>>19609
RE how you know bakers are legit if no tripcodes.
Short answer:
You don't. You can't, you'll never know 100% beforehand. But you can watch them bake, see what they do. By their fruits, yes?

On a new board (and one where Q isn't posting), problems are not likely to be very dramatic anyways. So try not to worry too much. Focus on how you can support trust rather than rooting out evil operators. Works a lot better.

Want a functional board? Then create an environment of shared trust between all participants:
- value trust over certainly (you can't have certainly anyways)
- assume most people are trustworthy (coz it's mostly true)
- give people a chance to show you they can be trusted (small responsibilities moving to larger ones)
- if there's a question/problem, give patient feedback and see how it goes
- treat all anons with respect (anons are smart, motivated and self-activating--they don't take shit from bossy bakers or BOs)
- treat the board like it's for everyone, not just for the creator or current BO, especially applies to a Qresearch board (which can never really be a personal board like one on making kites or something)
- respect the traditions of the Q movement (the rules, how boards/notes are managed,etc). Assume that if people have been doing something a certain way for a long time--e.g., organizing the dough a certain way--there is probably a good reason it.
- Get oldfags to tell you shit (they know a lot!)
- Spend a lot of time looking at the bred (making sure things are ok, anons have what they need, there are no problems--and that there is a baker on duty, etc).