to think only non whites are poor and only they have welfare.
>the populations of white will rise, and the populations of non-whites will go down, again over time
The wealthy will rise higher (kikes by majority) and the poor will increase. Bad idea.
>sure, it's separation within the country rather than a purified country, but it's at least a start
The start needs to be to seize power from the parasite first. Take back everything they have to use against us. (continued)


Anonymous 01/13/2020 (Mon) 16:47:52 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.78239 del
(337.35 KB 1899x1079 3 (3).jpg)
>>78235
>NWS minarchism favors whites because meritocracy favors whites.
NWS. A night-watchman state Libertarian philosophy coined by the anarcho-libertarian Samuel Edward Konkin III and supported by kike Libertarian Ludwig von Mises. So you're not for National Socialism, you're for jewish Libertarianism. You are on the wrong board, m8.
>last, white women being owned by white men, it is at least a good transitional state where females produce plenty children and feel better about themselves, etc etc
Opening things up for jews to kvetch about women's rights and yet again place them above us in the eventual shit-show. It doesn't seem to matter how many times you're told slavery is not going to work, look at history. Because it's an old jewish merchant tradition later used to blame indigenous Europeans. You keep shilling slavery.
>>78236
>as for banking, The USA has a sate bank, as did the UK, and France, and everywhere else in the world that adopted a jewish bank
Those are not Central banks. There are thousands of "interest rates" (usury) practicing banks as the Federal Reserve and Treasury ruin the economy, to have the rich gain from the working class. Vid related.
>by representative banknotes (a lot faster without a government backing to money in the first place)
Money already isn't "backed" by anything. I don't recommend continuing with fraudulent pieces of paper which act as speculative credit and nothing more.
>slavery is simply a consequence of removing NAP protections from all but white gentile males
The consequence will be race wars, with more rights given to the non-whites and kikes using them as their golem against ancestral indigenous Europeans, just as it is now.
>and no matter what the jews will make us out to be monsters, I don't give a fuck what the jews of the future will say.
Not giving a fuck about jewish subversion tactics which they'll use to remove white rights, is ridiculous. Enough normies already are mired in shit and don't give a fuck. That's one of the major problems. Complacency about the parasite destroying all of us.
>one thing I suspect is that jews will likely be eliminated quickly within the nations borders.
In a Libertarian night-watchman nation? Not very likely. Kikes fathered Libertarianism.
>no one should be allowed to leave because even one person could spill secrets to betray us
They can do so anyway without ever leaving. I'll cover that in the last response of this post.
>no one comes in because jews can arrive pretending to be white, and anyone arriving from outside may be an enemy.
So no one coming in or out. We're stuck with the same non-whites we already have. Negros everywhere, Mexicans everywhere, white women traitors with those niggers and beaners breeding out their entire ancestry and culture.
>no goods shall pass the borders, either, as any trade, import, export etc, could make us reliant upon a nation which will hate us
This is the only part I agree with. All foreign trade needs to be cut off to provide jobs in the nation to it's own citizens.
>the only contact with the outside will be through the link we already have with them by the internet.
And there's how "even one person could spill secrets to betray us". Right there. I suggest you drop Libertarianism and embrace National Socialism.


Anonymous 01/13/2020 (Mon) 16:49:35 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.78240 del
>>78239
The video didn't post. Trying again.


Anonymous 01/13/2020 (Mon) 22:55:47 Id: 7d1216 [Preview] No.78246 del
national socialism is unmarketable, it's way outside of the overton window, this we both agree on, and if you disagree, you are completely blind in a way most /pol/acks are not.
We all know that we are hated, and that is why we cannot simply go outside wearing our hearts on our sleeves.

So I think "what do we want to achieve?" and "how can we achieve our goals", libertarianism is not as publicly maligned as national socialism, it is still marketable to the normal folk, yet it is also a system that can, with time, achieve many of the things natsocs want to see.

the two ideologies are surprisingly similar, and that is why the "libertarian to natsoc pipleine" is a thing, a change seen since the very first /pol/.

as for which ideologies are coined by jews and which aren't, I don't care. who came up with an idea or lends it support is of no interest to me, and it should not be to you either, what matters is whether the idea, if implemented would give us what we want.

if it is a good idea, I care not who has come up with it, often I will not take an idea in it's entirety, tell me, would ludwig von mises approve of what society I have envisioned? where jews are denied all access and all men are not created equal? I've taken components useful to whites and added more policies that favor whites as well, and I am clear to ensure that jews are not favored in the least by this system.

calling me out by the source of my ideas rather than addressing the flaws in the ideas themselves is the tactic of a shillbot, jews have endorsed every ideology tat has ever existed, natsoc included (freud fell on his knees and thanked god when hitler won), just because your enemy claims to endorse something is not adequate reason to scrap everything that is there, never let your enemy control how you are allowed to think.


Anonymous 01/13/2020 (Mon) 22:56:04 Id: 7d1216 [Preview] No.78247 del
we want a traditional family to become the norm again.
we want an ethnostate where white people have full ownership of the politics of their counties.
we want a free and productive society, liberated from jewish control and jewish practices.
we want a restoration of the global white population.
we want white people to feel pride in their race, and to see their race as like a family to which they were born.
we want to see humanity take to the stars, to claim the galaxy and beyond, to advance to the highest level of achievement that we can reach.
we want peace, an end to constant war, we want prosperity, an end to constant debt, we want truth, and end to constant confusion, ignorance, and falsehoods.
we are a movement of the future, not the past, or forging a society never seen before, and far removed from the prophetic divinations of marx and his cult of evil.
we want our spirituality as a people restored, be it pagan, christian, or even atheist, so long as it is our own, one which we claim fort ourselves, instead of to belong to some community whose only interest is in directing our every thought and action.
we want the jew and the shitskin peoples to live far apart from us, we want nothing to do with them, perhaps we wish for their eventual destruction, jewish influence must be removed at any cost as the parasite will eventualy destroy any society it is managed to infect.

If there is anything I am lacking, tell me, I may have forgot some of the things we seek. But from this list, and what I have written, you know I am a national socialist, I am a national socialist who is of the libertarian ideology. if you've seen murdoch murdoch, you know that you can be both a libertarian and a national socialist, that natsoc is not just a political ideology, but an ideology of what is most important to you and what you work towards, my race, me land, my culture, my nation.

any set of political policies that I think is the best for these things is what I pursue and that is what makes me a natsoc. murdoch murdoch taught me this.

finally, the jews will not win again after we succeed, so why care what they say about how horrible we are, they already think we are the worst thing ever. stop talking like we are going to fail, that is how a demoralizer thinks. the jews will never rile women up about our misogyny, because they wont be around to, and women will not have the power to complain.

here is an idea, make it explicit that jews are not white, and require genetic tests at birth to determine one's jewishness, then require that tattoos are made on the foreheads of the baby kike to show them for what they are, presenting the tests is a requirement for any employment, voting, running for office, etc. so jews having kids off the grid will have to remain off the grid, and will be disposed of once they become pests.


Anonymous 01/13/2020 (Mon) 23:00:30 Id: 7d1216 [Preview] No.78248 del
as I've banned intellectual property to undermine media control, and make free speech absolute, allowing even CP and Snuff and Threats and "Hate Speech" and "Safe Spaces" and Slander and Libel, and yelling "fire" in a crowded theatre, etc. all to remove any possibility of speech or expression being controlled, and also forcing innovators to live off the innovations rather than off the rights to their creations. (I hate pedos, the (((pedos))) in (((hebrewood))) especially, I'd like to have them castrated and tortured for the rest of their lives, and I hate (((porn))) in general, it's degenerate, soul-destroying, and mind-ruining, I don't watch it and I do not masturbate, I don't even have sex and wont until marriage to a tradwife who is genetically pure and virginal and who wishes for a family, even then I will never use contraception and only have sex with her when I want to have children, and only in the manner that can produce pregnancy, my concerns are practical here, without jewish control, I expect all forms of porn and child molestation to die a relatively quick death)

I will also ban circumcision, and define life as beginning at the union of egg and sperm, thus banning abortion as well.

age of adulthood set at the average age when a white gentile male finishes puberty.

allowing anything to be said online does not merely mean a loss of state secrets, as we will know what they are communicating, it will be generally transparent, and secondly, they will have trouble knowing what info is credible or not without face to face communication.


Anonymous 01/13/2020 (Mon) 23:04:16 Id: 7d1216 [Preview] No.78249 del
Jews will be slaves in my NWS minarchist society.
They will be marked. those evading a mark will lack the identification required to enter society at any level, I could add more restrictions to those who do not submit the proper identification, maybe identification on getting an investment from a bank? maybe identification required to own land or slaves? maybe identification is required to move from place to place within the country?.


Anonymous 01/14/2020 (Tue) 00:14:10 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.78252 del
>>78246
>national socialism is unmarketable
I wasn't aware you were a merchant. I'm not a merchant.
>it's way outside of the overton window
I don't give a damn what's not marketable or accepted by modern society. The jewish lies have to be brought to life and National Socialism must rise against kikes again. It was villainized and fought against as it rose in Germany. The same tactics used back then to cause it's rise have never been utilized again.
>libertarianism is not as publicly maligned as national socialism, it is still marketable to the normal folk
Yet you're promoting a wholly jewish ideal on a National Socialist board. This is a high form of shilling on your part.
>the two ideologies are surprisingly similar,
No they're not. Libertarianism is closer to Marxist Communism. Anti private ownership. Libertarians view property as a hindrance to the hollow jewish brainwashing phrases "freedom" and "liberty'.
>and that is why the "libertarian to natsoc pipleine" is a thing
From Libertarians to National Socialists? That's called waking up.
>as for which ideologies are coined by jews and which aren't, I don't care.
I care when those arrive to promote jewish agendas on this board, to the point they're told to fuck off and get banned.
>who came up with an idea or lends it support is of no interest to me, and it should not be to you either
Oh, but it does. When jews are the origin of an agenda, the entire ideology can eat shit and die.
>would ludwig von mises approve of what society I have envisioned?
Only because it excludes his own kind. Publicly, he wouldn't. Privately, just as any jew, he wants the slavery you promoted for his people. The enslavement of all of us, as it is in the wicked religion of Judaism.
>where jews are denied all access and all men are not created equal?
Not the first part, because kikes are tribal and support their own. The only support given to others is for the purposes of division.
>calling me out by the source of my ideas rather than addressing the flaws in the ideas themselves is the tactic of a shillbot
Haha, that's rich after you've shilled ((Libertarianism))? You believe I'm a bot? That an AI is responding in detail to these messages? Are you that batshit insane?
>freud fell on his knees and thanked god when hitler won
I'm going to need a source for that.
>just because your enemy claims to endorse something is not adequate reason to scrap everything that is there
Not just endorsed. Created. They made it when they plagiarized Dialogue in Hell between Machiavelli and Montesquieu as their Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
>>78247
>we want etc etc
You're describing primary white nationalism with many aspects of National Socialism, not Libertarianism. The two ideologies definitely do not coincide.
>you know I am a national socialist, I am a national socialist who is of the libertarian ideology
You might as well call yourself a National Socialist adherent of the religion of Judaism. For fuck's sakes. No self respecting National Socialist suddenly doesn't care what jews came up with and then follows their ideals like the rest of the blind sheep. No true National Socialist doesn't care what kikes came up with and blindly follows their propaganda. This does not make sense.
>any set of political policies that I think is the best for these things is what I pursue
Right. I'll go ahead and summarize the bullshit you thought was best: "Don't cast out the immigrants. Keep them in but enslave them. Don't allow natives to their nations in because they'll share secrets they could over the internet anyway. Also enslave white women." Distinctly against National Socialist values. I'm starting to wonder if you even know what the hell National Socialism is. I might have to explain it to your Libertarian brainwashed mind later on. Though time and again, that's been a useless endeavor.
>the jews will not win again after we succeed, so why care what they say about how horrible we are
How are you not aware of their history and victory of lies?


Anonymous 01/14/2020 (Tue) 00:44:38 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.78253 del
>>78247
Continued: A history where kikes provoked WW2 despite Hitler's many offers of peace to other nations. When kike producer Billy Wilder (a script writer for German films until he fled when Hitler rose to power) weaseled his way into Buchenwald with Allied forces and staged the first dumbest accusations of jew skin soap, lampshades, shrunken heads, pelvisbone ashtrays and tattooed orthodox kike human skin. A lie that "evolved" among Hollywood with an even older dumbass accusation. The false death of 6 million jews shilled since 1869. https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/search/pages/results/?state=&date1=1836&date2=1922&proxtext=6000000+jews&x=11&y=17&dateFilterType=yearRange&rows=20&searchType=basic And yet you think you can rouse support of Libertarianism among National Socialists worldwide? Because worldwide is the only way. You're better off promoting these ideas to edgy Atomwaffen teens. Or maybe not. They're likely to kill you instead when you bring up that you're Libertarian. They are violent retards.
>stop talking like we are going to fail, that is how a demoralizer thinks.
Libertarianism is destined to fail because it is a jewish agenda. There is no "we" in this. Only you are promoting this bullshit. No National Socialist with awareness of both ideologies' histories is going to be on board with this.
>>78248
>as I've banned intellectual property to undermine media control,
Which makes it so you're unable to enforce your objective by your own media messages. Destroying any resemblance of promoting your ideology to the masses.
>and make free speech absolute, allowing even CP and Snuff
Muh free speech is bullshit. And of course you mention the very reasons it's wrong. CP and snuff. Typical of a Libertarian, you're calling for that which Liberals are truly for: jewish anarchy.
>and Threats and "Hate Speech" and "Safe Spaces"
Allowing free speech does not allow for safe spaces.
>and Slander and Libel, and yelling "fire" in a crowded theatre, etc. all to remove any possibility of speech or expression being controlled,
I wasn't aware child porn was expression. You know, it's pretty fucked up that you would call for a society that allows it. Another to add to the list along with slavery.
>and also forcing innovators to live off the innovations rather than off the rights to their creations.
>(I hate pedos, the (((pedos))) in (((hebrewood))) especially, I'd like to have them castrated and tortured for the rest of their lives,
Yet you would allow CP. Doesn't make sense.
>and I hate (((porn))) in general, it's degenerate, soul-destroying, and mind-ruining, I don't watch it and I do not masturbate, I don't even have sex and wont until marriage to a tradwife who is genetically pure and virginal and who wishes for a family,
Then why permit it? For the "freedoms" of others to engage in absolute degeneracy?
>without jewish control, I expect all forms of porn and child molestation to die a relatively quick death)
Such things exist in non jewish nations already. I was aware of such filth back when alt.binaries was unmoderated in the 90s and disgusting CP was everywhere. Molestation and porn have already infiltrated. It's not enough to completely allow everything, because after the parasitic causes are removed, the material must be as well.
>I will also ban circumcision, and define life as beginning at the union of egg and sperm, thus banning abortion as well.
That is one statement I don't have a problem with.
>age of adulthood set at the average age when a white gentile male finishes puberty.
15 and 16 year olds are not adults. I would raise the age to 25.
>allowing anything to be said online does not merely mean a loss of state secrets, as we will know what they are communicating, it will be generally transparent,
I wasn't talking about public internet discussions. Code, encryption, different languages would be sent out.
>and secondly, they will have trouble knowing what info is credible or not without face to face communication.
Which action a double agent is likely to engage in already.


Anonymous 01/14/2020 (Tue) 00:51:23 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.78254 del
(144.08 KB 865x419 150.jpg)
>>78249
>Jews will be slaves in my NWS minarchist society.
>They will be marked. those evading a mark will lack the identification required to enter society at any level,
Are they entering society but also slaves? You're not making sense again. As slaves, they wouldn't be permitted to "enter society" in the first place.
>I could add more restrictions to those who do not submit the proper identification, maybe identification on getting an investment from a bank?
"Banking as identification" doesn't sound very non-jewish to me.
>maybe identification required to own land or slaves?
Own land? No one's allowed to own in a Libertarian society. That goes against muh Liberty and muh Freedoms. Come on now.
>maybe identification is required to move from place to place within the country?
Identification alone won't tell you if someone is a jew. Extensive research into their family tree will. By the way, here have this pic related. These are the type of faggots you're identifying with.


Anonymous 01/14/2020 (Tue) 02:06:08 Id: 130cbb [Preview] No.78255 del
>>78254
I made it clear by what i meant by "enter society", I described it on detail.

Ok, the identification is recieved as a result of a genetic test. Which is a much better test for jewishness than some family tree. Jews are genetically distinct from whites, even partial jews are clearly told from pureblood whites.

Yes it could infringe on freedoms, but fighting the jew shapeshifting justifies this, besides, newsflash, jews atent white, therefore in my society they would have to tights ti begin with, identification requirements only exist to detect shapeshifting jews.


Im not intereated in principles, only in practical utility. What do the policies do, and how do i know they would so what i think they will? How can i get what i want with the least amount of policies?

When it comes to CP, it is merely a btproduct of the larger policy of not regulating speech or expression, or media, or information, or art, or communication in any way. Its in the same category as abolishing all forms of intellectual property. And that is all.

Why? Because any restriction on what one can say or see or do with their own person or peoperty is going to invite more restrictions down the line, kikes prosper in slippery slopes, we need there to be mo orecedent for them to use to make things worse.

Not worried abt kikes per se, moreso the traitor whites they get to do that stuff on their behalf. Besides, a completely untestricted internet appeals to me, imagine an imageboard with literally no rules on posting. Where anything can be shared. That was what kind of environment drew me to imageboards like this in the first place, and now i want to see the long term effects of that being taken to the utmost extreme.

It also creates spaces where the rest of the world cannot follow. What with the restrictions on speech becoming more and more draconian.

All this and more justifies allowing even that which i find most reprehensible.

It frees media and invention to lack IP, because jews sit on patents and copyrights, using them for their own fame and fortune and influence (eg. Einstein), and to strangle the creative pursuits of whites (eg. Takedowns).

That is my interest.


Anonymous 01/14/2020 (Tue) 02:47:51 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.78262 del
(192.00 KB 715x928 1.jpg)
(93.46 KB 1022x890 25 points 1.png)
(93.19 KB 1039x724 25 points 2.png)
(79.88 KB 1054x679 25 points 3.png)
>>78255
>I made it clear by what i meant by "enter society", I described it on detail.
Yeah. Slavery. Keeping them here. Keeping the division sewing jews here so nothing can be solved at all. So that they break free and pull their typical cries of "oppression!". Not only would you succeed in furthering their goal to villainize ancestral indigenous Europeans, you would trade the stigma of black slavery falsely heaped on all white labeled people instead of the jewish Marranos where it belongs, in exchange for kikes being able to cry about the holocaust fraud AND more modern slavery than their bullshit about ancient Egyptian times. Fuck, I think jews might go willingly to gain that future. You're setting them up to gain more control with their natural victim complexes.
>Ok, the identification is recieved as a result of a genetic test.
>Which is a much better test for jewishness than some family tree.
No it's not. Haplogroups R-M17 (R1a) and R-P25 (R1b) used to identify "Ashkenazi jews" are present in non-Ashkenazi Jewish populations and in non-Jewish Near Eastern populations. Then there are the Sephardi jews, which can mean either jews expelled from Spain and Portugal or "any non-Ashkenazi jew expelled from Muslim lands". The Jews of North Africa, their paternal haplotypes are almost equal to those of the Lebanese and Palestinian non-Jews. And then all other studies refer to either Ashkenazi or Sephardi origins. The jews are so bred with other races, their genetics are such a clusterfuck that they're most prone to genetic diseases. Experts studying genealogy with expertise on jewish surnames would be certain of anyone's kike heritage.
>besides, newsflash, jews atent white, therefore in my society they would have to tights ti begin with
Ashkenazi can pass as white as they intentionally bred with Europeans, even though they're not, as a 5th column. I'm disappointed you're not aware of this. Look at what trouble kikes get themselves into when they play that game. And pic related.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6864575/Famous-civil-rights-group-accused-systemic-racism-sexism.html
>Im not intereated in principles, only in practical utility. What do the policies do, and how do i know they would so what i think they will?
The results of your hypothetical policies has already been explained many times. Here are the 25 points of National Socialism. Familiarize yourself.
>When it comes to CP, it is merely a btproduct of the larger policy of not regulating speech or expression, or media, or information, or art, or communication in any way.
Which is flawed, because it allows CP.
>Its in the same category as abolishing all forms of intellectual property. And that is all.
That is not all. Covered next.
>Why? Because any restriction on what one can say or see or do with their own person or peoperty is going to invite more restrictions down the line
One: That is completely the opposite of Liberalism, which seeks to remove property entirely. Two: You would be welcoming chaos and degeneracy, unchecked.
>kikes prosper in slippery slopes, we need there to be mo orecedent for them to use to make things worse.
Precedent for them to make things worse has already been planned out with your many hypothetical policies. They may like this chaotic freedom you opened up as they were slaves, and then merely call for it again when they're free to whine about having been slaves.
>Not worried abt kikes per se, moreso the traitor whites they get to do that stuff on their behalf.
Both are a problem. Traitors and the parasitic enemy.
>Besides, a completely untestricted internet appeals to me, imagine an imageboard with literally no rules on posting.
I don't need to imagine. Do you even fucking read my replies? Goddamn. alt.binaries WAS that in the 1990s. There was child porn everywhere. Images of child torture. Gore. Videos of people getting their heads cut off slowly with knives and chainsaws. Basically half pedophilia and half the precursor to somethingawful.com (continued)


Anonymous 01/14/2020 (Tue) 02:58:59 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.78263 del
(40.82 KB 620x437 hideous.jpg)
>>78255
>Where anything can be shared. That was what kind of environment drew me to imageboards like this in the first place, and now i want to see the long term effects of that being taken to the utmost extreme.
>All this and more justifies allowing even that which i find most reprehensible.
You claim to hate pedos but want to see CP among the chaos of muh freedoms. This is strange behavior. Contradictory in nature. Deflection off actual intent is something pedophiles are known to do. I suggest never calling for the freedom to post child porn. Ever.
>It frees media and invention to lack IP, because jews sit on patents and copyrights,
The jews also sit on propaganda. Which by allowing media "freedom" grants them the ability to hide behind it. Freedom is as meaningless a term as the phrase "freedom of the press", which is used as a false front by jew journalists to completely lock down the press and only publish their interests.
Now. There is a .pdf I linked to with the intent that you read through it. Witness how you are controlled through calls of liberty and fraternity here: >>78252 Read it.
>using them for their own fame and fortune and influence (eg. Einstein), and to strangle the creative pursuits of whites (eg. Takedowns).
Fortune allows them to control the press. Without their money, jews are nothing. Not athletic. Not creative. Not noble or honorable. Only scrawny, lecherous cockroaches.


Anonymous 01/14/2020 (Tue) 05:08:40 Id: 7d1216 [Preview] No.78264 del
here is another idea of mine, make the DSM local to the country, and instigate a reexamination of the DSM, reclassify LGBT+ as mental illnesses (especially transgenderism) in order to make "transitioning" or "acceptance" based treatments into malpractice.

and keep the sex-obsessed, disease-ridden trannies and faggots away from my kids.


Anonymous 01/14/2020 (Tue) 05:08:58 Id: 7d1216 [Preview] No.78265 del
(or any kids, for that matter)


Anonymous 01/14/2020 (Tue) 05:12:49 Id: 7d1216 [Preview] No.78266 del
jews will whine. they will never stop. quite trying to think we will somehow be making things worse for ourselves in the long run. If anything, us completely BTFOing them will make them respect us enough to stop treating us like the worst possible thing to ever exist. and even wen they do, we throw it in their faces and say "we have a long record of how you made us into that, all the abuse you put us through, your attempts to destroy us, your fraud, your lies, your foreign occupational armies of the third world, this is all your doing, we became what we did to deal with your actions, you have no one to blame for this but yourselves"

and this regime will never end once it has been put into place, it is perfect.


Anonymous 01/14/2020 (Tue) 05:14:03 Id: 7d1216 [Preview] No.78267 del
jewish propaganda thrives only in criticism free environments, allowing anyone to take a shot at them drowns them out, they require a vaccum to sell their snake oil.

the internet exists now, stop pretending it doesnt


Anonymous 01/14/2020 (Tue) 10:25:40 Id: 7d1216 [Preview] No.78269 del
"libertarian-type ideas originated from the jews" - no, the idea that one owns their persona and property and has exclusive control over what is done with either is one of the oldest ideas in human history, older than human civilization itself. Think about how human societies and civilizations formed and evolved in the first place and you will come to understand that "what's yours is yours and what's mine is mine" is the first compromise that allowed people to live together. the NAP is covered by every system of laws to exist in Europe, (admittedly with some unnecessary bullshit tacked on), and all kike "philosophers" did was put down some terminology to it to help sell the idea.

Even if it was an idea borne solely of jewish thought, if it has within it the inspiration for the policies which best serve the white race, I will take whatever I can use from it. I judge ideas based upon the effects they will have once implemented, not the source.

Do not let the enemy control what you are allowed to think.

"you wish to allow something you dislike, that's contradictory" - we all are willing to tolerate the things we dislike if there are greater reasons to do so, I've explained in detail that allowing ANY regulation to govern anything beyond physical interactions based on property or person, opens the door to further control of communication (and thus, thought) down the line, no matter how common sense or noble the reasoning is, if there is a precedent, certain groups will use that to justify more legislation that favors them. You have never even tried to argue this point.

"you are a jew" - no, I am not, and the source of a claim does not justify rejecting it, we analyze the claims themselves, we do not attack the sources as a substitute for proper argumentation.

"just do things that make the media react, then people will come to us" - One, you are relying upon the enemies actions to make your plan work, the enemy is not just jews, but jew-aligned whites, shitskins, and all manner of subhumans. Two, just because people distrust and are dissatisfied with the media does not mean that they will like us, especially just because the media shits on us, it's more possible that they will gravitate to kike gatekeepers like juden peterstein or prager university, who also condemn us, but are also maligned by the media themselves, and act as a "happy medium" most people are gravitating towards.
Three - national socialism is more than a simple political system, it is whatever system of personal and ideological beliefs most concern themselves with the betterment if one's people, one's land, one's pride, one's nature, etc.
blood, soil, honor, glory, people, tradition, nation.
Your political beliefs can be somewhat libertarian, and you can still be a national socialist, if you truly consider those policies to be in your people's best interests, and that is your chief concern. however, my ideas are not completely libertarian, there is a lot of nationalism here too.


Anonymous 01/14/2020 (Tue) 10:25:59 Id: 7d1216 [Preview] No.78270 del
"what about freedoms? you can't mix and match policies that on't all fit eh same themes" ok, first they do all fit the same themes, they are what I believe result in the best society for whites that we can build right now.
second, I do not give a fuck about principle, I care about results, I'm a practical thinker, said tat time and time again here.
Forcing identification of Jews is a good way of removing shapeshifters from our midst, and a blood test is a superior method of finding jewish ancestry than some antiquated family tree. even heavily diluted Jews are genetically distinct from aryan stock, it's the best system to use here.
also, identification is going to be used by citizens anyway, so adding verification that they are not jews is a simple addition to include, and requiring a show of such an ID (which is impossible for a jew to get without damn good forgery), in certain critical situations effectively locks them out of entering society.

"slavery is a jewish thing" - we are not importing people from another race into our country, that is jewish slave practices the tragedy they were for our countries, we are merely removing legal protection from anyone who is not a white male, and with the closing of the borders, both in-to-out and out-to-in, we will ensure that there will be no changes to the population that do not emerge naturally and domestically.

"just do everything by law, ban everything you dislike, force people to relocate (or die), nationalize everything you ant to control etc." - emergent racial separation, emergent return of sex roles, emergent correction of banking and economic practices, these hold far stronger than top-down mandates of the state, they are slower, taking a generation of two, but the result is worth it.
bottom up is always superior to top down, because the people involved in making the change can only blame themselves for their personal choices, and because it reveals telling details about their own natures to them. For an intelligent race, there is no stronger validation.

"jews/women will kvetch about our actions" - when will they not? how can we possibly make anything worse than they are now in that regard? they are already openly calling for our heads, and besides, they will same the same things if we went with your solutions, too. At the very least, we will show the world what their "worst case scenario" actually looks like when put into practice, rather than their fiction and fear mongering.
In the age of the internet, when everything happens live and things are never forgotten, this isn't the 80's or earlier, where large scale events could still be covered up.


Anonymous 01/14/2020 (Tue) 11:15:54 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.78271 del
(190.36 KB 750x1037 32.jpg)
>>78264
Files related.
>>78266
>quite trying to think we will somehow be making things worse for ourselves in the long run.
Not if you follow their own fucking ideals and immortalize Libertarianism.
>If anything, us completely BTFOing them will make them respect us enough to stop treating us like the worst possible thing to ever exist.
The jews respecting non-jews after enslaving them? Are you that delusional?
>and this regime will never end once it has been put into place, it is perfect.
No. Enforcing a Libertarian slavery regime where no natives to the nations are allowed in or invaders allowed out is retarded. Not perfect.
>>78267
>the internet exists now, stop pretending it doesnt
When I told you I've been on it since the 1990s, I didn't realize the message was the internet doesn't exist. Your attention span is seriously fucked up.
>>78269
>"libertarian-type ideas originated from the jews" - no,
Yes. John Locke was the origin. He was known as the renegade jew against Britain. His promotion of "all religions" was simply to permit his religion of Judaism and he laid the building blocks of jewish control over Britain. Along with the jewish fathers of Libertarianism I showed you before, now you know for certain Libertarianism is a jewish agenda. I've been lenient with you so far due to your hatred of kikes while promoting kike ideals. I won't be after this. The red text about promoting jewish degeneracy (especially after that "allow CP" bullshit of yours) means you will either stop promoting jewish agendas or I'll continue banning you until you fuck off.
>the idea that one owns their persona and property and has exclusive control over what is done with either
>is one of the oldest ideas in human history, older than human civilization itself.
No it's not. Human beings have possessed property since the beginning of time. Stop promoting Marxist Communism, kid.
>Even if it was an idea borne solely of jewish thought, if it has within it the inspiration for the policies which best serve the white race, I will take whatever I can use from it. I judge ideas based upon the effects they will have once implemented, not the source.
You don't care if jews came up with it, you'll promote jewish agendas anyway for the "white race" blanket label. Newsflash: white is not a race. If you think that and you're not aware of your own ancestry, you're part of the problem.
>Do not let the enemy control what you are allowed to think.
After you incessantly posted promotion of Libertarianism and slavery, this is a hilarious statement.
>we all are willing to tolerate the things we dislike if there are greater reasons to do so
THERE IS NO REASON TO TOLERATE CHILD PORN. Whatsoever.
>I've explained in detail that allowing ANY regulation to govern anything beyond physical interactions based on property or person, opens the door to further control of communication (and thus, thought) down the line, no matter how common sense or noble the reasoning is, if there is a precedent, certain groups will use that to justify more legislation that favors them.
The whole point is to gain control. You're never going to be able to implement your "anti jew Libertarian Communism" without gaining control. Of course certain groups will justify legislation that favors them. That is why National Socialists justifying the truth, that jews need to be expelled from society, would be the best legislation.
>"you are a jew" - no, I am not,
I never said you were. I asked if you were a merchant because you said National Socialism was not marketable. Stop making shit up.
>and the source of a claim does not justify rejecting it, we analyze the claims themselves, we do not attack the sources as a substitute for proper argumentation.
When the source of an ideal is jews, that alone justifies rejecting it. Socialism did not originate from jews. It originated from Mazdak the Zoroastrian. Of course when kikes are behind the source, the source deserves to be attacked. Stop deluding yourself into thinking otherwise.


Anonymous 01/14/2020 (Tue) 11:25:53 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.78272 del
(3.23 MB 2500x1564 493 (2).jpg)
>>78269
>One, you are relying upon the enemies actions to make your plan work, the enemy is not just jews, but jew-aligned whites, shitskins, and all manner of subhumans.
The jews are the main enemy. Without removing them from controlling nations, it is impossible to deal with their golem.
>Two, just because people distrust and are dissatisfied with the media does not mean that they will like us, especially just because the media shits on us,
The point is that the media advertises. That is how numbers of a movement are gained. While they will speak outrageous lies, more and more people will attend meetings. The NSDAP was banned an unbanned over and over again in Germany while the jewish press's constant deceits brought more members steadily to meetings until that party rose from 7 to millions. It's because people attended the meetings to see what the press was talking about, and were drawn in by the truth instead.
>it's more possible that they will gravitate to kike gatekeepers like juden peterstein or prager university, who also condemn us, but are also maligned by the media themselves, and act as a "happy medium" most people are gravitating towards.
"They're maligned by the media but they're successful but if you're maligned by the media you won't be successful" makes absolutely no sense.
>Three - national socialism is more than a simple political system, it is whatever system of personal and ideological beliefs most concern themselves with the betterment if one's people, one's land, one's pride, one's nature, etc. blood, soil, honor, glory, people, tradition, nation.
Is it not whatever system of ideological beliefs you choose to identify with, even if it's Marxist Communism. That's bullshit. Come on now.
>Your political beliefs can be somewhat libertarian, and you can still be a national socialist,
No you can't. You cannot promote jewish agendas and still be a National Socialist. You can lie and say that you are one. It doesn't make it the truth.

I'll be late for work if I keep this up. Continuing this later.


Anonymous 01/14/2020 (Tue) 16:23:44 Id: 7d1216 [Preview] No.78274 del
>>78272
>Files related.

Lol yeah, we should do it again.

>Not if you follow their own fucking ideals and immortalize Libertarianism.

Im not following their ideal, I am to libertarianism what national socialism was to socialism, never forget that a lot of "socialist" policies existed in natsoc germany, workers unions, which were the focal point of pro-jew propaganda film norma rae were mandates by germany at the time. they were not merely "socialist" policies, they were national socialist policies, just like mine are not merely libertarian policies. Did Hitler immortalize socialism just because of a few commonalities? fuck and no.

>The jews respecting non-jews after enslaving them? Are you that delusional?

Right now the jews beat us down and laugh at us if we do nothing, if we stand and fight, and fight well enough to royally fuck them over, yes, I could see them respecting us the same way a warrior respects a worthy opponent, or a sailor respects the tempermental sea. They probably won't respect us, because jews, but at least they will fear us once again. I've read Machiavelli, they will never love us, but fuck that shit, I want them afraid, fear is much superior to love in ensuring you aren't to be fucked with.

>No. Enforcing a Libertarian slavery regime where no natives to the nations are allowed in or invaders allowed out is retarded. Not perfect.

Why? we will increase the population of whites dramatically wile at the same time reducing the amount of other races by the same degree, increase the docility of those subhumans by outright massacring those whom we find most intolerable, and protect our population from the outside world while making them more self-sufficient. BTW, I do plan on expanding a one or few generation after the experiment succeeds.

>When I told you I've been on it since the 1990s, I didn't realize the message was the internet doesn't exist. Your attention span is seriously fucked up.

dial-up was a thing, the internet was just being born without the infrastructure to make it what it is today. Youtube was not owned by jewgle, myspace was a thing, napster was a controversy, everything was slow AF, and most people did not have a connection. No, the internet was not truly born until later on, at last not in the sense of how it exists today.


Anonymous 01/14/2020 (Tue) 16:36:57 Id: 7d1216 [Preview] No.78275 del
>>78271

>Yes. John Locke was the origin. He was known as the renegade jew against Britain. His promotion of "all religions" was simply to permit his religion of Judaism and he laid the building blocks of jewish control over Britain. Along with the jewish fathers of Libertarianism I showed you before, now you know for certain Libertarianism is a jewish agenda. I've been lenient with you so far due to your hatred of kikes while promoting kike ideals. I won't be after this. The red text about promoting jewish degeneracy (especially after that "allow CP" bullshit of yours) means you will either stop promoting jewish agendas or I'll continue banning you until you fuck off.

John Locke was not the origin of capitalism or what is now known as the NAP, I was not talking about writing, the first civs were people gathering around those who had the most food, the first police were those to whom food was given if the laws of the giver (the leader of the tribe that settled the area) were followed, cities were built around capitalistic commerce, as exchange became more convenient than simply raiding, roles became specialized, etc. and yes, the universal laws of civilizations such as these were "do not kill", "do not steal" - person and property. these were essential and are a primal moral sense ingrained in all of us that tells us tat if we are doing something to someone else's property or person without their consent, or against it, we are doing something wrong. John Locke doesn't figure into this at all, he was just a man with a pen, born far later, justifying rules gained from practical need and solutions, not words. for writing had not yet existed.

also, IDK about natural rights or "all religions", some religions are clearly better than others, and even a sane atheist such as I knows that I can live with christians or buddhist/shinto hybrids (on my trip to peaceful and friendly Saitama, Japan - you should visit), but not with judaics, muslims, or whatever fucked up religions came out of india and middle/southern america.

>No it's not. Human beings have possessed property since the beginning of time.

Ok, so you DO understand the points I am making here, but you have difficulty with reading comprehension. Strange.

>Stop promoting Marxist Communism, kid.

What? where did I promote marxism or communism? control over person and property is the very nature of ownership. seriously, what?


Anonymous 01/14/2020 (Tue) 16:37:15 Id: 7d1216 [Preview] No.78276 del
>>78271
>

I'm obviously not promoting an agenda that benefits the jews, how do you think jews benefit in a system where they are marked and unpersoned? where everything own is taken and everything they built is destroyed? where a shining beacon of truth causes the world to join in the empire that ultimately kills the jews and gives the world to their enemies?
where do they benefit? I don't see.

>
white is a race, I am of scottish and polish ancestry, scottish on part of my father, polish on part of my mother.
this is my ethnic heritage, and my inheritance, you confuse race for ethnicity, and white is the best way for us targeted by the jews to stand with a united identity, divided we fall.

my ideas are thought of by their usefulness to whites, if I'm stealing a play from the enemy team to use against them, so be it. what is important is to win.
I disregard the source, I did not chose them because I'm some sort of juedophile, if they were authored by non-jews I'd still be happy to take them.

>THERE IS NO REASON TO TOLERATE CHILD PORN. Whatsoever.

to tolerate less harmful degeneracy as a means to combat degeneracy far more harmful. Yeah, it's a min-max, why do you want the judeo-minded to give an "in" to controlling conversations? you have seen exactly how this creeping control occurs.
Besides, CP is going to just be like shock vids/images in the long-term, no one will see them except some depraved perverts who actually enjoy the naturally repulsive, and they will not do anything to let others know about it for the sake of their reputations.
the real ting to worry about in the long term is my removal of IP and how it affects innovation, I'd still say it's worth it.

>The whole point is to gain control. You're never going to be able to implement your "anti jew Libertarian Communism" without gaining control. Of course certain groups will justify legislation that favors them. That is why National Socialists justifying the truth, that jews need to be expelled from society, would be the best legislation.

if that is your strategy, you are welcome to try, we both go about saving the aryan peoples of the world in our own ways, I wish you good luck, and may god be with you.

>When the source of an ideal is jews, that alone justifies rejecting it. Socialism did not originate from jews. It originated from Mazdak the Zoroastrian. Of course when kikes are behind the source, the source deserves to be attacked. Stop deluding yourself into thinking otherwise.

we are dealing with the remains of generations who have had their minds altered thoroughly and unchangebly, if all jews disappeared tomorrow, the problems left in their wake would still exist and propagate themselves, this is how cults work when the dear leader dies. Worse, because jews are incompetent in many areas, the new boss might be a bit worse to deal with than the old one. (I'm betting on the rich pedo whites, the mudslimes, or the pet niggers taking the reigns )


Anonymous 01/14/2020 (Tue) 16:44:09 Id: 7d1216 [Preview] No.78277 del
>The jews are the main enemy. Without removing them from controlling nations, it is impossible to deal with their golem.

hey, and my system removes jews from control. whodathunk?

seriously though, my system is as libertarian as natsoc is socialist, they are both very clearly nationalistic first and foremost, and any similar seeming policies does not equate it with the controlled variants.

>The point is that the media advertises. That is how numbers of a movement are gained. While they will speak outrageous lies, more and more people will attend meetings. The NSDAP was banned an unbanned over and over again in Germany while the jewish press's constant deceits brought more members steadily to meetings until that party rose from 7 to millions. It's because people attended the meetings to see what the press was talking about, and were drawn in by the truth instead.

The role of gatekeepers like the "alt-" movements is to be the "more moderate opposition" for the disillusioned. It is these guys they go to, not us, we merely get a trickle of what they sieve up.

>"They're maligned by the media but they're successful but if you're maligned by the media you won't be successful" makes absolutely no sense.

It makes perfect sense given what you read above, they are the ones taking in numbers, we get much less because we are "too extreme" and everyone's favorite punching bag.

>No you can't. You cannot promote jewish agendas and still be a National Socialist. You can lie and say that you are one. It doesn't make it the truth.

where am I promoting jewish agendas, In what way does my system benefit the jews or harm white peoples? you've never said.


Anonymous 01/14/2020 (Tue) 20:30:16 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.78280 del
>>78274
>workers unions
>the focal point of pro-jew propaganda film norma rae
Trade unions were banned under the NSDAP. I have no idea which jewish propaganda you're following, but it's wrong.
>just like mine are not merely libertarian policies.
While your suggestions are extremely different from Libertarian retardism, there have been a few Libertarian/Marxist points you've made. Against property ownership primarily, but then supporting land ownership. Which is strange. I don't think you've come to a solid conclusion in your head yet. You're bouncing opposing ideas around everywhere.
>if we stand and fight, and fight well enough to royally fuck them over, yes, I could see them respecting us the same way a warrior respects a worthy opponent
You talk like the jew has honor and respect for those outside their tribe. This is complete bullshit. The jew is not a warrior. The jew has no honor.
>They probably won't respect us, because jews, but at least they will fear us once again.
And I hope to live long enough to see that day arrive.
>but fuck that shit, I want them afraid, fear is much superior to love in ensuring you aren't to be fucked with.
Correct. The kikes already believe their own propaganda from the many jews that shilled Buchenwald ridiculous claims into the lie of gas chambers. I would suggest designated men on the streets with intimidating presences to visit kikes at the top and frighten them. Mysterious figures with their faces covered. When initial intimidation doesn't work, increase the pressure with tactics meant to frighten them. It would be unwise and unlawful for me to explain this further.
>Why? we will increase the population of whites dramatically wile at the same time reducing the amount of other races by the same degree,
Are you even aware that slave owners fucked their own slaves? You shouldn't give this human peddling concept any more thought.
>increase the docility of those subhumans by outright massacring those whom we find most intolerable,
That was a jewish lie about the Einsatzgruppen. They didn't actually slaughter civilians. Communist partisans were the ones doing that.
>and protect our population from the outside world while making them more self-sufficient.
Any nation needs it's original inhabitants through ancestry, and vice-versa. As you should be aware, this lack of care about one's homeland results in complete disregard of the ancestors that came before and the habit of saying "the white race" label kikes pin on us instead of what race you actually are. All races should celebrate their own heritage and culture, not close off an entire nation to it's displaced descendants.
>BTW, I do plan on expanding a one or few generation after the experiment succeeds.
You sound young in many of your replies. I'm guessing you must be. You'll become disillusioned if you try to instill these ideals over the years. They won't pan out.
>dial-up was a thing, the internet was just being born without the infrastructure to make it what it is today
It did have infrastructure. Dial-up was annoying AF, and images took forever to load. That was the early 90s, kid. The late 90s, it was a bit faster.
>Youtube was not owned by jewgle, myspace was a thing, napster was a controversy, everything was slow AF, and most people did not have a connection. No, the internet was not truly born until later on, at last not in the sense of how it exists today.
Besides jewTube (kike Susan Wojcicki CEO), I'll go ahead and tell you how it exists today. Ben Silbermann owns Pinterest. Bob Rosenchein owns Answers.com. Anne Wojcicki has 23andMe. David Karp- Tumblr. Doug Leeds- Ask.com. Jan Koum- Whatsapp. Jason Citron- Discord. Jeff Bezos- Amazon. Jeff Weiner- Linkedin. John Stratton- Flickr/Verizon. Jonah Peretti- BuzzFeed. Joran Hoffner- Salon. Kevin Systrom - Instagram. Larry Page and Sergey Brin- Google. Mandy Ginsberg- MatchGroup and Tinder. Marc Randolph- Netflix. Mark Zuckerberg- Facebook (sure you knew that), Michael Hayward- Whisper. All of them are jews. And sites not owned by the internet follow kike censorship regardless.


Anonymous 01/14/2020 (Tue) 20:55:47 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.78281 del
>>78280
>and sites not owned by the internet
That was a fuck up. I meant sites not owned by jews.

>>78275
>John Locke was not the origin of capitalism
Capitalism? I was talking about the origin of Libertarianism.
>or what is now known as the NAP,
Network Access Protection? If you don't mean that, spell it out. I'm not even sure.
>the first civs were people gathering around those who had the most food,
Wrong. Everyone had to fend for their tribes through either hunting or gathering. It wasn't about lazy ass parasites taking from others.
>the first police were those to whom food was given if the laws of the giver (the leader of the tribe that settled the area) were followed,
The first police weren't in tribes. Tribes didn't need them. Trouble makers were dealt with by the community. The first police were prefects of ancient China, slaves of ancient Greece, the military of Rome, brotherhoods in Spain, courts which originated in Germany, and then officially officers of the crown in France.
>and yes, the universal laws of civilizations such as these were "do not kill", "do not steal" - person and property. these were essential and are a primal moral sense ingrained in all of us that tells us tat if we are doing something to someone else's property or person without their consent, or against it, we are doing something wrong.
>John Locke doesn't figure into this at all, he was just a man with a pen, born far later, justifying rules gained from practical need and solutions, not words. for writing had not yet existed.
I brought him up because as I said above, Liberalism originated from that kike. Liberalism which you said was alright to follow because you didn't care if it originated from jews. That was it.
>some religions are clearly better than others, and even a sane atheist such as I knows that I can live with christians or buddhist/shinto hybrid
>but not with judaics, muslims, or whatever fucked up religions came out of india and middle/southern america.
Agreed.
>Ok, so you DO understand the points I am making here, but you have difficulty with reading comprehension. Strange.
I have no difficulty with reading comprehension. I'm obviously displaying your points right above my responses for the intent that you understand what I'm replying to. I'm not making shit up here.
>What? where did I promote marxism or communism?
"the idea that one owns their persona and property and has exclusive control over what is done with either is one of the oldest ideas in human history, older than human civilization itself." + "abolishing all forms of intellectual property" + "with no recognition of property that is not physical in nature."<- You said all of this. That is Communism. The last statement is still partial Communism.
>control over person and property is the very nature of ownership. seriously, what?
The slavery you've been promoting is not Communism of course. Your ideas are all over the spectrum. You're schizo posting.
>>78276
>how do you think jews benefit in a system where they are marked and unpersoned? where everything own is taken and everything they built is destroyed?
>where a shining beacon of truth causes the world to join in the empire that ultimately kills the jews and gives the world to their enemies?
Ultimately killing the jews off is the perfect strategy. History has proven they're not expelled for their troublemaking forever. Expulsion is only temporary. Eradication needs to be the goal. It's after the destruction of this system, should you enslave instead of kill the cockroaches off that they benefit. Such a system that you wish to impose that creates slavery, locks in all citizens from returning to their homelands, and locks out all indigenous by ancestry.
>where do they benefit? I don't see.
I have already explained how that happened both after the fall of the Third Reich and what would happen in the future after enslavement of jews in other replies.


Anonymous 01/14/2020 (Tue) 21:17:24 Id: 7d1216 [Preview] No.78282 del
>>78280
T thought that unions were state run, private unions were banned, yes, because all workers were made to join a union controlled by the party, and they were given certain standards such as the five-day work week, and all who refused to work were punished.
-
I think you think I believe in some thing I do not and have never claimed to, I support ownership of private property very much, it fact, it serves as the foundation of the moral system which defines my society's domestic laws.

I am not against private property ownership, I am very, very much for it, where are you getting this from?

ownership is taking person and property, adding the medium of consent as a requirement to external interaction, and the freedom of anything to be done within those bounds, that is the NAP in a nutshell.

where have I ever claimed to be against private property? what the hell are you talking about? please please please link me a quote, because I cannot find it.

I'm honestly very confused, are we having difficulty of communication?
-
a good idea is a good idea, regardless of it's source, if it comes tangled with a bunch of bad ideas, simply untangle them and take the ones you think will work for you. it not their system, it's your own.

I am not consumed with nostalgia, trying to recreate what was a unique society in a unique time under unique circumstances.
I am not consumed with hatred for my enemy, I refuse to simply live in opposition to them.
I am consumed with love for my people, white people worldwide, of all ethnicities, european, north american, oceanian, and even middle eastern/north african and those white diaspora in other countries of the world (such as south africa), the love of my people isd the only guiding principle I hold, all else is disregarded, the policies I support are vetted only by my belief that they are what would be the best interest for my people to thrive and propagate.
-
"white" unifies us, yes, ethnicity is very important, and the wide diversity within our people is another treasure to be safeguarded, but we are all united, even if it is only by a common threat (it isn't the only unifying factor, there are much stronger ties, but even if there was nothing more than the opposition, it's enough). we survive and thrive, then we get back to individual identities.
-
The jew mocks honor, to them glory comes from living off of the host as you kill it like a parasite. Agreed, perhaps hoping for honor is too much, but I would take fear in it's place.
-
I highly doubt white master fucking niggers was a common practice, most white guys do no find negresses attractive. even if it were thew case, microchimerism does not affect the offspring of men, only women, if anything, the increasing proportion of white genetic material may help to tame whatever half-breed spawn these unions produce. but the unions won't happen, not very often, at least, white guys like white women, and some (mostly weebos, betas, and other degenerates) like azn chicks.
When is the last time you saw a negress you wanted to fuck? or an sandnigress? or a mestizo chica? or a jewess? or a curry bitch? or any non-white female? if you could choose between them or a white woman, would you ever choose to mix? most guys are into their own race, even those who pretend not to be. the white on anything else rape rate is roundable to 0%. think of how broad the term "rape" is in official terms right now.
-
I know, it's just another kike lie, weird you brought this up though, Never
said anything about Einsatzgruppen.
what is you first language? I think we are experiencing some breakdown in communication here.
-
I'm talking about the net here as a politically useful tool, a tool for discourse, a tool for action, 90's net wasn't at that point yet, both in infrastructure and culture.
-
Yes, I am aware that most of the internet and big tech is owned by kikes, has been for a while, this means nothing of relevance to what I was saying.


Anonymous 01/14/2020 (Tue) 21:23:53 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.78283 del
>white is a race, I am of scottish and polish ancestry, scottish on part of my father, polish on part of my mother.
I'm Scottish and displaced in America while Muslims overwhelm my homeland. I do not blame the Muslims, though I want them out. I blame who is responsible. American jews for the middle east 'America as a proxy' wars and nation infesting jews in Britain.
>this is my ethnic heritage, and my inheritance, you confuse race for ethnicity, and white is the best way for us targeted by the jews to stand with a united identity, divided we fall.
White is the label they slap on indigenous Europeans, and then hide under when they're Ashkenazis playing the 5th column. I've already showed you examples of the latter. Race is not a label. It is family lineage, common descent, your origins. Now, what annoys me about this is not only that many other white people (young) when I ask their race they say "white" and I say "no, your ethnicity", they reply with "I don't know". I'm also aware of a fact you really need to know. Kikes cannot stand against an entire race/ethnicity. Besides on Germans, they cannot project blame (which should be theirs to bare) on every single indigenous European ethnicity for situations such as the Trans Atlantic slave trade. They label us as "the white race" in order for their golems to blame us for false history. Not only negros but spics and other non-whites accuse us of historical slavery which was monopolized by jewish Marranos. If an entire ethnicity were to become Nationalist, it would be similar to the Third Reich and that's what scares kikes. So we're all lumped together as one race for that reason and also for the youth to forget who their ancestors were.
>i disregard the source, I did not chose them because I'm some sort of juedophile, if they were authored by non-jews I'd still be happy to take them.
Choose sources which are not jewish. Disregarding their evils while following ideas from jews is foolish.
>why do you want the judeo-minded to give an "in" to controlling conversations? you have seen exactly how this creeping control occurs.
I want them out. Dead and gone. With them gone, there should never be degeneracy left over. Not pedophilia, not homosexuality, not bestiality or trannyism. None of that shit. A purge of their wicked left overs is entirely necessary. You agreed with me on this about book burnings. Get your head in the game. Seek the destruction of degenerate practices.
>we are dealing with the remains of generations who have had their minds altered thoroughly and unchangebly,
Minds are not unchangeable. People can be convinced away from jewish influence so long as they don't head right back to it. My own mother is an example of this. I have woken her up over the phone a few times, only because I have no control over the woman and she's out of reach, she says on further calls that "Oprah said this" and "The View said that". She's getting up there in the years. Her mind is too easily influenced. I have the strong desire when I visit on holidays to smash her television.
>if all jews disappeared tomorrow, the problems left in their wake would still exist and propagate themselves, this is how cults work when the dear leader dies.
The NSDAP used book burnings to remove degeneracy. The Allied forces used denazification and the burning of National Socialist materials to remove purity and NSDAP influence. It all depends on who's in power.
>Worse, because jews are incompetent in many areas, the new boss might be a bit worse to deal with than the old one. (I'm betting on the rich pedo whites, the mudslimes, or the pet niggers taking the reigns )
Which is why along with the enemy, traitors must be purged and negros return to Africa from where they were taken by jews.
>>78277
>hey, and my system removes jews from control. whodathunk?
Hypothetically. There has been no real world application where your recently proposed system was put in place to remove kikes.


Anonymous 01/14/2020 (Tue) 21:29:23 Id: 7d1216 [Preview] No.78284 del
>>78281
-
Libertarianism of my kind is primarily capitalism as a basis of society, I don't figure anything Locke wrote into any of my formulations. Fuck John Locke.

I am my own man, with my own political vision, you cannot simply compare it to anything else, you must judge it on it's own practical merits.

you are stuck in this state of relating it to other things and validating it that way, it could be the best set of policies ever, with all the evidence in the world showing you how it works and that it gets you everything you ever wanted and more, and you'd never buy it because you got hung up on something some irrelevant kike said one time, and you think it sounds similar.
-
maybe we don't understand each other, in what way did i say private property must be gotten rid of?
-
maybe you are new, you seemed to be unaware that "merchant" was one of the many synonyms for "jew" around here.
-
ok, so "capitalism is old" which it is is communist? how? "abolish intellectual property" how is this not capitalist? do you know what Intellectual property means? it means copyright, patents, trademarks, trade secrets, etc. tools of kikes to control what I can do with my own property, to limit speech and take down videos they find "problematic", to protect themselves from criticism and make money off of sitting on their wrinkled asses and doing fuck all, holding creation and innovation hostage and getting fame and fortune of of the backs of stolen goods. IP is a violation of the NAP, and something that the jews have always been in favor of, it is a jewish invention. literally.
I think you lack any knowledge of what you speak on.
-
my ideas are of course all over the spectrum, I'm choosing based on what works best for white people in my country and then worldwide, not based on belonging to some group hugbox. If being in a cult is your main priority, get off of /pol/.
-


Anonymous 01/14/2020 (Tue) 21:43:39 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.78285 del
(56.20 KB 744x448 race.png)
I forgot the etymology about race from before. Pic related.
>>78277
>seriously though, my system is as libertarian as natsoc is socialist, they are both very clearly nationalistic first and foremost, and any similar seeming policies does not equate it with the controlled variants.
Reject everything jewish and stick with the Nationalism then. Your first goal should be to reject entirely jewish agendas, despite what some "YouTuber taught" you.
>The role of gatekeepers like the "alt-" movements is to be the "more moderate opposition" for the disillusioned. It is these guys they go to, not us, we merely get a trickle of what they sieve up.
Gatekeepers deserve the rope.
>they are the ones taking in numbers, we get much less because we are "too extreme" and everyone's favorite punching bag.
Many fanboys and girls leave such gatekeeping traitors when they find out. Molyneaux, LtCorbis/Soph, Peterson. Simply go into the comments section and reveal what pieces of shit they are. All you need to do to find fuel is search their names + exposed.
>where am I promoting jewish agendas,
I have said and have explained origins. You have admitted to promoting Libertarianism, and hand-waved that you do not care if the origin is jewish many times.
>In what way does my system benefit the jews or harm white peoples? you've never said.
I have said this as well. Regarding slavery. Regarding Liberalism. I'm not re-explaining. You're taking up a shit ton of time already. You've even responded to what I've said.
>>78282
>T thought that unions were state run, private unions were banned, yes, because all workers were made to join a union controlled by the party, and they were given certain standards such as the five-day work week, and all who refused to work were punished.
Because the jew despises work.
"Ladies and Gentlemen! Already here we see that the whole world lies between us; we could never conceive of work as a punishment – otherwise we would all have been convicts. We do not want to conceive of work as punishment. I must confess: I would not have been able to exist without work, and hundreds of thousands and millions would have been able to withstand perhaps 3 or 5 days, maybe even 10, but not 90 or 100 days without any activity. If Paradise really existed, the Land of Plenty, then our people would have been unhappy in it. We Germans seek constantly a possibility to do something and if we cannot find anything, at least from time to time we hit one another in the face. We are unable to bear absolute rest. Thus we see, already here, a big difference. Because a Jew has written this, true or not is unimportant because it still reflects the opinion which Jewry has about work. For them work is not an obvious ethical duty but at most a means to sustenance. In our eyes, this is not work because in this case any activity serving self-preservation, without regard to fellow men, might be called work. And we know that this work, in the past, consisted of plundering of caravans, and today in planned plundering of indebted farmers, industrialists and workers. The form has changed but the principle is the same. We do not call it work, but robbery. When already such a basic notion separates us, here comes another. I have already explained that in the long period in the North the races became purified. This means that all the inferior and weak gradually died out and only the soundest remained. Also, here the Jew differs from us because he has not become purified but instead practiced inbreeding; he multiplied greatly but only in narrow circles, and without selection. And therefore we see a generation which is plagued by defects caused by inbreeding. Finally, the Jew does not possess the third factor: The inner spiritual life. I do not need to explain here what a Jew generally looks like. You all know him. You know his constant restlessness that never gives him a possibility to concentrate and have a spiritual experience. In the most solemn moments he flickers his eyes and one can see that even during the most beautiful opera he is calculating dividends." (C)


Anonymous 01/14/2020 (Tue) 21:44:26 Id: 7d1216 [Preview] No.78286 del
>>78283
all whites are more closely related to each other than any of them is to an ashkenazi. FYI
We are all family, we are all of a common lineage, all whites share an common ancestor that they do not share with anyone of any other race.
White is real, just as real as any ethnicity within, you say the you and I are displaced, tat we are.
- of you do not know what the NAP stands for, despite me describing it here repeatedly, in detail, and telling you that I'm describing the NAP, maybe do some outside reading and find somewhere that can do a better job than me.
-
degeneracy will always be with us, even after the kikes leave, it's like murder, you can certainly reduce it, but as long as human beings are around, it will stay with you to some degree.

utopia is not a perfect society, it is the best possible society, the difference is important.

burn all books with bad ideas, some bad ideas remain, rid yourself of degenerates, some slip through your grasp and new ones are born, tis des not mean your actions were ineffective, just not perfectly effective.
There is no perfect solution to these things, only the best possible ones you can find.
-
"the only time when these useful idiots will change their minds is when it is to late for them" - yuri bezmenov on "useless idiots"
-
you will never be able to simply kill everyone causing you problems, even after the world is an ethnoglobe and other races literally don't exist anymore, thee will be whites among you who will turn against their kind, treason is a constant as much as any crime. Accept this, that said, if we go on a hunt, the prey will scatter, make them reliant upon you, as my system does, and you can control them much better, then when the populations are reduced, docile, and dependent upon us, we can eliminate them much easier with one swift strike.
-
we do not know if national socialist Germany was even the ideal society of Adolf Hitler, by his own admission he was constrained by factors outside his control.

NDSAP Germany fell because it was vulnerable to outside forces, I propose going turtle for that very reason, there is a reason why NK has lasted so long, and why Saokoku (closed) Japan was impenetrable from the outside, the Japanese had to open it up to the world from within.
-
how to take the negroes to africa? compensation or force?


Anonymous 01/14/2020 (Tue) 21:45:36 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.78287 del
>>78285
(Continued) "The Jew has never had his own art. His own temple has been built by foreign builders: The first was the Assyrians, and for the building of the second – the Roman artists. He has not left anything which might be called art, no buildings, nothing. In music, we know that he is only able to skillfully copy the others’ art. We shall not conceal that today he has many famous conductors whose fame he can thank the well-organized Jewish Press for. When a nation does not possess these three traits, it is not able to create states. And that is true because throughout centuries the Jew was always a nomad. He has never had what we might call a state. It’s a mistake which is spreading widely today to say that Jerusalem was a capital of a Jewish state of a Jewish nation. On the one side, there was always a great chasm between the tribes of Judah and Caleb and the northern Israeli tribes, and only David, for the first time, succeeded in gradually bridging the chasm through the unitary cult of Yahweh. We know precisely that this cult has at a very late time chosen for itself Jerusalem as its sole seat. Only from that moment have the Jewish people gotten a center, like Berlin or New York or Warsaw today. This was a town in which the Jew, thanks to his talents and traits, gradually achieved predominance, partly through the force of arms, partly through the “power of trombones.” Besides, the Jews, already in those times, lived as a parasite in the body of other peoples and it had to be so. Because a people which does not want to work – the often hard work of building and maintaining a state – to work in mines, factories, in construction etc.; all this was unpleasant to the Hebrew. Such a people will never establish a state but prefers to live in some other state where others work and he acts as an intermediary in business, a dealer in the best case, or in good German – a robber, a nomad who undertakes robbing raids just like in ancient times. And so we can now understand why the whole Zionist state and its establishing is nothing but a comedy. Herr Chief Rabbi has now said in Jerusalem: “Establishment of this state is not the most important; it is far from certain if it will at all be possible.” However, it is necessary that Jewry has this city as its spiritual headquarters because Jewry “materially and in fact are the masters of several states; we control them financially, economically and politically.” And so the Zionist state is going to be a harmless corn of sand in the eye. Efforts are made to explain that so and so many Jews have been found that want to go there as farmers, workers, even soldiers. If these people really have this urge in themselves, Germany today needs these ideal men as turf cutters and coal miners; they could take part in building our water power plants, our lakes etc. but it does not occur to them. The whole Zionist state will be nothing else than the perfect high school for their international criminals, and from there they will be directed. And every Jew will, of course, have immunity as a citizen of the Palestinian state and he will of course keep our citizenship. But when caught red-handed, he will not be a German Jew any longer but a citizen of Palestine. One can almost say that the Jew cannot help it because everything stems from his race. He cannot do anything about it and, besides, it doesn’t matter whether he is good or bad for he must act according to the laws of his race, just as do members of our people. A Jew is everywhere a Jew; consciously or unconsciously, he resolutely represents the interests of his race. Thus we can see the two great differences between races: Aryanism means ethical perception of work and that which we today so often hear – socialism, community spirit, common good before own good. Jewry means egoistic attitude to work and thereby mammonism and materialism, the opposite of socialism." (C)


Anonymous 01/14/2020 (Tue) 22:03:01 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.78288 del
>>78282
I'm not going to cover the same questions I have already addressed.
>I am not consumed with nostalgia, trying to recreate what was a unique society in a unique time under unique circumstances.
>I am not consumed with hatred for my enemy, I refuse to simply live in opposition to them.
I am. You should be. You claim to hate pedos and porn but do not hate jews? You're definitely in the wrong place.
>I am consumed with love for my people, white people worldwide, of all ethnicities, european, north american, oceanian, and even middle eastern/north african and those white diaspora in other countries of the world (such as south africa),
>the love of my people isd the only guiding principle I hold, all else is disregarded, the policies I support are vetted only by my belief that they are what would be the best interest for my people to thrive and propagate.
Hatred of jews which were responsible for white peoples' deaths, destruction and degeneracy of white nations, throughout history, needs to be your priority.
>"white" unifies us, yes, ethnicity is very important, and the wide diversity within our people is another treasure to be safeguarded, but we are all united, even if it is only by a common threat (it isn't the only unifying factor, there are much stronger ties, but even if there was nothing more than the opposition, it's enough).
>we survive and thrive, then we get back to individual identities.
You cannot survive without purging the jew. Not safekeeping them by enslaving. Not locking them in. They must be eradicated.
>if anything, the increasing proportion of white genetic material may help to tame whatever half-breed spawn these unions produce.
Disgusting. Mulattos aren't tame. They're fucking insane. There is literally a white and black person inside them fighting for dominance. I have witnessed this. It would be hilarious if they weren't such disgraceful abominations.
>but the unions won't happen, not very often, at least, white guys like white women, and some (mostly weebos, betas, and other degenerates) like azn chicks.
I have seen too many white men with nigresses and white women with niggers. The mass media plays down white men, often insulting, and promotes racial interbreeding as they play up the negro male. You know this. I want that line of thinking reprogrammed from their original jewish programming.
>When is the last time you saw a negress you wanted to fuck? or an sandnigress? or a mestizo chica? or a jewess? or a curry bitch? or any non-white female?
Never. But I'm not like the degenerates I have seen many times that throw away their ancestry for interracial breeding.
>if you could choose between them or a white woman, would you ever choose to mix? most guys are into their own race, even those who pretend not to be. the white on anything else rape rate is roundable to 0%. think of how broad the term "rape" is in official terms right now.
You sound far too much like you're dismissing the fact that interracial breeding happens because the idea offends you. Use that. Stop people from doing it.
>I know, it's just another kike lie, weird you brought this up though, Never said anything about Einsatzgruppen.
I brought them up for a reason. Mass murder's what they were accused of during and after the defeat of Germany. These subjects tend to be brought up on this board.
>what is you first language? I think we are experiencing some breakdown in communication here.
English. Don't talk shit about my use of it. My grammar has been far better than yours. I haven't resorted to pointing out your spelling fuck-ups because that's not the subject.
>I'm talking about the net here as a politically useful tool, a tool for discourse, a tool for action, 90's net wasn't at that point yet, both in infrastructure and culture.
It was unmoderated and a festering pile of shit because of that. This is why I brought it up.
>Yes, I am aware that most of the internet and big tech is owned by kikes, has been for a while, this means nothing of relevance to what I was saying.
Of course it does. You brought up modern net.


Anonymous Board owner 01/14/2020 (Tue) 22:20:39 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.78289 del
(685.14 KB 1899x1615 3 (3).jpg)
>>78284
>Libertarianism of my kind is primarily capitalism as a basis of society, I don't figure anything Locke wrote into any of my formulations. Fuck John Locke.
"Libertarianism of my kind". There you go again. Locke wasn't the only Libertarian. Here are the others yet again. Others which Libertarian views you need to avoid taking on.
>I am my own man, with my own political vision, you cannot simply compare it to anything else, you must judge it on it's own practical merits.
Not if you follow Libertarianism, you're not your own man with your own political vision. You're taking what you've learned, but flat out refusing to reject that which is jewish.
>it could be the best set of policies ever, with all the evidence in the world showing you how it works and that it gets you everything you ever wanted and more, and you'd never buy it because you got hung up on something some irrelevant kike said one time, and you think it sounds similar.
I have pointed out what was wrong with your policies many times through so many goddamn replies. You were insecure about your own propositioning of said policies because you both said to ban you for it and that it was "from Satan". Yet when it's challenged you throw this kind of temper tantrum.
>maybe we don't understand each other, in what way did i say private property must be gotten rid of?
Private intellectual property. The jews are not creative. They buy off intellectual property. The better policy would be to protect intellectual property and completely restrict profit off of an inventor or creator.
>maybe you are new, you seemed to be unaware that "merchant" was one of the many synonyms for "jew" around here.
There are merchants that are not jews. I have worked for small business white men and women.
>ok, so "capitalism is old" which it is is communist? how? "abolish intellectual property" how is this not capitalist?
Capitalism isn't about abolishing intellectual property. It literally means that trade and industry are privately owned instead of by the state. When the state regulated property, that is the opposite of Capitalism.
>do you know what Intellectual property means? it means copyright, patents, trademarks, trade secrets, etc.
>tools of kikes to control what I can do with my own property, to limit speech and take down videos they find "problematic", to protect themselves from criticism and make money off of sitting on their wrinkled asses and doing fuck all, holding creation and innovation hostage
Because they stole those tools with money. They bought off the IPs they did not create from long dead inventors and creators.
>IP is a violation of the NAP, and something that the jews have always been in favor of, it is a jewish invention. literally.
Oh look at this. "I don't care what jews came up with use whatever works!" followed up by "it is a jewish invention" as your basis for being against IP. The greatest part about that foolishness is that you're wrong. Patent laws and copyrights were established by British royalty
>I think you lack any knowledge of what you speak on.
And I think you're resorting to being an ass now because you're flustered. I have proven my knowledge of multiple subjects in every reply.
>my ideas are of course all over the spectrum, I'm choosing based on what works best for white people in my country and then worldwide,
Which I explained multiple times why your ideas would not work.
>not based on belonging to some group hugbox. If being in a cult is your main priority, get off of /pol/.
Is a National Socialist board a group hugbox and National Socialism a cult, according to you? I have news for you. This is my board.


Anonymous 01/14/2020 (Tue) 22:38:06 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.78290 del
Don't tell me to get off. Stick with the facts at hand, not telling me to leave /pol/. I can easily make you leave, but I haven't banned you yet purely from your awareness of international jewry. That doesn't mean I won't if you get out of hand.

>>78286
>all whites are more closely related to each other than any of them is to an ashkenazi. FYI We are all family, we are all of a common lineage, all whites share an common ancestor that they do not share with anyone of any other race.
I am aware of this. See my post here: >>>/news/15597
>White is real, just as real as any ethnicity within, you say the you and I are displaced, tat we are.
White is a color. Your home land is what your race stems from. That is why I provided the image with the etymology of the word race.
>of you do not know what the NAP stands for, despite me describing it here repeatedly, in detail, and telling you that I'm describing the NAP, maybe do some outside reading and find somewhere that can do a better job than me.
There are multiple types of acronyms which can be NAP. That's why you need to type it out at least once. There's the Non-Aggression Principle. That doesn't sound like what you're into. So then Network Access Protection seems closer. Couldn't be Network Access Point or the National Academy Press.
>degeneracy will always be with us, even after the kikes leave, it's like murder, you can certainly reduce it, but as long as human beings are around, it will stay with you to some degree.
Still needs to be purged and regulated against, not given free reign to escalate.
>utopia is not a perfect society, it is the best possible society, the difference is important.
The best possible society was citizenship under the Third Reich. Hands down.
>burn all books with bad ideas, some bad ideas remain, rid yourself of degenerates, some slip through your grasp and new ones are born, tis des not mean your actions were ineffective, just not perfectly effective.
Of course, but eliminating everything linked to it possible is a step in the right direction.
>There is no perfect solution to these things, only the best possible ones you can find.
And I know what the perfect solution is. National Socialism, which needs to rise once more. This time worldwide.
>"the only time when these useful idiots will change their minds is when it is to late for them" - yuri bezmenov on "useless idiots"
Are you lumping this assumption on me? That would be rich, considering how you have been refusing to change your mind.
>you will never be able to simply kill everyone causing you problems, even after the world is an ethnoglobe and other races literally don't exist anymore,
The majority of the problems would be gone.
>thee will be whites among you who will turn against their kind, treason is a constant as much as any crime. Accept this,
And those will be few, because traitors will be executed and there would be no more jews to sew discord + division.
>that said, if we go on a hunt, the prey will scatter, make them reliant upon you, as my system does, and you can control them much better, then when the populations are reduced, docile, and dependent upon us, we can eliminate them much easier with one swift strike.
The Arbeit Macht Frei camps were a bad idea. It's best if the prey flees. Also better if they're not permitted to escape. This is why a nation needs heavily militarized forts across all borders. No checkpoints. After all are returned, no way in or out. No immigration.
>we do not know if national socialist Germany was even the ideal society of Adolf Hitler, by his own admission he was constrained by factors outside his control.
He was constrained by his generals disobeying his orders and strategies.
>NDSAP Germany fell because it was vulnerable to outside forces, I propose going turtle for that very reason, there is a reason why NK has lasted so long, and why Saokoku (closed) Japan was impenetrable from the outside, the Japanese had to open it up to the world from within.
Also because it did not take worldwide. International jewry organized against w/the kosher nostra.


Anonymous 01/14/2020 (Tue) 22:41:28 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.78291 del
>>78286
Ran into the character limit of 4096.
>how to take the negroes to africa? compensation or force?
By urgency, truth propaganda and then those that remain, force. They should want to return to Africa if a paradise awaits them. National Socialism with an African puppet leader needs to be in their nation as well as all others but Israel. Israel already has their nationalist ethnocentric none but jews are permitted rights racial state. So no rights for immigrants whatsoever. Again, worldwide. All will want to return to their homelands to regain rights, which should be highly encouraged.

Also, I got ahead of myself here >>78287 when there were more replies to deal with. That was a small segment of Hitler's speech to the National Socialist German Workers Party public meeting in the Great Hall of the Hofbrauhaus on Friday the 15th, August 1920. If you're new here, this username I had to choose to become Vol of this board in 2016 is both an homage to Hitler and a calculated method to bring out the Hitler hating jews (which has worked quite well), not a role-play.
Edited last time by AdolfHitler on 01/14/2020 (Tue) 22:57:58.


Anonymous 01/15/2020 (Wed) 02:11:20 Id: 7d1216 [Preview] No.78293 del
race is common origin, if it was merely homeland the civnats would have a point when they say every nigger born in murica is equal to a white man born in the same place. Blood, not soil.
-
I said that if you wanted to belong to a cult to get off this site, and your response is that I think this site is a cult? I claim national socialism is more open than you think it is, and you think I imply that natsoc is a cult?
This is why I questioned if english was your first language.
-
The non-aggression principle is exactly what I was referring to when I used the acronym NAP, it is an ancient principle serving as the foundation of all law, since before the dawn of man, it has merely been labelled and marketed by those who pretend it was an original idea of theirs.
A system of person and property, of ownership and consent, and complete freedom so long as they remain within those bounds.
the difference between rape and sex is consent to one's physical interaction with another's physical person, the difference between theft and gifting is consent to one's physical interaction with another's physical property.
Contracts and Oaths and other legally binding agreements are outlines of the terms on which consent can be given or relinquished.
Intellectual Property is rejected because it interferes with this, by allowing the ownership of non-physical property, ideas and the like, you interfere with the system outlined above, ownership of IP necessarily overrides other's ownership of physical real, and tangible forms of property.
-
degeneracy does not spread on it's own, when talking about degeneracy we are describing behaviours that are by nature maladaptive and self-destructive, they can only survive with external support, support which will be cut in it's entirety under my system, for the same reason that subhumans will not grow in number, but shrink as more productive peoples thrive once the one is not required to support the other in a parasitic relationship. Degenerates harm themselves with their actions, and die out quick once we are not required to sustain them and pay for the consequences of their behaviors, without our support, without our forced "tolerance", they die to their own vices. the self-sustainable fit will rise to replace the unfit and the sickly, the independent replaces the dependent, the good replaces the evil precisely because evil is self-destructive, but only when the host is not forced to be the prey of the parasite.


Anonymous 01/15/2020 (Wed) 02:21:06 Id: 7d1216 [Preview] No.78294 del
to me, a cult is primarily defined by three things, and this is how I know we live in a meta-cult:
1. sacred cows: that which is required to be loved and seen as perfectly good.
2. taboos: that which is required to be hated and seen as absolutely evil.
3. scapegoats: something that is used as a proxy upon which the failings of 1 and the positives of 2 are heaped, used to maintain the status quo.
each can be people, groups, ideas, etc. the enemy within to maintain unity and discourage dissent.
This board is not a cult.
-
so long as my views are unique, they are my own. everyone will share some ideas which others, even those whom they ideologically oppose, my ideas mostly come from my own thought, not reading the writings of others, I do not quote the people you've posted, the only thing I borrowed were titles to ideas I came up with on my own, when I typed out my ideas for the foundation of law, people said "you mean the NAP", when I typed out my political ideology, they said "you mean the NWS model of minarchism", my ideas are from the mind of a gentile. Never read much Locke, Mises, or Rand, most is some quotes in some pictures. Everything I write originated in my brain, not theirs, and my heart has always been to my people and for the good of the human race as a whole ("jews in space" is never happening, even if they win, if the stars are to be claimed by humanity, it will be us and only us who claims them). It is my love of my volk that compels me, and so anything I write is national socialism, that is the core of Hitler's speeches to me, not a mere list of policies, but the love which motivated each of them. His love and heroism, even in face of great adversity, that is what I most identified with, in this sense at least I am national socialist.
-
I agree with a lot of what you wrote, and I think we share common goals, if a fight starts, I'd be at your side, despite all differences. that is how I'd like to end this, I am your brother, and I want whats best for what I care for, I care for truth, for my people, for the future, and all that goes with them. Maybe I am wrong about what is best for them, but I know my intent is pure. If your way is better, I will want it to win out over mine.
Besides, if either of our ideas are winning, I will support them, anything is better than what we have going now, and what threatens to come in the future (I'm talking on the other side which we both oppose).
-
I do not hate you, please do not hate me, lets us leave this conversation as brothers.
-
my sentences aren't good, I know.
I use commas to much and periods too little.
perhaps I fail at use of parenthesis as well.
I'm no writer, no thinker, I'm just a guy with an opinion.
my issues in spelling are due to typos and phoneposts.
my grammar may have issues, admittedly, I'm not very good at writing complex sentences, but hopefully it's enough to get the meaning across, the problem is me feeling misunderstood, and wondering if I'm having issues conveying my thoughts to you properly.
-
maybe I am misunderstanding you too?


Anonymous 01/15/2020 (Wed) 03:17:08 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.78295 del
>>78293
>race is common origin,
Oh, I know it is. That's why I referenced you to >>>/news/15597
>if it was merely homeland the civnats would have a point when they say every nigger born in murica is equal to a white man born in the same place.
No they wouldn't. America is not the homeland of the negro. It never has been. Back to civnats though. You really shouldn't fault me for despising Liberalism. They are Liberals. It is those faggots that call for "all inclusive nationalism" + "freedom, tolerance, equality, and individual rights".
>Blood, not soil.
The saying is blood and soil. Both are important. Everyone has an instinctual drive to return to their homeland. Some just had it squashed down by brainwashing.
>I said that if you wanted to belong to a cult to get off this site, and your response is that I think this site is a cult? I claim national socialism is more open than you think it is, and you think I imply that natsoc is a cult?
What other group would I desire to belong to if not for the very National Socialism I have been promoting here? I didn't see mention of a type of cult.
>This is why I questioned if english was your first language.
I responded in the way I did because you are not getting your points across with English. Your accusation of me wanting to join a cult was vague. Thus I had to insert what you possibly meant. Plus if you got really uppity about my English, I could simply reference every post where you've misspelled words. That would be autistic as fuck though.
>The non-aggression principle is exactly what I was referring to when I used the acronym NAP,
I get it now. Wasn't sure which acronym before, as Network Access Protection might've covered your proposed regulations of the internet. So the non-aggression principle alsio originating from jew John Locke and continued through jewess Ayn Rand and jew Murray Rothbard. But of course, you don't care what originates from jews you'll take it anyway.
>it is an ancient principle serving as the foundation of all law, since before the dawn of man, it has merely been labelled and marketed by those who pretend it was an original idea of theirs.
You realize the non-aggression principle is against initiating force, right? Slavery would be impossible with no aggression.
>A system of person and property, of ownership and consent, and complete freedom so long as they remain within those bounds.
I'm aware by now that you don't care whether a jew is for something or not. Doesn't matter. I'm still going to bring up one of those fathers of Libertarianism. Again, the kike Murray Rothbard. He was all for this non-aggression principle. He was against the state forcing parents to care for their children, against children even having to be raised by their parents if they don't want to be, and even proposed a free market for children. For people freely being able to buy and sell kids as merchandise. He also proposed that it was okay to starve your child so long as you don't prevent them from obtaining food on their own. This was a typically deeply fucked up jew. And when vigorously applied in all matters, there is what's wrong with the non-aggression principle. Here's some other applications. Taxation of wealthy kikes, aggressive. Penalizing crimes such as fraud, murder, molestation; punishing these acts is "aggressive".
>the difference between rape and sex is consent to one's physical interaction with another's physical person, the difference between theft and gifting is consent to one's physical interaction with another's physical property.
And the penalty of theft or rape would be aggressive. I hope you're seeing the problem with this Liberal NAP ideal.
>Contracts and Oaths and other legally binding agreements are outlines of the terms on which consent can be given or relinquished.
Contracts allow organizations and corporations to circumvent the law and force the desperate to sign over their rights. And yes, despite what loxist jew Bernie Sanders says, poor white people exist.


Anonymous 01/15/2020 (Wed) 03:46:45 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.78296 del
>>78294
>Intellectual Property is rejected because it interferes with this, by allowing the ownership of non-physical property, ideas and the like, you interfere with the system outlined above,
Those whom create the intellectual property should own it until they die. Those whom buy it off should not be allowed to do so. That is still theft, despite the purchase.
>ownership of IP necessarily overrides other's ownership of physical real, and tangible forms of property.
Enforced laws override others' ownership of real forms of property. Laws which should also not exist.
>>78294
>to me, a cult is primarily defined by three things, and this is how I know we live in a meta-cult:
>1. sacred cows: that which is required to be loved and seen as perfectly good.
Hitler is sacred. He should never be insulted, for that is the way of the jew. The primary magnet which outs them the best. To admit that he was human and that humans make mistakes is fine. To say, as one brainwashed anon put it, that "he had fucked opinions" is jewish bullshit.
>2. taboos: that which is required to be hated and seen as absolutely evil.
Kikes and their many degenerate alien agendas which they push on our societies. (I'm not meaning alien as in space traveling ETs)
>3. scapegoats: something that is used as a proxy upon which the failings of 1 and the positives of 2 are heaped, used to maintain the status quo.
The jews are not scapegoats here. They're blamed for what they actually do.
>each can be people, groups, ideas, etc. the enemy within to maintain unity and discourage dissent.
Again, we all know who the enemy within are.
>This board is not a cult.
I agree. So then what cult was I supposed to want to belong to?
>so long as my views are unique, they are my own. everyone will share some ideas which others, even those whom they ideologically oppose, my ideas mostly come from my own thought, not reading the writings of others,
You obtained the Liberal viewpoint of freedom of speech (you proposed for the internet), not from your own mind but from Liberalism. You have even said it was your form of Liberalism. That ideal is not your own as much as National Socialism is not mine to claim as my own idea. This is due to the life you have led and the indoctrination we have all received. The issue is to reject that indoctrination. Moving on.
>people said "you mean the NAP", when I typed out my political ideology, they said "you mean the NWS model of minarchism", my ideas are from the mind of a gentile.
Many non-jews follow Liberalism. They're useful golems as much as non-whites. That is why I told you to read the Protocols in the .pdf I linked far above. I was not aware of Locke, Rothbard and Rand behind their origins for Liberalism. I hated it first after seeing John Stewart on television, then more after reading the Protocols of Zion, and even more after finding out those other kikes started it.
>("jews in space" is never happening, even if they win, if the stars are to be claimed by humanity, it will be us and only us who claims them)
Even if it does, they'd be like the Ferengi and despised by any possible intelligent alien species out there. Maybe this hypothetical species would realize our historical mistakes and vaporize the pieces of shit. But that is an unknown situation.
>It is my love of my volk that compels me, and so anything I write is national socialism, that is the core of Hitler's speeches to me, not a mere list of policies, but the love which motivated each of them. His love and heroism, even in face of great adversity, that is what I most identified with, in this sense at least I am national socialist.
Then follow his speeches and true National Socialism, not Liberalism and slavery. I'll include a collection in this post which also has some random historical facts.
>I agree with a lot of what you wrote, and I think we share common goals etc. (running out of character limit to reference the whole thing)
Then you have honor, which is embedded in every indigenous European. You may eventually see all of the light and oppose the dark.


Anonymous 01/15/2020 (Wed) 04:06:55 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.78297 del
(3.90 MB 426x240 jewds.gif)
>>78295
>Besides, if either of our ideas are winning, I will support them, anything is better than what we have going now, and what threatens to come in the future (I'm talking on the other side which we both oppose).
Agreed. Despite my hatred of Liberalism, if your way (should you continue to promote it) actually rose to power (aggression again, see how I'm trying to teach you there are acceptable forms?) then I would undoubtedly leave this ZOG hellscape and join. If simply only to obtain jew slaves under new law and execute the treasonous mother fuckers. Something I don't engage in now simply to avoid life in prison.
>I do not hate you, please do not hate me, lets us leave this conversation as brothers.
I don't hate you either. My replies are salty to a degree, always. I tried to keep that out of conversations with our former BO and probably failed, despite the fact I respect him. I've lived for too long on this Zionist shithole planet not to be a disgruntled old man.
>my sentences aren't good, I know. I use commas to much and periods too little. perhaps I fail at use of parenthesis as well. I'm no writer, no thinker, I'm just a guy with an opinion.
I don't even care about all of that. It's fine.
>my issues in spelling are due to typos and phoneposts.
Now these situations are what make your English somewhat unintelligible, but again, doesn't matter. I can read it. My English doesn't have issues. I have only once been graded poorly on grammar, and that was on comas a kike professor used to fail my written portion essays as I passed multiple choice exams 100%. I would so much enjoy, under a new law permitting, watching that bitch hang at the end of a rope. Also, she spent the entire fucking World History course shitting on Christianity instead of teaching it.
>the problem is me feeling misunderstood, and wondering if I'm having issues conveying my thoughts to you properly.
When I said schizo posting, it's because your proposed ideas are jumbled. Some contrary to others. What you should do is sit and write down these concepts, think hard on them, scratching out what is unnecessary. The best option is that which already exists. Hitler's speeches cover much and so do the 25 points of National Socialism.


Anonymous 03/24/2020 (Tue) 19:27:53 Id: 7d1216 [Preview] No.79059 del
Men should not have sex unless it is for reproductive purposes, and im the context of heterosexual marriage.
Men should not engage themselves in any sexual activities that could not directly result in the creation of their offspring.
Men must never couple with a woman who is not completely finished her physical and neurological development.
Men must never couple with a woman who is not a virgin of the same race as themselves.
Men must never couple with more than one woman in the course of their lives.
Men must never masturbate or consume pornography.
Men must never associate sex with love or fun or pleasure, only with reproduction.
You must refuse sex to all, including your partner and yourself, in all circumstances besides the immediate production of offspring.

A weak woman may cheat on you or threaten to leave you if you follow this code, weak women often associate sexual activity with a healthy relationship, no matter how you may more than make up for this in other areas, leave her if you must, but do not allow her to cause you to stray from this path of abstinence.

Ideally, teach your partner to follow your example, to accept that an abstinent marriage is not one lacking in love or happiness, but one that is overflowing with these things, expressed in other, more pure, ways.

G-rated acts of love and devotion carry far more weight than those carnal acts of lust.

Dissuade her fears, assure her that it is not that she is so ugly that you do not desire her, but that she is so beautiful that you cannot needlessly defile her.
She must not listen to those who say you are being abusive by denying her her needs, but must instead believe that you are being benevolent by freeing her from her unhealthy desires.
Love within a relationship, even a married one, must be disentangled from sex, only then can both husband and wife ascend to a higher level of consciousness and resist the poisonous influences of modern society.

I believe it was Pythagoras who once said, "no man ever gained anything from having sex with a woman but his children". this was from the perspective of what can be gained through celibacy (Hindu Brahmacharya, Christian Abstinence, etc). The Spartans also understood this; it was considered shameful for a spartan to be seen entering or leaving his wife's bedchamber, according to Xenophon.

The spartans, however, treated procreation as an important duty to their people and therefore had children rather than trying to all be a bunch of celibates - they would have been more powerful through lifetime celibacy but what's the point in that if you have no future generation to pass things down to?

TL;DR sex is for children, not love, and not pleasure.
If your onset of abstinence within your marriage ultimately destroys it, the marriage was not worth preserving in the first place.


Anonymous 03/25/2020 (Wed) 05:02:29 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.79067 del
>>79059
Oh look. The "National Socialism is not marketable but Libertarianism is" anon came back to tell us to stop having sex with our wives unless it's for making babies. The Spartans and Pythagoras said it too. We better do what he says.


Anonymous 03/25/2020 (Wed) 11:49:57 Id: 7d1216 [Preview] No.79071 del
>>79067
You just want to replicate the Germany of the 30's and 40's, to me, political policy is not of importance, what is of importance is the white race and it's future, policy is just a tool to achieve this end.

If i lived in those times, I would have wholeheartedly supported Hitler and his approach, it was the best cause in that time, better than mine would have been.

Those times are long past, things have changed. the circumstances of that period may return, and full-on National socialism may become a practical possibility, I've never said my policies are the end-all be-all, they may probably be a stepping stone on the path towards a replica of the Reich, but we must live in our time and deal with the hands we were given, forcing things is never a good option, especially when you lack the power to back it up (we need numbers, public influence and presence, and the other things the NSDAP had before taking power, that we simply do not have).

My policies are not in contradiction of each other; your cited example of intellectual property and physical property rights were two concepts that were actually in contradiction with one another (someone works hard with their own property to make something to sell, but loses the right to do so when a company says it looks like something they made with their property with intent to sell, either the artist may not do as he wishes with his property, or the immaterial concept of a likeness is more of a property than the physical objects being combined, altered, and sold), so I took a side in the conflict.

>stop having sex with our wives unless it's for making babies

that is what sex is actually for, and it's not just abstaining from non-procreative sex, it's also refusing non-procreative sex acts as well, handjobs, blowjobs, buttfucking, etc. are for faggots, faggots do that kind of shit.

Penis-in-vagina is the only thing that makes babies, so it is the only thing acceptable.

besides, we need to renew the concept of chaste and platonic love between lovers, a loving relationship between husband and wife that cannot exist without carnality should never have existed at all.

what exactly is wrong with any of this?


Anonymous 03/25/2020 (Wed) 12:43:33 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.79075 del
>>79071
Your post that used to be above this one was full of lies, like claiming Libertarian popularity means it should continue to be marketed, claiming Hitler adopted jewish ideals (he didn't, Socialism existed before kikes), claiming his Generals losing the war was his fault, etc. It doesn't matter that you followed it up with Hitler praising false flattery. The insults will not stand. You haven't been around for a little while. I already declared I would delete such subversive bullshit against Hitler and National Socialism. You don't need to see that message which was likely drowned out by further posts in the Meta thread. It's at the top of the page. Insulting National Socialism or Hitler, or promoting jewish degeneracy, will result in an immediate ban. I've given your ban a day. Do not do that again.

Now then.

>that is what sex is actually for, and it's not just abstaining from non-procreative sex,
Yes. Sex is for making babies. Nobody's contesting that. It's also a normal recreational activity within marriages. It is not normal to have sex with multiple partners outside of marriage. That is degenerate.
>it's also refusing non-procreative sex acts as well, handjobs, blowjobs, buttfucking, etc. are for faggots, faggots do that kind of shit.
Women can't be faggots, anon. Women can't give other women handjobs, blowjobs, or buttfuck them. That's known as fingering, cunnilingus, and the stupid penis hating dykes have to use penis shaped toys to buttfuck each other. Anyway, I happen to agree with you only about buttfucking. The asshole is a one way highway. I'm not about poop noodle, that is what you get when you fuck an ass that has shit in it so shit is coming out of your dick. Yes. It's as disgusting as it sounds and degenerate.
>Penis-in-vagina is the only thing that makes babies, so it is the only thing acceptable.
Foreplay is required to get that vagina working. There's a woman attached. You need to get the woman started. Otherwise, even in marriages, they're just going to cry rape.
>besides, we need to renew the concept of chaste and platonic love between lovers,
>a loving relationship between husband and wife that cannot exist without carnality should never have existed at all.
There's no need for "chaste and a platonic relationship" within a marriage.
>what exactly is wrong with any of this?
There's nothing wrong with sex with your wife. You claim that if the woman leaves you for not having sex with her, she's weak. Newsflash: Women are biologically weak, mentally and physically. Their emotions even determine their mental state. They are not logical beings. If you stop having sex with your wife, you're not allowed to be upset she went and got the dicking she was used to from someone else. If SHE stops having sex with you and then cheats, that's another story entirely.


sage sage 03/26/2020 (Thu) 00:09:04 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.79079 del
>>79071
Your appeal asked "how?" but you know damn well how, like I told you before. Claiming Libertarian popularity means it should continue to be marketed, claiming Hitler adopted jewish ideals and claiming his Generals losing the war was his fault. You know you did this. Don't pretend you didn't. The ban has been lifted. Do not even go there again. I've been sick and tired of that kind of lying shit for a long time.
Edited last time by AdolfHitler on 03/26/2020 (Thu) 00:10:01.


Anonymous 04/08/2020 (Wed) 18:40:22 [Preview] No.79228 del
Bring back segregation of the sexes and chaperones, repeal the vote for women.


Anonymous 04/08/2020 (Wed) 18:59:43 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.79232 del
>>79228
"Another" Tor anon types this shit after the fag pedophile crying in the Meta thread. 04/08/2020 (Wed) 18:33:30 = crying faggot. 04/08/2020 (Wed) 18:40:22 = you. Same person. Segregating sexes so there's no reproducing with women of our own race? Pretending votes matter? Typical MGTOW. Not hard to figure this shit out, gay pedo.


Anonymous 04/09/2020 (Thu) 06:35:31 [Preview] No.79247 del
>>79232

How retarded are you? Do you think I meant segregate the sexes forever so that the entire race will die out? You abject mongoloid?

Segregate them in schools, don't let women out without a chaperone, have marriages arranged between fathers rather than letting her loose to breed with the first rogue to give her a wink and a nod.

Lay off the benzos or whatever mind altering drugs you're on, they've twisted your mind.


Anonymous 04/09/2020 (Thu) 08:13:04 [Preview] No.79249 del
Seriously I hate Americans, everyone on earth hates Americans. Thank god you retards are going to go extinct. ~70 years of having misinformation shoved down your throats on TV and in schools/universities has really lowered your IQs beyond recovery levels. Oh and let's not forget how you've been poisoned with BPA in canned food and all the other crap you guys eat with wild abandon.

Coupled with the autism caused by neonatal circumcision, the world would be better off without you unthinking swine polluting it. And I say this as an American (but I wasn't mutilated by my parents).

Fuck you all for giving everything our ancestors fought for away.


Anonymous 04/09/2020 (Thu) 13:08:39 Id: 236a7d [Preview] No.79251 del
(162.85 KB 480x491 435.jpg)
>>79247
That's what you said, pedophile who jerks off and blows boys, you fucking degenerate."Bring back segregation of the sexes". You're not about promoting breeding with women of the same race. You're about diddling little boys. Types like you have zero interest in women. I don't take drugs.
>>79249
I know you hate Americans. You're the anti-American spammer. Our other regular identified you, TORpedo.
>Thank god you retards are going to go extinct
>is American
Now that's hilarious.
>(but I wasn't mutilated by my parents)
Neither was I. I'm descended from Scots. Though because I wouldn't let your thread about diddling kids, you tried to false flag me as a kike. You're new here. I've been banning jews and jew agendas like what you promoted since 2017. Imagine coming to a board for National Socialists and then crying because your pedophile thread isn't allowed. Absolute madness.
Edited last time by AdolfHitler on 04/09/2020 (Thu) 13:11:22.


Anonymous 04/12/2020 (Sun) 08:56:36 Id: f6ed63 [Preview] No.79299 del
(1.63 MB 2048x1905 onlyfanscovid19.png)


sage sage 04/13/2020 (Mon) 15:58:06 Id: 452b99 [Preview] No.79307 del
>>79299
What am I supposed to do with this non context post again? I have a feeling that this the ""usual"" suspect spamming this board again


Anonymous 05/20/2020 (Wed) 05:07:18 [Preview] No.79957 del
Israel was playing porn on Palestinian Television. Using the porn as a weapon.
https://rense.com/general21/israelissaidrunningporn.htm
https://muslimskeptic.com/2019/01/10/pornography-israel-weapon-of-war/
you know how many porn stars are Israeli? If you watch prons you may inadvertently be wacking off to a jew.


Anonymous 05/20/2020 (Wed) 14:32:46 Id: d368b5 [Preview] No.79964 del
>>79307
I'm not the same Anon but I'll give context. Only fans is meant for small and medium businesses to sell merchandise and promote themselves. Many women starting using it as a easy way to sell nude pictures of themselves. I heard they were going to crack down on this because it's not the intended use, but I'm guessing they may have come under fire after it was discovered some of this women are underage.


Anonymous 05/21/2020 (Thu) 03:26:39 Id: 79a297 [Preview] No.79980 del
>>79964
Well what are we supposed to do anyway? I can't control people

And yeah that's really fucked up to hear actually.


Anonymous 06/04/2020 (Thu) 21:13:31 [Preview] No.80566 del
>>78091
kys hedonistic retard


Anonymous 06/04/2020 (Thu) 21:42:22 Id: 9f2202 [Preview] No.80568 del
Stop Racism! Stop Fascism! Jab through the hymen of hate! Stop Racism! Stop Fascism!

Women hate racism. They love black men. My wife fellated a black man last night I was supporting the youth's rioting fighting with the patriata's and comprende's the real america. We had this one lady a big half hispanic half black woman. We called her poofie because she was thick. Not my cup of tea i have a wife. and she decided to fellate a black man in the stairwell of a parking garage. He was flipping me off as i ran into them. Its a very tense time for blacks right now. Cool it down with the hate. Women are for love. And white privelage makes it so i have to allow my wife to do whatever the hell she wants as she puts it. We haven't made love in years i cum everyday at the beauty and we may have a little poofie of our own. If the father decides to stay i will raise the child as if it was my own. TAKE THAT HATE NAZIS. My wife is right over my shoulder rubbing it i am going to ejaculate on the righteousness of anti-hate.


Anonymous 06/04/2020 (Thu) 22:33:43 Id: 293f48 [Preview] No.80570 del
>>80568
You were nearly banned until I read the whole thing.


Anonymous 06/07/2020 (Sun) 20:43:44 Id: b16318 [Preview] No.80599 del
Don't you guys think that having women as property is the best system?

Not like one owns a chair but like the ownership of puppies.


Anonymous 06/07/2020 (Sun) 20:50:55 Id: 293f48 [Preview] No.80600 del
>>80599
Haven't you shilled this talking point here before? I'd think you'd still be pretty upset about being banned, honestly.


sage sage 06/07/2020 (Sun) 22:49:43 Id: 79a297 [Preview] No.80609 del
>>80599
Didn't you already post this months ago?

>>80600
He's probably used to it. And probably enjoys it at this point


Anonymous 06/07/2020 (Sun) 23:39:10 Id: b16318 [Preview] No.80612 del


Anonymous 06/08/2020 (Mon) 11:16:31 Id: 0ad91d [Preview] No.80619 del
In the ethnostate, women will be assigned one of the following ranks, from lowest to highest:

hole - a hole is a woman with no rights. She is a dysgenic who has committed grave racial sins. She can be disposed of at any time and she exists only to pleasure men. A hole has been sterilized so that her genes to not propagate.

womb - a womb has no rights, but is retained for breeding purposes. She cannot be disposed of at will, but does not exist as a person in society. Like the hole, she has committed since against the race but because her genes have been determined to be acceptable for propagation, she is retained for breeding bastard race warriors.

wench - a woman who has rights and who has not committed grave sins, but is considered unfit for marriage as a result of dysgenics or poor personal decisions. If dysgenic, is sterlized so her genes are not propagated; if not, may be absolved and allowed to enter wife status.

wife - the standard to which all women aspire. A wife has rights and is married to a husband. Her genes have been determined acceptable for propagation and she is expected to bear children.

wife first class - A wife who has many bore children of exceptional quality.

greatwife - a extraordinary woman who has not only bore many heroic sons, but who has herself demonstrated manly heroism in the face of danger.


Anonymous 06/08/2020 (Mon) 16:58:30 Id: 5e5cea [Preview] No.80624 del
>>80619
No. Hitler's word is law in any future ethno-state. What you're proposing is the purpose of dividing all Aryan women away from the cause, and taking focus off of the jew. Now, women should not be raised above men against tradition and told such lies that they're stronger and men are weaker. That is the Hollywood jew propaganda right now. Women still deserve respect and they're needed, not at pornographic fuckholes. Your divisive shit however, we've seen many times before. You are actually promoting jewish degeneracy right now. Guess if that's allowed here. I'll wait.


Anonymous 06/09/2020 (Tue) 23:45:30 Id: 0ad91d [Preview] No.80640 del
>>80624
kek, you're such a fucking psycopath. yeah dude everyone is a jew except for you.

>durr hurr Hitler's word is law.
>uses the word "degeneracy" seriously
Okay dude, don't use your own brain, just do what Hitler said. This is your problem. You can't think for yourself, which is the same reason you can't come with an original username. You're no better than a christcuck who makes every little decision according to scripture or a jew who needs to consult the rabbi about which pair of socks he should wear. Plus you're a feminine control freak who can't handle the slightest disagreement. Literally everyone who posts here hates you. No idea why the BO gives you mod powers but I guess no one else wants to do it for free.


Anyway, the point is that you need to give a woman the freedom to fail otherwise there's no way to know if she is truly virtuous. If she isn't, she needs to have a status.
Anti Hitler and anti Christian. Typical jew. Goodbye to you.


sage sage 06/10/2020 (Wed) 03:26:20 Id: 79a297 [Preview] No.80645 del
>>80640
That's so cute unknown. You changed back to your old IP to shitpost here after getting exposed for being the TOR spammer earlier.

>you're such a fucking psycopath.
Did you even read what you posted AIDS for brains >>80619. And it's spelled p-s-y-c-h-o-p-a-t-h. Shills cant even spell right lol

>You can't think for yourself, which is the same reason you can't come with an original username.
look at the archives for an answer dumbass

>Plus you're a feminine control freak who can't handle the slightest disagreement.
Are you that projecting thing again? We already had this conversation with you little guy

>Literally everyone who posts here hates you
lol. Everyone or just you bro?

>christcuck
Yep it's unknown again.

>or a jew who needs to consult the rabbi about which pair of socks he should wear
That seems oddly specific. Almost like you know about this by firsthand experience

>No idea why the BO gives you mod powers but I guess no one else wants to do it for free.
You used to do it but you got the boot because you have AIDS. Is your syphilis stricken brain making you lose your memory little boy?

>Anyway, the point is that
you are a schizo faggot with aids who gets payed by glowniggers to spam this board for 3 years in a row. Yeah we know.


Anonymous Board owner 06/10/2020 (Wed) 05:36:22 Id: 5e5cea [Preview] No.80652 del
(184.92 KB 579x256 jews mocking.jpg)
(56.04 KB 501x263 helikesthekikes.jpg)
>>80640
I am the BO, son. That's me. The anon above me covered everything else. Pretty mad that I revere the words of Hitler, aren't you? Same old kike shilling points.


Anonymous 06/10/2020 (Wed) 18:56:55 [Preview] No.80656 del
(205.61 KB 902x909 SCHLOMO MCRUBENSTEN.jpg)
OY GUISE WAI DON U WONT 2 ENSLEEVE WAMONS? TEH WAMONS KNEED 2 B UR POOSIE WHOLES AMIRITE FOLLOW NASEAS? LEESEN 2 HEETLAR SAEM ES LEESEN 2 RAYBAI! DON LEESEN 2 HEETLAR. AN WAI DUN U BELEEF EEN HAULACOST WON 6 MEELYON JEWS NO 11 MEELYON JEWS WUZ SHOAHED AN NASEAS MORDOR DA EROPENIS NUT DA BALLSHEEVIKS. ROSHA JEWS ER EENOCENT NOVAR KEELED ENYBADY. OOYYYYYYYYYYY VEYYYYYYY


Anonymous 07/03/2020 (Fri) 10:26:09 Id: 665c9f [Preview] No.81023 del
>>80656
I'm rather certain many of these people are Muslims. You'd probably be surprised to know how many Muslims think they'd be in good company among XRWs despite having absolutely nothing in common with them.

The Communistic, anti-racist elements of Islamism need to be emphasised more. Islamists ARE Leftists.


sage sage 07/03/2020 (Fri) 20:44:26 Id: 79a297 [Preview] No.81034 del
>>81023
What are you even talking about? That's only one person showing up as an image


Anonymous 07/03/2020 (Fri) 20:51:51 Id: 21d426 [Preview] No.81035 del
>>80652
Hah, look how big your dick is!
Hah, look how long you've been banned!


Anonymous 07/03/2020 (Fri) 23:34:59 Id: 293f48 [Preview] No.81049 del
>>81023
>"It's not jews it's the Muslims"
You took a wrong turn.


Anonymous 07/04/2020 (Sat) 07:33:26 Id: 69b9af [Preview] No.81053 del
>>81049
What are you talking about?

The ones bitching about abusing/torturing/raping are almost always "western" Pakis, a testament to exactly how different even those raised here are.

Hitler was right, lying to women about the world is a bad thing, but it's important to be respectful of women in real life, while holding them to the standard of women.

If a woman tells me that she ran away from a man, I would judge her differently than if a man had done the same.


Anonymous 07/04/2020 (Sat) 14:37:11 Id: 293f48 [Preview] No.81059 del
>>81053
>The ones bitching about abusing/torturing/raping are almost always "western" Pakis
I'm going to have to return your "What are you talking about?" back around to you. Is English not your first language? Since when is it wrong to bitch about abuse, torture or rape?


Anonymous 07/05/2020 (Sun) 19:54:29 Id: 805cc3 [Preview] No.81081 del
>>81059
Bitching that we ought to. I should have been clearer. Pakis bitch that we ought to abuse women. Bitch as a proponent of the subject, not against it.


sage sage 07/06/2020 (Mon) 19:51:16 Id: 79a297 [Preview] No.81083 del
>>81081
Non english speaking shills like you 'really shouldn't be allowed on the internet.

But then again, you are on someone's payroll to make stupid posts like this


Anonymous Board owner 07/06/2020 (Mon) 21:15:20 Id: 293f48 [Preview] No.81097 del
(375.29 KB 1600x2812 4980.jpg)
In light of the recent "stop listening to Hitler" and "we live in a different time, guys" shill who went on a many messages tirade proposing to strip women of all rights and possess them as property (most laughable - "women don't need foreplay"), I'm going to post this video once again. Go Hitler or go home, shills. Know your efforts will always be futile here. We don't need a society of women as slaves, nor do we need a society of women in control. Respect as they transition back to traditional roles that do not deprive them of their nurturing and mothering natures is what's needed on the issue of women. Lessening their stress from this jewish feminist hellscape of insisting they're masters at everything. Period.
Edited last time by AdolfHitler on 07/06/2020 (Mon) 21:15:55.


Anonymous 07/07/2020 (Tue) 14:05:41 Id: 7c2225 [Preview] No.81107 del
>>81083
jesus fucking christ, you're a retard.

English is not only my native language, I speak one of the most English dialects of English. Do you know what "Spanwanned" means?

This is actually proper grammar and perfectly understandable for any English speaker. You're just some autistic retard who can't understand that "bitching about" doesn't imply a particular fucking opinion on the matter. Bitch is a verb, not an opinion, you fucking retard.


Anonymous 07/07/2020 (Tue) 19:10:24 Id: 79a297 [Preview] No.81111 del
(22.49 KB 340x243 pakhan.jpeg)
>>81107
Alright alright man. I heard you already. Maybe use a flag before posting

There's been like 4 different posters
here >>81053 >>81081 >>81107 >>81035
that resemble some retarded smelly pajeet repeated message spammer from years ago. That plus the board got hit hard by shills lately.

How am I supposed to know who's who? And why are there so many new IPs on the board anyway?

>you're a retard.
>you fucking retard.
>You're just some autistic retard
What's with all the insults?


Anonymous 07/07/2020 (Tue) 19:13:43 Id: 79a297 [Preview] No.81112 del
>>80624
There's a bbs board on Anglin's DS site that literally requires people to use TOR to access it. Does he even know that TOR is compromised? rhetorical question. He's controlled opposition He's endangering the lives of the people that browse there and they don't even know it.


Anonymous 07/07/2020 (Tue) 19:47:55 Id: 7c2225 [Preview] No.81115 del
>>81111
Because you're accusing me of being a Pajeet when in reality I'm the furthest possible fucking thing.

The arrogance of somebody to assume they know English better than an actual Englishman, when they, themselves, don't even know basic grammar, is nought bar obscenity. Obviously I'm going to take offense, you fucking clown.


Anonymous 07/07/2020 (Tue) 19:50:51 Id: 293f48 [Preview] No.81117 del
>>81115
Bloody hell, you sure say fucking a lot for an Englishman. Churchill was a piece of shit, by the way.


sage sage 07/08/2020 (Wed) 18:10:38 Id: 79a297 [Preview] No.81119 del
>>81115
>Because you're accusing me of being a Pajeet when in reality

I'm not really accusing anyone of anything. You're not really reading what I write down. Let me spell it out for you again

>>81111
>There's been like 4 different posters here that resemble each other
>How am I supposed to know who's who?
>why are there so many new IPs on the board anyway?


Anonymous 07/08/2020 (Wed) 18:18:34 Id: 7c2225 [Preview] No.81121 del
>>81117
Churchill was middle ground. Not the worst option, definitely not the best, his second term needs to be known more publicly. "Keep England White" for example. His successor, in spirit, was Powell and the Tory party purged any Churchill supporters after his death because of his anti-Communist, Imperial stances.


Anonymous 07/08/2020 (Wed) 18:26:03 Id: 79a297 [Preview] No.81123 del
(73.46 KB 587x800 mosley1.jpeg)
(238.86 KB 1200x1600 mosley2.jpeg)
>>81121
>Not the worst option, definitely not the best,

Let me help you find the best choice


Anonymous 07/08/2020 (Wed) 19:26:27 Id: 293f48 [Preview] No.81127 del
>>81121
No. He was the worst option. A drunk FOCUS ejected jewish leaders submissive bitch who pressured Edward VIII to reject the throne and bombed Germany frequently, first.
Edit: LoL at the kike I just banned who went on a 6 post tyrade about "there was no jewish conspiracy involving Churchill goys! I hate the BO sooo much wahhh" What did you think? That I would let you shill in defense of jews?
The FOCUS Group' definitely existed, and Churchill was indebted to them for supporting his lavish lifestyle. https://en.metapedia.org/wiki/The_Focus_Group
Edited last time by AdolfHitler on 07/10/2020 (Fri) 18:12:54.


Anonymous 07/18/2020 (Sat) 20:59:45 Id: 79a297 [Preview] No.81359 del
>>81127
>The war bankrupted Britain. Hitler kept asking Britain for peace

lol. Literally nobody won WWII. Everything got fucked thanks to it happening. What came after WWII was even worse, ironically. So much for "world peace"


Anonymous 05/15/2021 (Sat) 10:42:43 Id: 944786 [Preview] No.84676 del
>>78097
malcolm x used to hate white people when he was in nation of islam but he went on pilgrimage to mecca and then saw true sunni islam and disowned nation of islam and stopped hating white ppl and saw them as his brothers and thats why he was killed


Anonymous 05/18/2021 (Tue) 05:27:03 Id: b4a73d [Preview] No.84698 del
>>84676
Yeah, but this is still a year old thread you're bumping up

>>78086
OP isn't a genuine person. He's a datamniner. I know who it is already



Top | Return | Catalog | Post a reply