>>179773, >>179774, >>179775, >>179776, >>179777, >>179778, >>179779, >>179780, >>179781, >>179782, >>179783, >>179784, >>179785, >>179786, >>179787, >>179788
DataRepublcan (small r) @DataRepublican - In a just world, Georgetown would be dismantled.
It is the source of so many ills. Along with Columbia and George Washington.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2039322794123759821

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - Hint 3, just to tie it all together: Ghislaine Maxwell's sister is in the Epstein files for representing this investment firm.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2039321159624536459

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - Follow the money on NGP Van, which has a virtual monopoly on Democratic campaign + voter data.
Hint: it's the same investment firm that bought out Neville Singham's Thoughtworks which kickstarted his whole US infiltration.
Hint 2: Said investment firm was founded by Hillary Clinton's campaign finance guy, and China has a controlling stake in it.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2039320081813893399

David Clements @theprofsrecord - More thoughts on Trump's EO.
At first blush, I thought it was rather benign. That may be its greatest strength. The Youngstown Steel case, which is the definitive case on war powers, holds that the President's powers are at their "zenith" when he works in tandem with Congress. And that's what this EO does. It takes existing law, some of it 20 years old, and shoves it down the throats of all the democrat lawyers.
While Trump still has the "Trump card" through his plenary authority under Article II to do way more, the restraint of this EO is like pitching the Supreme Court a soft ball, where they affirm long held legal standards.
Much like the recent tariffs decision, where the Court struck down one provision, only to affirm several other routes for tariffs, with the President and Scott Bessent declaring victory by hiding their "real" power, I think a challenge to this EO may do the same.