>>187802, >>187803, >>187804, >>187805, >>187806, >>187807, >>187808, >>187809, >>187810, >>187811, >>187812, >>187813, >>187814, >>187815, >>187816, >>187817, >>187818, >>187819, >>187820, >>187821, >>187822, >>187823, >>187824, >>187825, >>187826, >>187827, >>187828, >>187829, >>187830, >>187831, >>187832, >>187833
DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - . @grok look up the Dignity Index scoring. Then look up some of Jesus' more fiery speeches. Where does Jesus score on the Dignity Index?
Parent Post:
Cynical Publius @CynicalPublius - Also, this is critical theory in action.
This index is inherently based on the idea that morality is subjective, that there is no objective truth, and that all ideas and belief systems are worthy of equal consideration.
That is the essence of critical theory: the absence of objective truth.
Under the "dignity index" Nazis and jihadists are worthy of respect.
THAT is "dignifying" abject evil, and nothing more.
Quote
DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican
The Dignity Index scores speech on a 1-8 scale. Kirk's style, passionate, unapologetic populism, would score a 2-3: "contempt."
The tool was designed to make the way conservatives communicate look pathological. It doesn't ban your speech. It SCORES it... CCP-style social credit.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2076414911656120601

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - 😈
Parent Post:
LHGrey @Grey_0G - You have no idea who you crossed when you crossed me honey. I will defend Erika relentlessly. You don't know a fucking thing about psychology. Also I'm an Atheist. I don't believe in your sadistic sky daddy.