Anon 03/19/2018 (Mon) 23:17:40 No.1027 del
(2.74 MB 1700x2200 86059.png)
>>1023
>I know many Americans shrill blindly on anyone who is even slightly against guns, but trust me I am chill. I don't run around acting like different political opinion equals immoral, or even ignorance. So don't feel scared ta post anything in that regard because you feel like it's not our place to post on another countries policies, like we often shrill.
Well if you say so, there it goes.
If I had the control about guns and could have decision about them......I wouldn't know what to about them.
On one hand,it's an industry in which the US makes a shit ton of money and I would be killing one essential part of income. Also,Americans have to be prepared whenever a big operation comes. It's a top country for it and it cannot be defenseless whenever the big ones have a crazy episode(China, Russia and Middle East) and should bring the best technology for any war.

However as for the rest....what gives? I mean,I don't search for a peaceful hippie world where everybody is holding their hands happily,that will never happen and thinking about it would be absolute faggotry and deserves to be called a faggot with all letters.
Nonetheless,I see big problems especially on the children and schools. If a children were to be against the world and end so desperate that he wants everybody to pay for it,bam 4 kills or so overnight. Also,it would prevent someone from commiting suicide with a gun anyone who has depression or see things too over the edge(see /r9k/'s one with a KSG) and maybe,kills his family before the person itself. If everybody didn't have one,nobody(in theory) should have fear of no one else,you don't have a gun but the other one doesn't have the right to own one so it's illegal and should be reported inmediately unless that person has passed the tests.

So completely defenseless....however,I would increase a shit ton of money (and I mean a lot) on defense and civil corps. Without politics involved on those security forces,just obeying the law and looking just for protecting the citizens. And the money for tech and weaponry, would be spent on military and would encourage recruit campaigns or some excuse just to keep the rhythm in terms keep the numbers and soldiers.

Again,this is pretty much an European version. US does have too much trouble or context in it and dealing with it so carelessly is like walking on a rope between two high buildings.