>>190253,
>>190254,
>>190255,
>>190256,
>>190257,
>>190258,
>>190259,
>>190260,
>>190261,
>>190262,
>>190263,
>>190264,
>>190265,
>>190266,
>>190267,
>>190268,
>>190269,
>>190270,
>>190271,
>>190272,
>>190273,
>>190274,
>>190275,
>>190276,
>>190277,
>>190278,
>>190279James O'Keefe @JamesOKeefeIII - Video: O’KEEFE INVESTIGATES DUPLICATE ABSENTEE BALLOT RETURN ENVELOPES IN DETROIT, MICHIGAN
GOES DOOR TO DOOR INTERVIEWING AFFECTED VOTERS
"That's illegal right? you couldn't... scrape one of them off?"
“They probably sent her two ballots, and she just signed them, I guess.”
"Keep them [cameras] pointed from my house... Do you want me to get the dog?"
Parent Post:
James O'Keefe @JamesOKeefeIII
OMG obtained voter records showing multiple absentee-ballot return envelopes with individual Detroit voters. These records revealed discrepancies including different ballot numbers, different election-official initials, strikingly different signatures, and, in one case, separate voter identification numbers associated with the same name, birthdate, and address.
O’Keefe and OMG undercover journalists went door-to-door to locate the voters named on the envelopes and ask them directly about what the records showed. Michael Lynn Barnett was confronted with two return envelopes carrying different ballot numbers and different election-official initials. When O’Keefe asked about the records, Barnett responded, “What about it?” and later ordered him off the property. At another stop, Myrtle Harvey appeared to acknowledge the two absentee-ballot return envelopes, telling O’Keefe, “They must have sent me two,” and suggesting the city of Detroit had made a mistake.
The registered address associated with Margarett Alma Bass led OMG to an abandoned building. At Naomi Price’s home, O’Keefe attempted to ask why her name appeared on two return envelopes bearing different ballot numbers (4831 and 5490), but a family member refused to let the team speak with her. And at the final stop, Myranda Morrow did not recognize the second signature appearing on an absentee-ballot return envelope associated with her, raising the question of who signed it and why.
In the Myrtle Harvey case, OMG says its barcode scans produced two separate voter identification numbers despite the records carrying the same name, birthdate, and address. Her signatures on the two envelopes also appeared nearly identical. Being registered twice is not itself evidence that someone voted twice, and the existence of two return envelopes does not establish that two ballots were accepted. The records show discrepancies, but they do not tell us what ultimately happened to each ballot. To determine whether both ballots were counted or whether one was canceled, replaced, rejected, spoiled, or otherwise removed from the process, OMG is seeking the complete election records for each case.
To determine what actually happened with each ballot, OMG submitted written requests to the Detroit Department of Elections and the City of Detroit’s FOIA office for the complete voting and absentee ballot histories of the voters identified in the investigation.
OMG is also seeking ballot applications, replacement ballot requests, return envelopes, poll book records, counting board totals, ballot numbers, mailing and return dates, and records showing the final status of each ballot. These records should help determine whether each ballot was accepted, rejected, replaced, canceled, spoiled, or ultimately counted.
https://x.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/2086941847780249923James O'Keefe @JamesOKeefeIII - Video: O’KEEFE INVESTIGATES DUPLICATE ABSENTEE BALLOT RETURN ENVELOPES IN DETROIT, MICHIGAN
Message too long. Click here to view full text.