Anon 03/21/2018 (Wed) 19:31:27 No.1043 del
(2.62 MB 1921x1080 1686414.png)
>>1037
>So basically another way to capitalize pornography and make it a source of income for those companies who force the bill. Genius. This reminds a lot of those intentions from Verizon,Comcast of making more money from the internet by putting the channels....I swear,that "adult content" looks like that but with a different cover or excuse from big companies.


That's what it will look like in practice anyway. Though unironic moralist on the left and right shouldn't be discounted as the ones who where the initial impetus for the thing.

>Trere have been a lot of shots to fire since the internet has been born. Those measurements are already stating what is currently illegal but with a bigger title of seemingly more effective when it's just another excuse to censor pages they do not want for free speech. Also,big companies support it because they know the bill would prevent others to grow.
>Basically,a trap to close webs and a red zone for any website when it comes to this topic. I mean it's good to pursue this but, I sense more evil and adding more salt to the problem than fixing anything. It puts a social problem into an economical one and I hardly see any effect on the root of the problem. For approving this bill(whose laws already state what is illegal)

Yep and yep. My personal outlook on at least the near-term is that it will not simply destroy the internet in one punch like its being shrilled but push a lot of stuff into a grayer area. There will be haphazard enforcement with a few random people getting clobbered over it. Just another that could trip you up badly. And it could make larger websites downright victorian in sexual attitudes. Depending on how many are made examples of or if even what is put on the books actually ends up getting enforced the way its written will ultimately determine how risky it is for smaller websites and internet communities.