>>177338, >>177339, >>177340, >>177341, >>177342, >>177343, >>177344, >>177345, >>177346, >>177347, >>177348, >>177349, >>177350, >>177351, >>177352, >>177353, >>177354, >>177355, >>177356, >>177357, >>177358, >>177359, >>177360, >>177361, >>177362, >>177363, >>177364, >>177365, >>177366, >>177367, >>177368, >>177369, >>177370, >>177371, >>177372, >>177373, >>177374, >>177375, >>177376, >>177377, >>177378, >>177379, >>177380, >>177381
Let’s start with the fact that the Pentagon has named neither boat nor class
Los Angeles-class claims:
- Task & Purpose (Jeff Schogol) confirmation from US official
- Bloomberg (Tony Capaccio)
Virginia-class claims:
- Global Defense Corp: No author listed, no source cited
- The Guardian: No author listed, source is from Global Defense Corp listed above so this is a single source claim
Until more info comes out, or any credible sources state Virginia (who are willing to put their name on it); I am staying with Los Angeles-class on this one.
Quote
Old Submariner @USN_Submariner
Sounds like a 688i boat fired the torpedo. What a run for Los Angeles-class.
https://x.com/USN_Submariner/status/2029645019448283368

Oversight Committee @GOPoversight- Video: You can't make this up.
Democrat: "Mr. Chairman, it's outrageous that this is what we're choosing to spend our time on in the Oversight Committee."
@RepJamesComer: "Fraud?"