>>3140
>we could tripfag like Ponychan does (and they use secure tripfags by the way for each thread, the anti chan principle applied over there)
I'm not against namefaging or tripfaging in general, though even on chans that had it I usually refrained. It wouldn't bug me though as I could see the benefits. Though I wasn't their for those early chaotic threads on /b/. I always heard their was a chaotic group of tripfags and tripfags used to be more common on /mlp/ as well...

>well, it could a possible explanation about what happened over there as well. However, I think Hiro taking over the site makes you wonder if that´s the only reason for them to stay silent.
This right here.

>>3134
You too! Thanks for the zip!

Alright. I'm too tired to complete replies at th moment but I got Golden Oaks posted so I feel satisfied.
...
>>3131
and why are you here again?
and some anon mentioned us once.,,