>>4138
>I can see why you like this one.
I knew that before this post, you had used more than effect just to arrive at this picture. I had never seen a similar edit that you had show before.

>I'm not sure i remember everything I did it wasn't much but it seems there was a few steps I'll try to repeat it with something else.
if I had to explain everything I did in the edits, I would get crazy trying to figure it out. Normally, I would save a few copies of the process just to have a checkpoint/base material for the next step and apply the inductive method.

Judging it without knowing the Photoshop effects, it seems that you used a derivative negative effect.