>>185029, >>185030, >>185031, >>185032, >>185033, >>185034, >>185035, >>185036, >>185037, >>185038, >>185039, >>185040
Judicial Watch @JudicialWatch - Video: Dirty voting rolls can mean dirty elections. Judicial Watch’s new federal lawsuit in California alleges 873,092 voter registrations have remained inactive for at least THREE federal elections, and some for much longer, including 10 years. @TomFitton
https://x.com/JudicialWatch/status/2061539530616844480

Judicial Watch @JudicialWatch - “Trump did something rare in Washington: He walked away from potentially billions in direct damages for himself and his company, so that the federal government would instead set up a process to compensate Americans abused by that same govt,” @TomFitton.
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/5897578-trump-anti-weaponization-fund-criticism/
https://x.com/JudicialWatch/status/2061529016037757333

Judicial Watch @JudicialWatch - Video: If Judicial Watch’s lawsuit succeeds in California, it could bring the total number of names cleaned from the voter rolls nationwide to over 7 MILLION! @TomFitton
https://x.com/JudicialWatch/status/2061508324731056252

Judicial Watch @JudicialWatch - “Judicial Watch’s federal lawsuit confirms California has a dirty voting rolls crisis – with thousands of old names on the rolls going back at least 10 years," @TomFitton.
https://www.judicialwatch.org/california-clean-up-inactive-voter-registrations/
https://x.com/JudicialWatch/status/2061478629972881882

Judicial Watch @JudicialWatch - Judicial Watch is not going to stop asking questions! Judicial Watch uses the open records or freedom of information laws and other tools to investigate and uncover misconduct by government officials and litigation to hold to account politicians and public officials who engage in corrupt activities. @TomFitton
https://x.com/JudicialWatch/status/2061456277847298462