>>3651
It would seem so, although I have never investigated masonry sufficiently to make a commitment one way or the other. (Sorry, I'm a scientist--extremely skeptical unless I can have direct evidence. Most of what i know about modern masonry is based on claims--many of them from QR--not proofs.) My original comment was in response to someone trying to understand why masonry seemed to "go south" right after the American Revolution; I mentioned Illuminati founding in 1776, which i don't see as as coincidental. see >>3620 (But that is just a theory, not a proven fact.) I seldom discuss stuff like masons, symbols, or role of jews in cabal, because it's almost impossible to have an intelligent discussion. These topics trigger both anons and shills. The posts i got today are an example, sigh.
IMO the problem is that Q movement looks at stuff so far down the rabbit hole that it is hard for us (myself included) to approach some topics with real objectivity. Anyone with a heart gets triggered at times, including me. (Just ran off an article on one of the really "bad" topics, you don't want to know....so this is fresh in my mind.)

But ultimately, the moar facts and objectivity we can muster, the moar effective we are as advocates for reform.