Drop Anarchy. Keep Primitivism.
12/09/2020 (Wed) 22:08:53
I'm certain I've discussed this topic before, and from that, I believe I may know who you are (to the degree of this board's history not personally). So again - I was an Anarcho-Primitivist in my teens and early 20s until I settled on National Socialism as a better result. Also when I followed the former ideology, I wasn't JQ aware. I dropped Anarchy long before I discovered it's jewish transformation from the intent of the original Greek
Anarchos - meaning without a leader. The transformation was intented for the lure of the destruction of society, to rebuild from the ashes. The first (wave detached from the Greek) anarchist group was created by jews in Bialystok Poland in 1903 to "bring anarchism to Russia". It wasn't their real goal. Never is. The goal of jews is always to become the dominating race, as of course you know they believe they're "chosen". There were others such as Emma Goldman (anarcho feminist), Alexander Berkman, Martin Buber, Paul Goodman, Murray Bookchin (anarcho communist), David Graeber (Occupy protests), Noam Chomsky (anarcho syndicalist), Bernard Lazare, Isaac Steinberg (anarcho territorialist), Gershom Shcolem (anarcho zionist), Abba Gordin (anarcho universalist), Erich Fromm (anarcho kabbalist) and Rabbi Yehuda Ashlag (anarcho communist "based on Kabbalah principles"). Every one of them were jews. And Jacques Ellul the anarcho non-conformist's jewish wife was Yvette Lensvelt. So no, anarchy is not compatible with National Socialism in any form. It's intentionally destructive and calls for the abolition of all authority which includes the state (some forms of Anarcho- are oxymoron combinations such as Anarcho-Capitalism or Anarcho-Bolshevism), while the National Socialist state is tasked with what does not happen with modern states. Serving the people while propping up the workers as the backbones of society. In an Anarchist society, there would be lawlessness, obviously unchecked murder, rapes, cannibalism, bestiality, pedophilia, mutilations etc. Every degenerate scenario not permitted in a lawful society. You're better off dropping the "anarcho-" precedent of that compound adjective. As for Primitivism, which is fine to follow that ideal, it's also not entirely compatible. The incompatibilities of Primitivism with National Socialism: The rejection of industrialization, technology, employment structures, scientific advancements (which NS Germany provided), the working class system, distribution of goods and services plus the state. The compatibilities of Primitivism with National Socialism: Accepting of nature. Learning how to be a survivalist to fend for yourself and strengthen familial bonds. A National Socialist society wouldn't restrict the ability of individuals or groups intent on returning to the primitive. The Völkisch movement was similar.