/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Political discussion of ideology, history, and [current] events.

Posting mode: Reply

Check to confirm you're not a robot
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Password
Drawing x size canvas
File(s)

Remember to follow the rules

Max file size: 350.00 MB

Max files: 5

Max message length: 4096

Manage Board | Moderate Thread

Return | Catalog | Bottom


Please use the stickies + catalog
DO NOT CONTINUE UNTIL YOU HAVE READ META THREAD 6
Logs can be found here: https://endchan.net/logs.js
Insulting National Socialism or Hitler or promoting jews will be banned immediately.

Expand All Images


(86.51 KB 460x651 aWYnqL3_460s.jpg)
SADAM HUSSEIN Anonymous 04/01/2021 (Thu) 17:16:59 Id: e552b0 [Preview] No. 84353
Wanted to get to know more about Sadam Hussein but...
I have been hearing alot of bs in the medias , people , and other sources of information from both sides so i can't come with a final conlusion and form a proper opinion .
Both over-sensualize things and never come with real proofs .
Can you guys do a greater job and pill me on him ?


Anonymous 04/02/2021 (Fri) 00:13:29 Id: 43b32c [Preview] No.84356 del
>>84353
1)He worked for the U.S against Iran, then they backstabbed him and had him killed, which is what normally happens to anyone who allies with North America, even going back to the country's masonic inception

2) The incubators meme and "nerve gassings" were fake as ashit

3) Anime is bad


Anonymous 05/03/2021 (Mon) 04:03:12 Id: b67db9 [Preview] No.84576 del
The answer is always the same: read the primary sources.
Saddam spelled out his theories in the "little green book", which was written to be accessible to ordinary people.
Whether this reflects the reality of Saddam's views is far easier to judge in hindsight than when the book was published and you can judge for yourself.

Saddam is often considered to be an "Arab socialist" or a "third position" figure- but both exist in the context of the wave of Arab socialism that culminated in the US invasion of Afghanistan.
Saddam, Ghadaffi, Assad- all were arab socialists and all were independently invaded by foreign powers.

Saddam emphasized modernization, infrastructure, non-oil cooperation of gulf states, nationalization of primary resources and national banking.
He believed the oil resources of Iraq must be held by the state because they would give private entities undue domestic power, and must be protected from foreign powers.
He saw peace coming only when gulf states had enough to gain cooperating in the non-oil trade that they were no longer motivated to enter zero-sum conflicts over oil export, and to this ends started a massive infrastructure boom.

He was a brutal man, responsible for mass killings, assassinations and a range of atrocities- but saw this as a purge of imperialists.
In the context of rolling coups, foreign hegemony and general lawlessness he saw this as a necessary evil, development could not come without stability, stability could not come without violence.

Domestically he battled with the realpolitik of ethnic and religious divides in Iraq that blurred the lines of state control and national borders, sectarianism was a constant source of conflict between neighbor states.
Saddam was a Sunni, and his government was a fairly elitist group of Arabs who were a minority in Iraq- but his rule was secular; this was a considerable achievement by any standards and would have made attaturk proud.
Shi'ite radicalism was growing at this time, with non-state millitaries like the kurds openly attacking the state- the Kurds have long been used as a proxy for various foreign powers.
Eventually the radical shiites overthrew the Iranian government and this conflict quickly spread along sectarian lines to Iraq.
Saddam sought support from Arab states, but this only drew his government into deeper sectarian conflict and his campaign against Kurdish rebels led to an invasion by the new Iranian Shi'ite republic which triggered the Iran-Iraq war.
Much is contested about this period with ever side accusing the other of being in league with the CIA.

The Iran-Iraq war crippled both countries and left Iraq heavily endebted to Arab states who funded their war effort when Iran succeeded in destroying most of Iraq's oil infrastructure- Instead of unifying as Arabs, or as socialists there was disunity and anger, which opened the door for the same foreign imperialist interventions that the Shi'ites threw out the Shah in their revolution to stop, and that Saddam ultimately opposed.


Anonymous 05/03/2021 (Mon) 23:30:57 Id: 43b32c [Preview] No.84581 del
>>84576
More on your posts.

With the majority of Arab states stuck in civil war, major debt, or as failed states, a (((certain country))) can easily control them via proxy terrorists. They can also do more land annexations easier thanks to this (i.e the recent one in Golan Heights thanks to trumpie)


Anonymous 05/07/2021 (Fri) 16:51:11 Id: 89f033 [Preview] No.84614 del
>>84356
based


Anonymous 05/07/2021 (Fri) 16:53:09 Id: 89f033 [Preview] No.84615 del
>>84576
Good write up but I have to interject with
>this was a considerable achievement by any standards and would have made attaturk proud.
Attaturk was a degenerate freemasons and secular government is cancer.


Anonymous 05/08/2021 (Sat) 10:09:42 Id: 73221e [Preview] No.84620 del
If any anon can clear up I'll be greatly grateful, so Israel is the biggest terrorist pusher in the world, then we have the green book, written by Gaddafi not Saddam, and Gadaffi is known as the biggest terrorist player in the last century, but he's not an israely, so my question is what the fuck happened? Bo don't ban me I want to find the real answer, I don't believe in the Straserietes and their revoution, Goebels was right in his speech by saying the revolutionist was no different from the warmongers and they'll never reach peace with their con-nationalists if they keep calling for a revolution; My question is where does Gadaffi fits with all that terrorism, and also where does Sadam fits in this world (I can make a better man out of him just wanting a better world for his people)? I do not think the death of them was positive to their nations, for I am a nationalist and I think every nation should find his own way, but I do not condone the so called terrorism (for it has spray into my nation) I know the influence the jews had on my nation but to disregard the work of Adolf Hitler, for fuck sake I'm Stading On The Shoulders Of Giants, and I won't let judeo-terrorist claim my nation, so if any anon has a different opinion or knows something speak up, but I won't let the jews lie to my nation again. Was Gadaffi a puppet? Was Sadam a puppet?


Anonymous 05/08/2021 (Sat) 17:10:28 Id: 03c561 [Preview] No.84623 del
(168.75 KB 926x743 864894789.jpg)
(268.58 KB 2030x762 4566486.jpg)
(377.70 KB 2761x672 7984984.jpg)
Alright. I've avoided this thread long enough without saying anything. Remember the "babies in incubators"? Yeah, I'm not sure which of you were born before the 90s. The Nariyah testimony atrocity propaganda. https://youtube.com/watch?v=lzzAlpLpiVM [Embed]
Whenever I see anyone mention "atrocities" I'm immediately suspicious. The U.S. government's Psychological Operations grew in power after the division's pathetic lies at Buchenwald which was a team of typical lying kikes. What does that have to do with anything? Everything. Ask yourself if the claims came from the United States. If they did, they're absolute fucking bullshit because the U.S. government is compromised by wealthy Israeli lobbies.

Now. Here are the questions you need to be asking. Why have the past majority of U.S. wars been in the middle east? For which middle east nation-state is the United States doing this for? What purpose does it serve to make Muslim nations practically unlivable through invasion wars based on false pretenses which terrorist jews (Mossad, 9/11) are responsible for? Where do Muslim migrants escaping these nations usually go, and what people of which nations do they replace? Hmm, I wonder what tribe of hook-nosed bastards is responsible for all of this. No I don't.


Anonymous 05/18/2021 (Tue) 05:38:07 Id: 43b32c [Preview] No.84700 del
(291.88 KB 800x883 dany0.png)
(154.68 KB 776x997 dany001.jpeg)
(116.39 KB 800x952 dany1.jpeg)
(234.11 KB 800x689 dany2.png)
>>84623
>Remember the "babies in incubators"?
>Hmm, I wonder what tribe of hook-nosed bastards is responsible for all of this. No I don't.

Would that be mr (((Dany Shoham)))? The man responsible for not only accusing Iraq of having WMD, but also blaming Assad for "gassing people"?

And accusing China of spreading the coronavirus as well. He was actually the first person to spread the rumor when the pandemic started.


Anonymous 05/18/2021 (Tue) 05:42:28 Id: 43b32c [Preview] No.84701 del
(17.87 KB 400x400 shoham1.jpeg)
(85.33 KB 677x1115 shoh2.jpeg)
(167.09 KB 780x458 shoh3.png)
>>84700
To any Chinese lurkers around here if we have any


If you ever want to know why you're getting so much hate over the last year over the coronavirus, and who's responsible for all of it, well now you know.



Top | Return | Catalog | Post a reply