>>4533
>The basic edit looks okay, not a fav not a dislike.
I was considering that basic edit to leave it at there and after watching for a short period, I noticed that it wasn´t enough.

>looks like one of those inverted creepy pasta images from the 2010 to 2012 (and maybe some would say 2014 era)
as long as the image induces to some kind of feeling or transmits something else beyond a SFM, I´d rather stick with anything. I have picked this image because it appeared in the artist needed tag but let me tell you, I didn´t have any sort of expectations save giving another attempt to SFM edits. I was pretty much indifferent for picking the base material when it comes to 3d stuff.

I might get an idea of the style from 2010-12 but I cannot picture how the trends of 2014 worked back then.

>Visually the Luna looks still to much like a 3d asset to call great
da*yay*it, I thought that the background and extreme editing could have prevented from noticing it and hide her ture nature (maybe I should have probably corrected/deleted the shadows so her model gets more plain for the viewer)

>I really like the ripple effect in the background. Almost looks like cubism in a few places.
the funny thing is that unlike your photoshop program, I haven´t used the cubist filter for the advanced edit.Most of the time, I have focused on using the spotty correction for creating some sort of cohesive layers that change the colours gradually, especially around the moon (dressed up as the sun because of the luminosity and its whiteness)

Now, about your three edits:the erase filter in the original pic doesn´t fit all that much for the pink colour.