dutchsinse
dutchsinse
2 days ago
Will someone please tell me what the big deal is about me reporting on earthquakes, and why people had such a problem with me doing seismic forecasting where I think the next location to watch is?

I published the method for anyone to repeat.
I've already put out the step by step method for anyone to test and do their own forecasting. Seen here if you want to understand how to do earthquake forecasting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTONW...
Previously, people had a problem with me over the "radio waves modifying the weather" issue I covered for years.
Everyone said it was "impossible" to modify the weather using radio waves, calling me a "conspiracy theorist".
Then I found the US Gov NOAA site which lists it as an option for weather modification (number 8 on the list at the bottom of the page- other forms of electromagnetic radiation) .. see here: https://libguides.library.noaa.gov/we...
__

So I put out the method for earthquake forecasting which anyone can test to repeat, and I found the proof that radio waves can be used to modify the weather (gov proof saying its possible I mean).
That being said... I don't see what the problem is.
I proved what I set out to prove, didn't make anything up, and ended up being proved correct on the most controversial points.
Why shut me down now?