Anon 05/25/2019 (Sat) 03:34:59 No.4157 del
>>4089
>Now, that cost me to try literally everything just to guess what I wanted to do. It´s like shooting blind at random targets. Maybe I wanted to go further because it would be too predictable to deliver the same all the time.
>You are onto something. While I am editing it especially when I do it aimlessly, sometimes I simply don´t focus so much on the meaning but on the visual aspects. In retrospective, after a certain undefined period, the user gets to see the meaning of it without being so biased.
I can understand that. Just trying to get your barings by feel and seeing where it goes. I still need to try to find some pics from the style I thought you were aiming for though.

>By the way, that´s quite possibly the best take I have seen with the emboss filter in which it doesn´t get too weird or collapses the picture with the effect in its entirety.
Its actually the fabric filter this time. I ought to try to do more like this where I select just parts of the image. The only part I do not like is the darkened wing, I should have made it a different color or the same color of the rest of the image.

>Also, I must say that Candy looks like she has come from an 80s (maybe early 90s graphics?) game in this case. The thumbnail at least makes her look like a sprite.
It's the cubism filter. She certainly looks pretty retro in the thumbnail that's for sure.