>>133368, >>133369, >>133370, >>133372

6 of 57
5. If this court finds doubt that the Florida 2020 and/or 2022 elections represented the will of the people due to widespread corruption, therefore necessitating that the election cycle(s) to be set aside and held anew, is it by default necessary for this court to set aside all 2020 elections, nationwide, that used the same compromised hardware and software, to also be set aside and held anew?

Court cannot sustain election, if there was substantial noncompliance by election officials caused by intentional wrongdoing, if results do not reflect voters’ will. See Beckstrom v. Volusia County Canvassing Board, 707 So. 2d 720 (Fla. 1998)

As long as the fraud, from whatever source, is such that the true result of the election cannot be ascertained with reasonable certainty, the ballots affected should be invalidated. Bolden v. Potter, 452 So. 2d 564 (Fla.1984)

An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.
Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 p. 442 (1866) The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985)

https://drive.proton.me/urls/JRPK7RPEGW#eIGr7e4a0JVk