Anon 03/08/2018 (Thu) 01:05:27 No.920 del
(1.46 MB 1765x1665 1673668.png)
>>914
>Yeah.Stalin's ideas were mostly just about keeping himself in power
>My thoughts of Dolores to Stalin was only based on the fact of a headcannon hardship early on in life, plus the fact I felt like she was using her Cutie Marxism was more about getting back at her things she personally hated and was more overtly to keep her in power without as strong ideological foundations, like Stalin or Hoxha. I do agree that Lenin in many ways would probably be a better fit, but that was my thought process when I first saw Dolores the Bridge Master.
Well,the leaders of communism basically just want to destroy and see things burn. The perfect opportunity to do anything you want in the name of good. It's quite possible that Dolores just accepted it easily because of her frustrations in her childhood.

Funnily enough,you are right about comparing her with Stalin and why she could become one despite of her architect job. Turns out,out of all the communist leaders that took the party and elite,only one of them worked at something before taking the political place:Stalin.....as a bank robber. That's certainly a way of ""contribution"". The rest did absolutely nothing.

And someday I have to compare the psychology and similarities Dolores and Ulianov have. I was amazed when I read that part but I have to read closely,checking and overanalysing in order to see that the character we blindly love.....was inspired and accidentally close as the new Pandora of 20th(and most likely) 21st century.