The Tyrannists’ Plan @ElTiranistas As an analyst, we had a general rule when we see something like a unified narrative change: 1. a false flag OR real attack is about to go down Often this signals that The Party was aware of an attack about to happen or they were going to do one themselves. MORE BELOW The approved narrative thus needs to be updated to match the event. This is often done when a new offensive would start to stop a particular faction in the USSR for example. 2. Some have already said ELECTION Yes, this also is a good reason for this sort of unified change in narrative. A good example of this is how Democrats are all "Christian" talking and even carry Bibles around election times but hate "Christians" almost all other times of year 3. A RARE reason can be the Party realizes that a major shift is coming in World policy. They then will "rewrite history" acting like they always have thought the "new" way and led the way in it even though they really were the opposite. Think like in "1984" when the guy was doing the big stadium rally. He switched from one enemy to another in a sentence and the crowd instantly switched to target the new enemy with him. He and the crowd then said they had ALWAYS been at war with Eastasia when they had just a minute previously been at war with Eurasia. This is a great example of what I am talking about. In this case it wasn't World policy like "climate change" is but World policy as regards the factional agreements in fighting to keep people under control. These are the three major reason a Party will suddently do a seismic shift in their approved narrative. There can be other reasons of course but these are the ones we immediately look for when this sort of thing is discovered. I did work against USSR, Cuba, and Cambodia. I also did a bit against CCP (China).
