>>2088 Yeah. Paul Singer is one of my least favorite of these types that I know of He is just below the surface of being spotlighted. He gets ranted about some in the left and some attention i the mainstream but he never has a laser focus on him yet his stuff is so much worse. He is someone I try to sight to people I get into political conversations with. Even if somebody is far left and takes it as only something ultra corrupt crony capitalist do, it still plants a seed. Anyone who does serious research into what he does will be able to at least partially see how all this speculators, dark money billionaires, and government action all influence each other.
>Challenging a country, not because there is the usual doubt one has to pay for the banks with interests (a small percentage added to the original value) but having to pay by force, to the will of one speculator who desires swimming in money in his home. I hope this doesn´t happen in my country, he is the creator of the vulture funds. Interesting question. Spain's debt was and still is healthier then the other crisis countries such as Greece and Italy, and I've heard that your economy is healthier then most of th other so called "sick" countries in Europe, but that it was mostly from exports and it hadn't translated well into wages and what not. I'm not sure that exports will be good foundation with the rise of protectionism not that I'm free trade maniac and the exposure to the downturns of other countries. But I have not studied your economic situation in detail and don't know who has set that narrative.
https://tradingeconomics.com/greece/government-debt-to-gdp https://tradingeconomics.com/italy/government-debt-to-gdp https://tradingeconomics.com/spain/government-debt-to-gdp
>like Soros as well. Those rich people don´t care about appearing in the press, they are at their best, low to mid tier speculators in comparison to the actual top of that party. You don´t know who they are but the strategies these visible speculators apply, they should give you an idea where they are leading us into. Exactly. There what "normies" are suppose to think is high level deep corruption.
>I mostly agree with the conservative points but not the laissez faire from their libertarian side. I would have mostly agreed and even support them a bit, but that libertarian aspect drives me back. Interesting. I've aways been split on both sides of th movement, the libertarian ones I agree a in principle, they have way less baggage then the libertarian party here and think that it is good they provide critical voice to the croniness of both sides when they are at there best, though I don't trust th blind free trade with everybody and would be concerned how they handled the military (I agree with cutting the military and being less of a world police, but I would have to explain a lot of stuff on the US military and policy to fully explain my position) along with a few smaller things, the conservatives side at it's best doesn't t the left control the terms of debate, and provides a much needed distrust to the banking system, debt, and blind adherence internationalism, but is sometimes so hard headed and so bad at PR that they ruin there progress. ( Let's shutdown the government over the debt! Democrats and Republicans proceed to pass a budget that is worse then the previous one do to no concessions they had to make to them), plus some of them at conservative for the sake of being conservative, even when it makes no sense.
