>>179564, >>179565, >>179566, >>179567, >>179568, >>179569, >>179570, >>179571, >>179572, >>179573
Curtis Houck @CurtisHouck - Video: DOOCY TIME: “And the Supreme Court tomorrow is going to hear arguments about your executive order trying to get rate of birthright citizenship.”
President Trump: “And I’m going.”
Fox’s @PDoocy: “You’re going to go to the Supreme Court tomorrow?”
Trump: “I think so.”
Doocy: “And just sit there and listen?”
Trump: “Because I have listened to this argument for so long and this is not about Chinese billionaires who are billionaires from other countries who, all of a sudden have 75 children or 59 children in one case or 10 children becoming American citizens. This was about slaves and if you take a look, slaves, we’re talking about slaves from the Civil War. And if you take a look at when it was filed, all of this legislation, all of this, everything having to do with birthright citizenship, it was at the end of the Civil War. The reason was it had to do with the babies of slaves and the protection of the babies of slaves. It didn’t have to do with the protection of multi-millionaires and billionaires wanting to have their children get an American citizenship. It is the craziest thing I’ve ever seen. It’s been so badly handled by legal people over the years. If you look at the original birthright citizenship papers — they all happened right after the Civil War — the reason was it had to do with the babies of slaves. And hopefully it’s going to say, because our country is being scammed. We’re getting all of these people — they’re selling the rights to them. People are making a living — a big living — getting hundreds of thousands and even millions of dollars from bringing people in and saying, ‘congratulations, your whole family is going to be a citizen of the United States of America.’ That’s not what it was for. It wasn’t for billionaires bringing people in their family and it was for the children of slaves. And what you really have to do, and I don’t think the lawyers talk about it as much, look at when the Civil War ended and look at the date of when this was enacted, okay?
Doocy: “Have you been to the Supreme Court before? Is this going to be your first time going to the Supreme Court?”
Trump: “No, I went once before, the opening of the Supreme Court and the last administration.
Doocy: “And which justices will you be listening for most closely?”
Trump: “I love a few of them. I don’t like some others. And you know, you say what you want, but you have the ones that were appointed by Barack Hussein Obama and Biden. I don’t care how good your cases — you could have the greatest case ever, they’re going to rule against you. They always do. And it’s not supposed to be that way. Now, the Republicans tend to be very different. They want to show how honorable they are, so a man can appoint them and they can rule against them. It’s so proud of him. We’re so proud we ruled against Trump. We’re so proud. We’re above it. There are those that say that’s wonderful. And there are those that say they’re so stupid. But the Democrats never fail at one thing. When Barack Hussein Obama or when Biden appoint somebody, they go along that line, you can have the greatest case in history. And almost, I guess I have to say almost, maybe I don’t have to say it, almost without fail, those people, four of them, sometimes five of them, but four of them will vote against you. You don’t have a chance. You don’t have a chance, and that’s not what the court system is. Now, the Republican appointees tend to go — and this has been long before me, this has been for many years. Some people would call it stupidity.
11