Anon 05/24/2018 (Thu) 22:42:49 No.1427 del
>>1402
>I don't think your taste is edgy.. at least in a negative connotation of the word. For you the edgyness is not an aesthetic but an expression. You aren't wholly defined by it either.

for the most part, it´s the one that you would expect from a /mu/tant in its first phases of discovering music. It´s just that I don´t know where to clean the image of having this "not positive" nor comfy material about it. I can feel happy to an extent, hell some of the songs I listen to the most are really happy but the cutting edge material noteworthy to show up, is hardly that.

>it's also ant collectivist in meaning if you can't tell
I don´t get that part

>Most people consider there early stuff to be the best with it starting to go downhill somepoint in the mid 80's. Though there recent stuff is considered more true to form

it has a 3.53 rating in RYM, best one since 1981, so yeah, not all bands follow the trend of going downhill after the first successful albums despite its cliche and failing to prove it wrong.
>I actually listen to a fair bit beyond what is considered good albums by most and have a few songs I like from that era. it may not be the songs themselves.

One album can contain a few good songs that deserve some praise from a not so popular album from an artist. There are always hidden gems, even on the b-sides.

>There songs became more depressing and reflective rather then wrapped in a fantasy or sci-fi concept albums, philosophy and there rabid individualist themes >They also did a lot of experimentation in style as well, rather then in complexity. While I don't hate most of there work from that era i can understand why it is off putting to some.

Message too long. Click here to view full text.