>>174686, >>174687, >>174688, >>174689, >>174690, >>174691, >>174692, >>174693, >>174694, >>174695, >>174696, >>174697, >>174698, >>174699, >>174700, >>174701, >>174702, >>174703, >>174704, >>174705, >>174706, >>174707, >>174708, >>174709, >>174710, >>174711, >>174712, >>174713, >>174714, >>174715, >>174716, >>174717, >>174718, >>174719, >>174720, >>174721, >>174722, >>174723, >>174724, >>174725, >>174726, >>174727, >>174728, >>174729, >>174730, >>174731, >>174732, >>174733, >>174734, >>174735, >>174736, >>174737, >>174738, >>174739
But in this case, they wouldn't do it. They saw it. They read it. And they said, we don't believe it.
And it was only after substantially, like a month and a half after the election, that it got printed.
And it was a big whisp.
It was just like a bang of nothing because the election had ended.
If that report had gotten published, by the New York Times or somebody.
And I respect the Times for maybe only this, because they're crooked as you can be.
They're a terrible paper, a crooked, corrupt paper.
But for this one moment, they said, this is bullshit, we can't put this in.
And neither could any other paper.
Wall Street Journal's a lousy paper, very, very dishonest paper.
As you see, I'm suing them for a lot of money, because they do things very badly.
It's a really, it's got a nice name, but it's really, in my opinion, it's a terrible paper. And it can be corrupt.
But just so you know, they didn't take the Steele report.
It was the dossier.
Remember the famous dossier?
I called it the fake news dossier.