>>429
>Only thing I would say not too hold that truth as an absolute one. I often notice people, espicially nowadays, will hold simple explications to complex questions. It's certainly easy to do that when there is a lot of truth to it.
the posmodernism effect. Not that I am saying that movement or next step is the correct or wrong one to take. However, who can define the absloute truth?
The only sign of advance as a species is by not sticking to just one thing and learn as much as you can from any story,moral or experience that you can take.
I guess people are just too used to responding to existential questions, political stuff or quantum physics...
those have in common that they are too difficult to handle,but as we are used to seeing that everyday, many go the easy way because those topics become numb at some point and are hardly new to everyone,yet no one can give you the absolute X value that would solve all problems magically. A close response,yes. The absolute best? Definitely not.

>TLTR: basically it is mostly true, but don't be shocked to find violations to that rule sometimes.
"mostly true".Even science has violations to their own laws or principles because nature doesn't hold a 100% perfection or order,even in the most perfect of the possible conditions.

I can't be shocked (and I shouldn't) because exceptions to the rule...always exist.