Anonymous
04/15/2026 (Wed) 13:40
Id: 86efbf
No.180891
del
>>180879,
>>180880,
>>180881,
>>180882,
>>180883,
>>180884,
>>180885,
>>180886,
>>180887,
>>180888,
>>180889,
>>180890DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - So let me lay this out.
UVU was the institutional home of this network. MWEG held conferences there for 3+ years.... sponsored by the university. Braver Angels personnel were embedded in faculty. UVU professors were building the Dignity Index's empirical base. Color revolution methodology was being taught on campus.
And then Charlie Kirk, the man whose speech the Dignity Index would score as maximum contempt, was shot dead. At UVU. On their campus.
The worst "bridge-building" failure in modern American history happened at ground zero for replicating color revolution methodology in the United States.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2044121204253175810DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - This should reframe how you think about the "Dignity Index."
And why they hired a literal Cuban-trained Communist revolutionary to develop the Dignity Index.
It's increasingly looking less like a mistake and more like a feature.
Quote:
DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican
Fanaeian is a longtime Marxist activist who trained in Cuba and came under scrutiny for possible foreknowledge of Kirk's assassination.
If that's who they vetted and hired to help build the Dignity Index, what does it say about the Dignity Index's neutrality?
https://t.co/LB6Wqa0ikshttps://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2044121041518366773
Message too long. Click here to view full text.