>>147407
Elon Musk Subsidy Oversight
The federal government has established various regulatory bodies and programs to oversee the disbursement of subsidies to companies, including those owned by Elon Musk. For instance:
The Department of Energy (DOE) is responsible for administering the Loan Guarantee Program and the Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing (ATVM) Loan Program, which provide financial support for clean energy and automotive projects, including those involving Tesla.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) monitors and enforces tax credits, such as the 30% tax credit for solar installations, which has been utilized by Tesla and SpaceX.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulate and oversee corporate practices, including those related to government subsidies and contracts.

State Oversight Mechanisms
California, where Tesla is headquartered, has implemented specific regulations and oversight mechanisms:
The California Air Resources Board (CARB) regulates the state’s zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) mandate, which requires automakers to sell a certain percentage of electric vehicles. CARB also monitors and enforces the sale of ZEV credits, which Tesla generates and sells.
The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) oversees the state’s renewable energy and energy storage incentives, including those benefiting Tesla’s solar and energy storage businesses.
The California State Legislature has passed laws, such as SB 749, aiming to increase transparency and accountability in the state’s procurement and subsidy programs, including those involving electric vehicle manufacturers like Tesla.

Challenges and Concerns
While these regulatory bodies and programs exist, there have been controversies and concerns surrounding the fairness, transparency, and accountability of government support mechanisms for Elon Musk’s companies. For instance:
Allegations of preferential treatment in government procurement contracts and regulatory credits have been raised.
The dependence on government subsidies and contracts has led to concerns about vulnerability to changes in political priorities, budget constraints, or regulatory changes.