/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Political discussion of ideology, history, and [current] events.

Posting mode: Reply

Check to confirm you're not a robot
Drawing x size canvas

Remember to follow the rules

Max file size: 350.00 MB

Max files: 5

Max message length: 4096

Manage Board | Moderate Thread

Return | Magrathea | Catalog | Bottom

Please use the stickies + catalog
Logs can be found here: https://endchan.net/logs.js
Insulting National Socialism or Hitler or promoting jews will be banned immediately.

Expand All Images

Anarcho-Primitivism and National Socialism Anonymous 12/09/2020 (Wed) 10:12:10 Id: 07c963 [Preview] No. 83193
This thread is not to contrast with NatSoc ideology. A National Socialist society is the only one that an Anarcho-Primitivist lifestyle is compatible with, so obviously establishing that society would come first.

Are there any other AnPrims out there? If so to what degree do you support it and why? Do you think that National Socialism alone can combat technological overreach and oversocialization?

Personally, I believe that National Socialism and Anarcho Primitivism are ideologies that can coexist. For those of us that wish to live among nature, a National Socialist society is our best bet, seeing as NatSoc is the only ideology that does not call for endless expansionism and will therefore protect nature while providing a state and borders, which are needed to protect nature from predatory individuals(jews).

One living a good life away from technology will not pollute a NatSoc society, and would serve as a good example of what its volk are capable of when left to their own devices, so from the NatSoc perspective it's desirable to have us around as well.

AnPrim is a way of living rather than a way of governing, and people don't understand this largely because of the fact ISAIF poses as a manifesto when it is really more of a guide to rooting out the poison in an oversocialized mind.

Some men are meant to be wild, not within the confines of a socio-technological world, but the current system punishes them. I believe that NatSoc as a governing system is the only way that we will be able to truly live free of the poisons of post-industrial society without destroying our culture and history like some cucked "primitivists" would like.

Anonymous 12/09/2020 (Wed) 15:40:47 Id: 2efa30 [Preview] No.83202 del
Is that a thing? This is the first time I'm hearing about it

Drop Anarchy. Keep Primitivism. Anonymous 12/09/2020 (Wed) 22:08:53 Id: ae408c [Preview] No.83205 del
I'm certain I've discussed this topic before, and from that, I believe I may know who you are (to the degree of this board's history not personally). So again - I was an Anarcho-Primitivist in my teens and early 20s until I settled on National Socialism as a better result. Also when I followed the former ideology, I wasn't JQ aware. I dropped Anarchy long before I discovered it's jewish transformation from the intent of the original Greek Anarchos - meaning without a leader. The transformation was intented for the lure of the destruction of society, to rebuild from the ashes. The first (wave detached from the Greek) anarchist group was created by jews in Bialystok Poland in 1903 to "bring anarchism to Russia". It wasn't their real goal. Never is. The goal of jews is always to become the dominating race, as of course you know they believe they're "chosen". There were others such as Emma Goldman (anarcho feminist), Alexander Berkman, Martin Buber, Paul Goodman, Murray Bookchin (anarcho communist), David Graeber (Occupy protests), Noam Chomsky (anarcho syndicalist), Bernard Lazare, Isaac Steinberg (anarcho territorialist), Gershom Shcolem (anarcho zionist), Abba Gordin (anarcho universalist), Erich Fromm (anarcho kabbalist) and Rabbi Yehuda Ashlag (anarcho communist "based on Kabbalah principles"). Every one of them were jews. And Jacques Ellul the anarcho non-conformist's jewish wife was Yvette Lensvelt.

So no, anarchy is not compatible with National Socialism in any form. It's intentionally destructive and calls for the abolition of all authority which includes the state (some forms of Anarcho- are oxymoron combinations such as Anarcho-Capitalism or Anarcho-Bolshevism), while the National Socialist state is tasked with what does not happen with modern states. Serving the people while propping up the workers as the backbones of society. In an Anarchist society, there would be lawlessness, obviously unchecked murder, rapes, cannibalism, bestiality, pedophilia, mutilations etc. Every degenerate scenario not permitted in a lawful society. You're better off dropping the "anarcho-" precedent of that compound adjective.

As for Primitivism, which is fine to follow that ideal, it's also not entirely compatible.
The incompatibilities of Primitivism with National Socialism: The rejection of industrialization, technology, employment structures, scientific advancements (which NS Germany provided), the working class system, distribution of goods and services plus the state.
The compatibilities of Primitivism with National Socialism: Accepting of nature. Learning how to be a survivalist to fend for yourself and strengthen familial bonds.

A National Socialist society wouldn't restrict the ability of individuals or groups intent on returning to the primitive. The Völkisch movement was similar.

Anonymous 02/18/2021 (Thu) 10:35:35 Id: db67f7 [Preview] No.84000 del
>Are there any other AnPrims out there?

>If so to what degree do you support it and why?
I support it as an alternative to national socialism. With the obsolescence of the proletariat though automation and globalism the only options for most people are socialism or to reject modernity. If the socialism isn't looking out for the well being of whites it will probably force whites to become domesticated livestock for the jews. Sadly, fighting for white nationalism isn't a inevitably going to workout, at least not anytime soon. That's the great thing about AnPrim, if you can get by alone you don't need to worry about the culture or the government.

>Do you think that National Socialism alone can combat technological overreach and oversocialization?
In a perfect national socialist government the technology and culture wouldn't be designed to destroy us so this wouldn't be as much of a problem.

Anonymous 02/18/2021 (Thu) 18:32:56 Id: 220bce [Preview] No.84003 del
(94.39 KB 480x550 3323570.jpg)
(223.60 KB 960x628 2974571.jpg)
Anarchy is jewish. The post proving this is directly above yours. It's very odd that you didn't see it. Anarchy represents chaos plus the tearing down of states and nations. Self sustaining is not anarchist. There is nothing wrong with primitivism, as there were old culture following Volkische movements existing before and during the Third Reich who were all about ancient methods of survival. Don't go to kikepedia to find truth about them. That's impossible with Hasbarats crawling the site. You can sustain yourself without kike ideologies added in. Once again, drop Anarchy, keep Primitivism.

Anonymous 02/19/2021 (Fri) 18:29:11 Id: 7a2bd3 [Preview] No.84013 del
All (((enlightenment))) based egalitarian-liberal ideologies are judeo-masonic. Democratic capitalism, communism, anarchy, libertarianism. Kikes hate natural hierarchy and authority.

Anonymous 02/20/2021 (Sat) 15:04:19 Id: 6facf9 [Preview] No.84038 del
<kikes smirking as Socrates drinks hemlock

Anonymous 02/20/2021 (Sat) 20:13:22 Id: b513a2 [Preview] No.84054 del
(497.36 KB 2225x961 Bakunin on jews.jpg)
(315.00 KB 768x832 bakunin just knew.png)
Since this is a thread about Anarchy, I'll share some interesting things. Not all of the ideologues preaching it were necessarily kiked. One of the Anarchists in Russia, Bakunin, actually called out Marx and his jewery. He wrote an entire book analyzing his retardation. I suggest some people from Eastern Europe lurking here to check his work out. No English translation of the book though, unfortunately.


As for Anarchism in general, I think it'd work if the people were good-natured, traditional, racially homogenous and willing to help each other out. Some kind of a system Aryan tribes before had. But, a society like this, simply cannot emerge without an authoritarian shtick to it.

Anonymous 02/20/2021 (Sat) 22:34:13 Id: 220bce [Preview] No.84058 del
That was a brief period of time when Bakunin was furious with Karl Marx. Mikhail was a Communist before choosing Anarchy. Next in the 1900s when hatred of jews began rising, kikeroaches latched onto Anarchism as a desperate measure. It has been theirs since the French Revolution led by jewish influence with cries of anarchie gave birth to it with pro-jews like Adrien Jean Francois Duport, a freemason and member of the Jacobin Club. Kikes ran both. Other older societies with "anarchist thinkers" weren't specifically labeled Anarchy. Those were "Enlightenment thinkers", Stoics and Cynics of ancient Greece or when Athens had no leader in 404BC it was known as anarkhos - without a leader. Even Mazdak the Zoroastrian whom invented Socialism (which obviously was stolen and repurposed by Marx) is often labeled as an "Anarchist". None of those ancient men where about smashing the state, turning it to ash, rebuilding from the rubble and trusting society to run free of law. Anarchy has been hijacked for too long. It's modern interpretation having been corrupted since the early 1900s. That's why all that remains is colored spiked hair, "sex and violence, oi m8 take ya cheesy grin off ya gob or eyl sock ya one! anarchy in the UK, smash the state eat the rich" pure Communist shit.

Don't get me wrong. The ZOG state needs to be smashed, but another state must take it's place in order to guide the removal of jews from the infested nation. National Socialism is the only way forward.

Anonymous 03/09/2021 (Tue) 18:33:43 [Preview] No.84186 del
I personally do not share your view of AnPrim however I will agree with some points. I have read ISAIF several times so far and some problems that Kazynsky puts forth are indeed addressed by the AnPrim "ideology". What I think however is that recognising that such life style is needed, itself needs an industrial society, trough which you then conclude that living like a cockroach, feeding off antidepressants is no way for any man to live. I personally always defend a natural life style of a selfreliant farmer. I think that family life, away from the (((City))) is the actual solution to many of todays problems. If you can provide everything trough farming and hunting, you have no need for capitalism, at least not mass market one. You might need to exchange some chickens or potato seeds for a goat, but that is hardly comparable to the throwaway infested wormbrain that we suffer from today.

Anonymous 03/14/2021 (Sun) 06:59:59 Id: e1395e [Preview] No.84212 del
You make some good points anon. Give me some time to respond to them.

Anonymous 03/15/2021 (Mon) 11:42:32 Id: bfa778 [Preview] No.84229 del
fuck off kike

Anonymous 03/15/2021 (Mon) 12:45:49 Id: 220bce [Preview] No.84231 del
Many people said jews in this thread. Nobody has any idea who you're calling a kike but you. You need to learn how to respond to posts.

Anonymous 03/17/2021 (Wed) 05:19:54 Id: e1395e [Preview] No.84244 del
(124.97 KB 1000x761 C1_HIGrUAAAp8Ws.jpg)
To answer your question: You make some compelling points. Only problem is that most of society is already too used to the current way things are. You'll have a really hard time making people go back to a AnPrim esque lifestyle

>away from the (((City))) is the actual solution to many of todays problems.

Only problem is that most of the jobs, people and everything is located in the city landscapes. You will not find many things in, say, a rural environment. That's just my opinion based on a personal experience of mine.

Anonymous 03/17/2021 (Wed) 13:00:02 Id: b63ba2 [Preview] No.84249 del
go to an australian bush doof and you can experience anarcho-primitivism, as well as the types of people it attracts.

Anonymous 05/23/2022 (Mon) 01:47:09 Id: 7f608d [Preview] No.87539 del
Americans used to be moral.

Welfare then started.

Now robots exist.

Welfare and technology can give you an easy life, but you become dependent and lose your freedom.

sage sage 05/23/2022 (Mon) 13:18:06 Id: 3db9ff [Preview] No.87542 del
(547.37 KB 960x457 no.jpg)
>blaming welfare and robots for immorality
Typical of a kike with AIDS.

Anonymous 05/25/2022 (Wed) 08:59:33 Id: 2f25b6 [Preview] No.87553 del
One of the problems with tyranny is that it increases.

Americans born today think torture, kill lists, groping, and wiretapping are perfectly acceptable.

There was a time when you didn't need a driver license. Later driver licenses were required. Driver licenses then needed a photo. Later you needed a written exam. A driving test was then required. Later you needed a medical test. A car inspection was required. Later you needed liability insurance. Driver license fees increased and fingerprints were required. Soon DNA samples, microchip implants, and vaccines will be needed to get a license.

Anonymous 06/07/2022 (Tue) 08:37:07 Id: 33ea19 [Preview] No.87689 del
>Americans born today think torture, kill lists, groping, and wiretapping are perfectly acceptable.
An unresolved trauma victim of abuse will have trouble opening up and connecting; they will become negligent and, if they have a family, will neglect their children. A person suffering from neglect-trauma will become abusive, thinking they deserve/need more attention to compensate for the fact they lacked it as a child.

Abuse and neglect are in equilibrium, but it is incorrect to say that people will consistently find it acceptable to the point it will remain consistent.

You cannot take the nature of man, and however it transmutes will depend on nature.

Anonymous 06/07/2022 (Tue) 13:12:01 Id: 3db9ff [Preview] No.87693 del
I think I know which anon you are from that intelligent reply. Don't take AIDSkike seriously. He's always posting 'Americans scream', promoting the fraudulent gas chambers and his fear of the Gestapo coming back while promoting separating from the grid and avoiding society altogether. He knows nothing about living in the United States or how average Americans react.

Anonymous 06/07/2022 (Tue) 13:52:28 Id: 33ea19 [Preview] No.87694 del
AIDSkike sounds like a Mossad agent.

Anonymous 06/07/2022 (Tue) 16:32:44 Id: 3db9ff [Preview] No.87695 del
(541.38 KB 1124x3076 JIDF.jpg)
He's most likely a Hasbara fellowship unpaid intern shill or Israeli Defense Force. Could be a she for all I know, like this crazy bitch.

Anonymous 06/07/2022 (Tue) 16:50:00 Id: 33ea19 [Preview] No.87696 del
>demands reputable source
>references quora, the hill, and wikipedia

Anonymous 06/08/2022 (Wed) 10:07:54 Id: e95b6d [Preview] No.87699 del
Americans used to be moral.

Welfare then started.

Now robots exist.

Welfare and technology can give you an easy life, but you become dependent and lose your freedom.

Anonymous 06/12/2022 (Sun) 04:39:02 Id: e1395e [Preview] No.87737 del
Uhh yeah someone just posted that a little while back

But I think this is more likely that >>87695 has the right answer
Or just a bored nobody kike

Anonymous 06/13/2022 (Mon) 07:33:34 Id: 7f608d [Preview] No.87757 del
Libertarians must be obsessed about liberty now.

Talk to people everywhere. Pass out flyers. Print out business cards. Make a website. Start a newspaper. Rent a billboard. Make songs and movies about freedom.

You might be the last one defending freedom, but you must live with your conscience.

Top | Return | Magrathea | Catalog | Post a reply