>>5165
you know, considering in the format that one is in, one expects the negative/challenging things first unless there is something specific that makes you think otherwise.

Normally, when something is fresh, people actually take a hot opinion while the positive ones focus on the past material. That means that I still don´t have a clear idea where this edit or your opinion is aiming at. I only know that in relative terms, it looks better (from your words) but I have said several times that these are images that I edit so others feel encouraged to do the same or do it better than me, or at least, see what sticks out there.