>>2600
>my thoughts, were a little bit lacking. As there was little assessment in technical qualities other than my vague observations, because I was the type of person who generally didn't let that bug me too much and I was sure how well I could brake it down.
we were all immature back then, I didn´t write that confidently and I almost wrote because of reactionary feelings. But at least, for what it´s worth, it helped to lead into other things while you tried to improve the analysis aspect. There were no schemes back then, just spontaneity....and that was alright.

>It was just what I felt/observed, which certainly isn't nothing but I wasn't sure if it was useful to someone who wanted to IMPROVE.
I wanted to improve but I know that the improvements don´t come because I always listen but because of how I feel it should go into the route whenever I think about the story. It has paid off don´t get me wrong but that puts me in a mindset that I have to surprise someone else. Let´s see if I can do that in the future.

>I have more recently been trying to fix this, but am not entirely sure where to go about it.
just keep doing but you have always done if you don´t feel that secure.

>Overall, your fics contained little that bugged me and I usually found stuff interesting in some of your longer ones. My most significant criticisms being narrative ones; most notably coming to mind how I thought you rushed the mid section of your last part of your Luna fic.
it was either that or I would have or recap to the episode. I have already explained it but that meta part criticism inspired me to go into the first person narration. So if you feel that bugged for it, it paid off with something else. A whole style based more about it instead.

>Do not worry about your side. Go about a work how you feel when feel and you can tell me how you thought it worked/failed. I dealt with harsher stuff IRL and wouldn't be bugged if ya thought something was trash.
the thing is....that any anon can call a shit thing trash. I prefer, while not a hugbox like others would say, asking you "why you don´t try this and see what happens" or "this part was interesting , you could focus more on that" kind of responses. I think setting the bar a bit further could help a bit more than stating the obvious.