>>177889, >>177890, >>177891, >>177892, >>177893, >>177894, >>177895, >>177896, >>177897, >>177898, >>177899, >>177900, >>177901, >>177902, >>177903, >>177904, >>177905, >>177906, >>177907, >>177908, >>177909, >>177910, >>177911, >>177912, >>177913, >>177914, >>177915, >>177916, >>177917, >>177918, >>177919, >>177920, >>177921, >>177922, >>177923, >>177924, >>177925, >>177926, >>177927, >>177928, >>177929, >>177930, >>177931, >>177932, >>177933, >>177934, >>177935, >>177936, >>177937, >>177938, >>177939, >>177940, >>177941, >>177942, >>177943, >>177944, >>177945, >>177946, >>177947, >>177948, >>177949
Today In TV History @tvhistorytoday - March 12, 1974 - A "Wonder Woman" TV movie, starring Cathy Lee Crosby as the comic-book superheroine, aired on ABC-TV. #WonderWoman
https://x.com/tvhistorytoday/status/2032036552893743467

Today In TV History @tvhistorytoday - March 11, 1989 - The long-running reality series, “COPS,” made its debut on FOX-TV. . #COPS
https://x.com/tvhistorytoday/status/2031701334500487332

Todd Saunders @toddsaunders - We all knew this was coming… but today I heard about it actually happening.
A seed stage company backed by a well known VC openly admitted (in a board deck) that their strategy is to get access to a large incumbent’s software from a customer, clone the entire thing using Claude Code, and offer it at 90% less.
Not “build something better.” Just copy it and offer it for less.
The VC endorsed this as the GTM strategy. And even wrote back in writing that it was a good idea.
Using a customer’s licensed access to reverse engineer a product and clone it is ethically bankrupt. I don’t know how else to put it.
It likely violates terms of service. It may violate trade secret law as well (but I’m certainly not a lawyer).
And a reputable VC putting this in writing in a board deck is genuinely insane.
But it’s going to happen anyway.
Everywhere… all the time.
I don’t know where this ends, but we all knew this was coming and now it’s here.