'[Soft Push of New Narrative - Example]
https://twitter.com/KimStrassel/status/1098748506364203008📁
https://twitter.com/nytopinion/status/1098725171022700545📁
https://twitter.com/robreiner/status/1098395056052948992📁
What happened to the Mueller hype?
What happened to the Mueller will take down POTUS threats [@JohnBrennan]?
Was MUELLER the 'insurance' policy aka BLOCKADE designed to limit/restrict POTUS' ability to enforce the law?
[TRAITORS]
New talking points being pushed backing away from Mueller as the savior re: excuse A, excuse B, excuse C?
Why are *new* investigations by [AS] being started, if, as he's stated for almost (2) years, 'evidence' exists that ties POTUS to Russia?
If they had evidence, do you think it would have leaked?
If they had evidence, would they be backing away (playing down) the Mueller report about to be released?
First they pushed for a SC.
Now they claim the SC didn't look deep enough?
IF THE SC REPORT IS CLASSIFIED - HOW DO THEY KNOW WHERE, WHO, WHEN, WHY, AND HOW DEEP EACH CASE …………..?
IF THE SC REPORT IS CLASSIFIED - HOW DO THEY KNOW THE CONCLUSIONS OF THE REPORT?
Are *new* investigations designed to be an 'insurance' extension?