Anon 01/04/2019 (Fri) 23:36:48 No.3121 del
>>3099
>was one of the "innocent" that was affected by the ban.
ouch, that´s unfortunate. No wonder you sound like you haven´t recovered from it because you still have the ban like the raider received. In which one of them did you receive the ban by the way?
>It happened after the recent raids on /mlp/, so I deduced some of them might have originated from the same /24 or /16 subnet.
just after the raids or days after the end of that period? It doesn´t make much sense to apply that whenever you get rid of the mess.
>you're a mod after all
in another place. Not just a mod but the owner of that board actually unless someone else has claimed it.
>they would rather prefer a diverse range of singular IPs spread wide across the address space, rather than continuous allocation.
that might explain why /16 or /24 bans didn´t work. I banned him for a week and the guy ban evaded it completely,celebrating it even.

>most of the addresses won't belong to the provider and that guy may get new IP on different subnet probably effortlessly.
Exactly, so I went for the easy route and
>But the wide range might actually hurt a lot of bystanders.
it worked in the end.
>Was that really ban worthy?
spamming pre fabricated /pol/ images that were completely unrelated on purpose to derail the thread to his propaganda. Not even discussing and typing like a normal person would do, but as a mindless user. See >>3107 as well.
I do have an sceencap of his intentions behind and quoted his post before rangebanning him. I had my suspections that he was a russian user. You can check it by going to the site itself with the last post in it.

Message too long. Click here to view full text.