Anonymous
03/20/2026 (Fri) 13:03
Id: e14872
No.178630
del
>>178624,
>>178625,
>>178626,
>>178627,
>>178628,
>>178629Brick Suit @Brick_Suit - Great to see this clown get served.
Hoping its a trend.
Quote
Project Constitution @ProjectConstitu
EXCLUSIVE: Why Is TPUSA Sending Me LEGAL "Cease and Desist" Letters— They Are Back To Trying To Threaten Lawfare To SILENCE Jounalist
They can’t answer the questions, so they’ve sent the lawyers. I just received a formal Cease and Desist from SouthBank Legal on behalf of Erika Kirk and TPUSA, demanding I delete my posts and apologize for "defamation."
My response is simple: I am not backing down.
The Facts:
The Retraction: Regarding the DOJ recording—I have already issued a public correction and apology. At the time of posting, I fully believed the information to be accurate. There was ZERO malice, and under the Actual Malice Standard (New York Times Co. v. Sullivan), a journalist is protected if they believe the info was true at the time and correct the record once the error is found.
Protected Opinion: Every other post they take issue with is my protected opinion and editorial theory. In America, you cannot sue someone for having an opinion you don't like.
The Preservation Trap: Their own letter demands I "preserve all evidence" to prevent the "spoliation of evidence." I CANNOT delete my posts even if I wanted to—they are now part of the official legal record.
The Gift of Discovery: If TPUSA wants to take me to court, bring it. I welcome the Discovery process. It will finally give me the legal power to subpoena the documents and answers Erika Kirk has been hiding from the public.
To Erika and TPUSA: Thank you for the direct line of communication. I will be using the contact info provided by your counsel to ask the "legitimate questions" you claim you want to answer.
The truth doesn't need a lawyer. Only lies do.
https://x.com/Brick_Suit/status/2034953874201874658
Message too long. Click here to view full text.