>>11189
>I believe Q is referencing three standard deviations worth, on a normal distribution.

thats right anon, standard deviation, {1,2,3}-sigma

>you've got to consider every post equally possible candidate,
>and no two candidates can be shown to contribute to the same end.
>It's just not valid.

spoopy posts but atm agree. not yet valid, just spoopy.

what would be really fantastic atm would be, for example, another
Tippy Top POTUS tweet, or something similarly unmistakable,
within say the next 30 minutes or so. anon would be sold then.