>>3100
>it was full PR mode™, and seems like it did its job.
don´t have doubts about it
>I have contemplated keeping the previous board vols as-is, because in rare case of a raid and an even rarer case of any of them coming back here 4 men is way more than one to stop a flood from sliding content from the board although I set up 4 threads per hour creation limit too, although if moderation weren't active daily and the flood would be persistent enough this would't be effective.
that could an alternative/seasonal adjustment for securing the board, even though there are not many threads to archive. 4 threads per hour would give use us enough time to save them, except the bumplocked ones.

>board vols can easily wipe entire board clean, and those 4 men are 3 that aren't me so I may never know whether one of them one day decides to have mass deletion urges...
it seems that you have in mind what happened recently in November on /mlp/. It´s the worst case scenario but I wonder what could drive them to do that to a board like this. However, this board has stayed in the top 10 constantly so I kind of suspect that /pone/ could fall as an easy target in comparison to last year.

>if you ever decide on which version of the answer you want, you know who to call.
archive and taking care of the 3rd global rule. I am not asking for anything else.
Memes and pony content will come by itself.

>keeping users on the board is another thing
not to mention that you encouraged to the one you replied back then. It would be basically shooting yourself at the feet.

>Isn't that judgement for the subordinates to make, actually?