Anonymous
04/08/2026 (Wed) 13:27
Id: 87a524
No.180256
del
>>180238,
>>180239,
>>180240,
>>180241,
>>180242,
>>180243,
>>180244,
>>180245,
>>180246,
>>180247,
>>180248,
>>180249,
>>180250,
>>180251,
>>180252,
>>180253,
>>180254,
>>180255DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - I'm sure if you counter-signal open borders hard enough, you'll actually graduate from having to file a 990-N to being a Open Society Foundations "libertarian" grantee like R Street Institute.
I see your president is making good use of his public policy masters degree - a true commitment to a libertarian lifestyle right there. Good luck in your quest to get admitted to the fractal ecosystem of NGOs saturating our society and choking off all our freedoms.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2041546321945821575DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - The tyranny of 2020 wasn't even that long ago, lol.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2041538538391437568DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - Yes! Well put!
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2041536634403876948DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - This political compass map may look nonsensical at first, but it follows a consistent internal logic.
Within the rules-based international order, freedom is not understood as a set of inherent natural rights that must be protected. Instead, it is framed as a continuous process of negotiation, where individuals and groups form voluntary associations through multilateral institutions.
From that perspective, being born into a particular nation or culture is seen more as bondage. Look at the map again with that definition of "freedom" in your head. It'll snap into place.
American political traditions and the globalist framework rest on fundamentally different epistemological foundations. The American model is grounded in the idea of natural rights; the globalist model prioritizes institutionalized pluralism and negotiated order.
You can see this distinction in Soros’s own words:
Quote:
Message too long. Click here to view full text.