>>3137
>If it's always consistently high You could plan that ahead.t. someone speaking always from the theory
theoretically speaking, yeah, it should work like that. However, that lag kind of varies and I would have to check the timing with that lag and synchronize it in practice. However, when you have to go for a GET, you are having in mind to reply instantly instead of replying with a prepared lag, because you depend on other users that have to reply in the meantime.

>"How can any proof be real, if our eyes aren't real: the post"
the eyes only detect half truths. The ear actually detects and tells the differences. You already have an example in this board that I used to trick Bridgefag. >>2481

>Is this even possible? No matter how hard I tried, the me just saw straight through my lies. It's like I lived in my head and knew I was going to lie to myself or something.
mostly because you are educated and have the values to tell them so you cannot apply that mindset to yourself even if you wanted to. I have known people (and pretty close to my family) that apply that mindset and lie beyond belief and lie to their own words by acting all the time. They could even trick psychologists at guessing if they are fine in their heads or not.

>faking a fingerprint of SSL certificate would probably require knowing the private key
as if I knew about that for tricking you.Basically I would have used

>Photoediting the fingerprint after the fact is another thing.
that...

>the one were you don't get to type anything nor check any boxes, but instead get judged entirely on whether your IP address is kosher or not, and only by that alone?