>>3098 >alright, that message is cool and all but I am just saying, that´s formal as hell for a chan format. It feels like I am reading a message from the Mod team from their blog page Well it was full PR mode™, and seems like it did its job.
>archive You and me had the same thought. Arguably, it wouldn't be very hard to whip up some crude JSON-based archiver, just gotta have enough will to do it. Other than this you can always save the more important board moments on archive.is or web.archive.org. As far as disasters are concerned, I have contemplated keeping the previous board vols as-is, because in rare case of a raid and an even rarer case of any of them coming back here 4 men is way more than one to stop a flood from sliding content from the board although I set up 4 threads per hour creation limit too, although if moderation weren't active daily and the flood would be persistent enough this would't be effective. On the other hand board vols can easily wipe entire board clean, and those 4 men are 3 that aren't me so I may never know whether one of them one day decides to have mass deletion urges... Kind of weird and very edge-case scenario decision to make, although with each passing day the second option is growing on me, because out of two extremely unlikely scenarios, the former is at least order of magnitude less likely than the latter.
>it´s a kind of Pony Christmas..... Well if you ever decide on which version of the answer you want, you know who to call.
>let´s see how you can defend yourself Technically I don't have to, because board's approval is not a necessary condition to keeping the power[spoiler] keeping users on the board is another thing[/spoiler] Vote for democracy today.
