>>26295
>Everything is notable to anons that can’t be on the whole bread.
Strongly disagree
If that were true, they would want to read the whole bred--which they don't.

Cognitive psychology tells us that people can only hold so much info in their minds at one time. Put too much stuff--rather that REAL notables--and we cannot absorb it. Most well established fact in the whole field.
So a critical task of the baker is to separate the wheat from the chaff.

The wheat:
- breaking news
- ongoing developments in the news
- boat & planefag reports
- new and continued anon digs, espec on Q drops
- anon discussion of digs and other relevant items
- images that directly relevant to digs (ray chandler, epstein island, etc)
- for KEKS stuff (only if really funny, don't overdo it)