>>179773, >>179774, >>179775, >>179776, >>179777, >>179778, >>179779, >>179780, >>179781, >>179782, >>179783, >>179784, >>179785, >>179786, >>179787, >>179788, >>179789, >>179790, >>179791, >>179792, >>179793, >>179794, >>179795, >>179796, >>179797, >>179798, >>179799, >>179800, >>179801, >>179802, >>179803, >>179804, >>179805, >>179806, >>179807, >>179808, >>179809, >>179810, >>179811, >>179812, >>179814, >>179815, >>179816, >>179817, >>179818, >>179819, >>179820, >>179821, >>179822, >>179823, >>179824, >>179825, >>179826, >>179827, >>179828, >>179829, >>179830, >>179831, >>179832, >>179833, >>179834, >>179835, >>179836, >>179837, >>179838, >>179839, >>179840, >>179841, >>179842, >>179843, >>179844, >>179845, >>179846, >>179847
The Democrats and open border advocates among the socialists and communists never imagined that the building of their constituencies would come under attack in this fashion.
But the debate has exposed that this is about so much more that migrant illegals coming to the US and starting families, with their children being citizens.
This is about a vulnerability to our country, our governance, and our culture to the deliberate and purposeful colonization via mass third-world migration with malicious political, cultural, and religious goals.
https://x.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/2039341331861094525

Shipwreckedcrew @shipwreckedcrew - And it sets the stage for the political battle that follows.
In the long-term, this is an existential fight for the culture of this country that has developed over 250 years.
To favor birthright citizenship is to endorse mass migration to the U.S. with malign motives.
That's the political debate. If necessary, the end of that debate should be a constitutional amendment.
The Constitution is not a suicide pact.
Quote:
Kurt Schlichter @KurtSchlichter
You guys understand we’re going to lose the birthright citizenship case, right?
Before you completely freak out, the traditional understanding of the 14th Amendment, which we are seeking to change, is not an insane reading of it. Nor are our arguments insane like the left has been same. That’s baloney to just shut us up. Neither side is frivolous.
It’s a tough call legally and objectively speaking. But when we lose it, and I think we will, don’t freak out that this is some sort of conspiracy. It’s a hard legal decision. Sadly, we have three judges who aren’t even going to try to examine the question and will always vote for what leftists want. But the rest of the court has to make a tough legal call.
I think our reading is the correct one. For various reasons, I think they’re going to rule against us. Don’t freak out when they do. It’s not an utterly irrational ruling like so many of the district court opinions we’ve seen.