>>183348, >>183349, >>183350, >>183351, >>183352, >>183353, >>183354, >>183355, >>183356, >>183357, >>183358, >>183359, >>183360, >>183361, >>183362, >>183363, >>183364, >>183365, >>183366, >>183367, >>183368, >>183369, >>183370, >>183371, >>183372, >>183373, >>183374, >>183375, >>183376, >>183377, >>183378, >>183379, >>183380, >>183381, >>183382, >>183383, >>183384, >>183385, >>183386, >>183387, >>183388
Mollie @MZHemingway - What you and your cohorts did with your Russia collusion lies was so horrific and so evil, and I think deep down you know it.
Quote:
Barb McQuade @BarbMcQuade
17 US intelligence agencies found that Russia interfered with the 2016 presidential election. The US government had a duty to investigate it. Trying to spin the probe as a grand conspiracy is itself the grand conspiracy.
Quote
Ryan J. Reilly @ryanjreilly
FBI interviewing CIA officers in Brennan investigation
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/fbi-interviewing-cia-officers-brennan-investigation-rcna344817
https://x.com/MZHemingway/status/2054421412052373870

NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman @NASAAdmin - I actually did post on X regarding the report a month or so ago. I really value the IG work at NASA. It is a sobering story, and as I wrote previously, it should serve as a cautionary tale about contracting methods, especially leaning into an 'as-a-service' model when NASA is the only customer and before a market has matured. The report was also largely written before the changes we implemented a few months ago, when I posted publicly about the NASA resources we are embedding across the supply chain to take an active role, clear blockers and drive outcomes. That statement applies to the entirety of Artemis acceleration initiative, the Moon Base buildout, and other key programs... We won't sit on our hands...and the suits will be tested in LEO in 2027.
https://x.com/NASAAdmin/status/2054747676919415253

NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman @NASAAdmin - Lori - always appreciate the interest and commentary!
We never officially moved the timing of Artemis III to 'late' 2027. A reporter wrote that after misinterpreting my quick response to a question during a budget hearing. In the same hearing, I also said we were gaining increased confidence in interoperability tests with both landers in 2027. I am quite sure at least one will incorporate an ECLSS demonstration.
As for 2028, we have always said we would protect for up to two landing attempts, if required. That story has not changed, and the South Pole was always the landing target.