>>185029, >>185030, >>185031, >>185032
Craig Caplan @CraigCaplan - Justice Department "disagrees strongly with the (Court) decision on the Anti-Weaponization Fund...that, under no circumstances, may the Department of Justice proceed with the Anti-Weaponization Fund" and "will abide by the Court’s ruling."
Quote:
U.S. Department of Justice @TheJusticeDept
The Department of Justice disagrees strongly with the decision on the Anti-Weaponization Fund put forth by the United States District Court Judge in the Eastern District of Virginia, wherein the Court stated that, under no circumstances, may the Department of Justice proceed with the Anti-Weaponization Fund recently established in order to make up for the tremendous abuse, harm, and hate unfairly shown to so many people. This Fund was open to anybody who was so weaponized, targeted, or persecuted, whether they were Democrat, Republican, Conservative, Independent, or otherwise. The Department will abide by the Court’s ruling.
https://x.com/CraigCaplan/status/2061538242155946399

Craig Caplan @CraigCaplan - Schumer on Trump's plans to drop the $1.8B anti-weaponization fund: "This week, Senate Democrats will push legislation to ban this slush fund and ensure no president can ever do this again."
Quote:
Chuck Schumer @SenSchumer
If Trump and Republicans are truly abandoning this corrupt scheme, they should have zero problem banning it in law.
This week, Senate Democrats will push legislation to ban this slush fund and ensure no president can ever do this again. Trump’s word is nowhere near enough.
Quote
Axios @axios
Scoop: Trump plans to drop "weaponization" fund https://www.axios.com/2026/06/01/trump-weaponization-fund-drop
https://x.com/CraigCaplan/status/2061535415601893418