>>9262 >> >>9248 >> FYI >> Users can now request their data to be removed, preferably before the site goes down: https://www.ponychan.net/chat/res/123305.html >> Also said here: https://archive.org/details/vintage-80 > >>9254 > This sort of thing always has left me conflicted. I can totally understand not wanting something stupid you said up somewhere for all entirety but often in places that enforces these deletion policies context and culture can be lost from deleted posts and users. Everyone should realize that archive.org is certainly not a website where you can upload static content that will remain static "forever". Like if some idiot comments on an upload that will add a review file which will make the item desync with any hashtree anyone had of that archive.org item. Speaking of archive.org idiots, get a load of this guy: https://archive.ph/2024.01.23-121956/https://archive.org/details/@cinemainfotv - "Cinema info TV". He has only 5 "crappy" uploads of definitely non-rare media which is search engine-findable on other websites. I don't care about that as much as I find it stupid that he links to his donation page on his user account and also each upload page ( example: https://archive.ph/2024.01.23-121859/https://archive.org/details/ant-man-and-the-wasp-2018-trailer-a-4k-prores-5.1-watermarked ). And why is a 4K 1m42s video 7.47 damn gigabytes? Maybe that's the case with 4K (4096x1716). And he didn't state the source of the video at ant-man-and-the-wasp-2018-trailer-a-4k-prores-5.1-watermarked (I suspect it is from YouTube or Blu-ray then probably upscaled/other crap). I feel a bit dumb for caring or being annoyed at this, dumb users and other crap are on all websites.
