>>1393
>It´s bringing the wrong values ofreality:indoctrination, blinding people into random hate, making bullshit with cheap propaganda. That´s what I meant. What´s wrong or right or the concept of ethics?

I understand, fear of bringing someone down. Leading them on the wrong path. An expression of loathing to the world may cause some else too. An expression of pain may make someones day worse, perhaps more then that. Writing about happily being a but of a recluse could even be taken too far by some.

>classic 70s prog albums, Yes Pink Floys, Genesis and King Crimson,etc. Nice.

Well, yes to an extent, but those aren't my main focus either. It's actually way wider then that or isolated to that era of prog. Everything from Rush, Kansas, Dream Theater and a bunch of other stuff that is either vaguely classified or related. Such as more classical music inspired stuff that evolved from it. Under the most pretentious definitions I've seen people argue not even all the core UK scene counted as true progressive rock. I'd suppose it would be better to just say prog/art/experimental rock family and leave it at that. Even then it's real nebulous. A lot of it too overlaps with powermetal but I've had metal heads tell me stuff such as with the blind gaurdians and spellblast linked below should be considered more prog.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=3aB6CPyO0Ww [Embed]
https://youtube.com/watch?v=LDN5qj4fuO8 [Embed]
https://youtube.com/watch?v=RtdKhwhAcd4 [Embed]
https://youtube.com/watch?v=eIHXhFJ4FoM [Embed]

Anyway I am far from an expert in any genre and there is a lot of random stuff mixed in. Also about to run on a errand so I'll finish these replies later. May the golden gate bridge be with ya!