>>191174, >>191175, >>191176, >>191177, >>191178, >>191179, >>191180, >>191181, >>191182, >>191183, >>191184, >>191185, >>191186, >>191187, >>191188, >>191189, >>191190, >>191191, >>191192, >>191193, >>191194, >>191195, >>191196, >>191197, >>191198
DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - To those all who are convincing me that I’m acting on a misunderstanding -
She knew my background.
She knew the markings that would get me in trouble.
She confirmed she’d made all the “redactions” necessary.
The leaks given to me were of zero operational value to any effort.
It’s one thing to try and get me fired. It’s another to try and get me to commit a crime.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2090972067332042852

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - This is an invariant: if I had done as you requested, I would be a criminal right now.
It’s one thing to try and fire me. It’s another to rob my children of their mother.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2090926613072351725

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - Let the record be known that I did not name you. You named yourself.
Quoted Post:
Under Secretary of State Sarah B. Rogers @UnderSecPD - lol, these are my text messages and documents. The "markings" are FOIA reded required even for voluntary disclosure. To prove this isn't a "trap," I will happily disclose the documents myself. Here they are (1/x):
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2090926032136057116