Moar Jim Stone
I was wrong about the reason why PG&E cut the power
Last year, California's lawmakers pushed through legislation that held utilities accountable for all fires "they" create. However, in July, governor Newsom created a $21 billion fund to cover for damages caused by power related fires. I did not know that, which subsequently means that PG&E cut the power for purely manipulative reasons, as many people suspected. This is a correction to yesterday's report, where I sided with PG&E, obviously I should not have.
Now the question goes back to who is in control of PG&E? I had suspected the fires were for social engineering at first, was then mistaken about liability, and am now right back to who is doing social engineering via power cuts?


A few quick headlines
Blackouts in California also hit those who had solar power
People who had solar power were expecting to be unaffected by the blackouts, and got a wake up call. As it turns out, all the state subsidized solar installations on homes are grid tie only, and don't work AT ALL unless there's power already available. With no grid to feed power to, rather than feed the homes, the solar power systems simply shut off.
GOOD ONE.